| === fisted_ is now known as fisted | ||
| === Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| persia | So, I'm out of practice. Is there a convenient way to discover all my workitems now that UDS is complete? | 04:37 |
|---|---|---|
| MestreLion | I'm creating very simple, "hello world" style project, for learning purposes. I'd like to use git, git-buildpackage, pristine-tar, etc. All packaging tutorials assume I will have a tarball to start, so what is the best way, using those tools, to create my 1.0 tarball? | 05:54 |
| MestreLion | should my Makefile do that in a "dist" target, or it is better to use some git-related tools for that? | 05:56 |
| MestreLion | I'm creating very simple, "hello world" style project, for learning purposes. I'd like to use git, git-buildpackage, pristine-tar, etc. All packaging tutorials assume I will have a tarball to start, so what is the best way, using those tools, to create my 1.0 tarball? should my Makefile do that in a "dist" target, or it is better to use some git-related tools for that? | 05:58 |
| MestreLion | oops, sorry for repost | 05:59 |
| persia | MestreLion: I don't know that workflow particularly well, but I'd suggest tagging your release in git, and then using git-archive to generate the tarball. Someone with more experience doing this may have better suggestions. You may find it convenient to put some of the commands to make this happen in your dist target, to ensure the solution you have selected is well documented and repeatable. | 06:00 |
| MestreLion | persia: is it ok to use git-archive in a Makefile? | 06:01 |
| persia | If you're willing to assert that it is required to build the source artefact, which means that anyone generating the artifact must have it installed. | 06:03 |
| persia | I wouldn't recommend having it required for the default target, or any build targets, because some folk (including Ubuntu) prefer to build with no network access. | 06:04 |
| persia | You might also want to try asking in different fora: lots of folks usually here are recovering from UDS last week, and many typically consume tarballs, rather than generating them. | 06:05 |
| MestreLion | ok persia, thanks :) | 06:09 |
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio__ | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest38655 | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest61656 | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest78089 | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest88149 | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === morphis|away is now known as morphis | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === cpg is now known as cpg|away | ||
| === mcclurmc_away is now known as mcclurmc | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === morphis is now known as morphis|away | ||
| === morphis|away is now known as morphis | ||
| === notgary_ is now known as notgary | ||
| cariveri | Hi there. How would I start to develope on ubuntu, say the unity bar/interface ? | 14:57 |
| === mcclurmc is now known as mcclurmc_away | ||
| === mcclurmc_away is now known as mcclurmc | ||
| cariveri | Alright. found it myself. thanks any way. keep it up! | 15:05 |
| === mcclurmc is now known as mcclurmc_away | ||
| === mcclurmc_away is now known as mcclurmc | ||
| === morphis is now known as morphis|away | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === morphis|away is now known as morphis | ||
| === morphis is now known as morphis|away | ||
| lfaraone | /msg laney I didn't get an invoice for an amohnt this month, did you? | 18:31 |
| * Laney giggles | 18:32 | |
| Laney | lfaraone: no, seems not | 18:32 |
| ajmitch | heh | 18:33 |
| lfaraone | Oops. | 18:35 |
| lfaraone | Welllllll nothing private, that's what I sent you in the channel earlier :P | 18:35 |
| lfaraone | Should we assume they just are doing this until they tell us otherwise? | 18:35 |
| Laney | you'll run the risk of being surprised with a bill | 18:37 |
| * ajmitch never likes to be surprised with those | 18:38 | |
| === cpg|away is now known as cpg | ||
| === thegodfather is now known as fabbione | ||
| === cpg is now known as cpg|away | ||
| === sraue_ is now known as sraue | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio__ | ||
| === Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === jbicha_ is now known as jbicha | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio__ | ||
| slangasek | cjwatson: hey, so I'm working on kernel autoremoval and I find that the kernel metapackages are all in section 'metapackages'... which means all their direct dependencies are marked as not-for-autoremoval. This is obviously the wrong result here, but I'm wondering if you know any reason why the kernel packages were in metapackages? | 23:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!