| === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang | ||
| rolling | fucking guess whos here | 02:49 |
|---|---|---|
| rolling | o.o | 02:49 |
| TheLordOfTime | rolling's spamming in #ubuntu | 02:52 |
| ubottu | wilee-nilee called the ops in #ubuntu (rolling) | 02:52 |
| rolling | Hahahahahahahaha | 02:52 |
| rolling | 4253030074535603 01/15 815 katarina matovic ADDRESS CITY state zip code PORTUGAL | 02:53 |
| TheLordOfTime | spamming here now too :/ | 02:53 |
| rolling | hill billys | 02:57 |
| rolling | !ops lol | 02:58 |
| rolling | !ops jrib wanking again | 02:58 |
| ubottu | rolling: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) | 02:58 |
| gnomefreak | anyone have the email for the IIRC handy? | 04:36 |
| Unit193 | irc-council@lists.ubuntu.com ? | 04:49 |
| gnomefreak | Unit193: thanks. does the ? mean you are not sure? | 04:56 |
| Unit193 | More that I wasn't sure if that's what you were looking for. | 04:57 |
| gnomefreak | Unit193: ah, im jusdt need to ask a favor due to kllost email on my end | 04:57 |
| gnomefreak | i will try it thanks | 04:58 |
| gnomefreak | ok swent that email, thanks again Unit193 | 05:07 |
| Unit193 | Sure. | 05:07 |
| ubottu | elkng called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic () | 07:36 |
| TheLordOfTime | anyone for -offtopic to deal with an excess flooder? | 08:09 |
| TheLordOfTime | (#ubuntu-offtopic that is) | 08:09 |
| TheLordOfTime | freenode fixed it, thanks. | 08:16 |
| dax | I set +b *!*@unaffiliated/fira$##fix_your_connection in #ubuntu-offtopic. I'll keep an eye on ##fix_your_connection and remove it when it's no longer applicable. | 08:17 |
| Jordan_U | dax: Thanks (I don't have op powers in -offtopic or I would have done it myself). | 08:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | so, question, since Jordan_U said other ops should chime in because its 2AM where he/she is: TheLordOfTime> question: is asking how to circumvent policies in place on a network on topic in #ubuntu? if not, rigo's asking how to get his remote desktop working so he can violate corporate-set policies on his environment. (read the scrollbacks and what I asked him) | 08:43 |
| Tm_T | TheLordOfTime: we usually are not aiding on breaking rules/laws | 08:45 |
| TheLordOfTime | Tm_T, that's what i thought, but i wanted an op to confirm that's the policy, if that's the case, you may need to poke rigo about that, given the subject matter and them confirming my suspicions | 08:45 |
| TheLordOfTime | <TheLordOfTime> rigo, sounds like you're wanting to bypass the proxy at your location to circumvent policies. | 08:45 |
| TheLordOfTime | <rigo> yes. it doesnt sounds like. it IS the thing :) | 08:45 |
| Tm_T | TheLordOfTime: but it's often very gray area, for example if they wouldn't mention for what they need certain technology for, we wouldn't know we would be aiding on circumventing policies | 08:46 |
| TheLordOfTime | Tm_T, they confirmed that's what they're trying to do when i suspected it. | 08:46 |
| TheLordOfTime | Tm_T, i'm highly wary of that stuff anyways. also, someone posted a forkbomb in -offtopic. | 08:46 |
| Tm_T | forkbomb is instaban | 08:46 |
| TheLordOfTime | then someone go deal with it? | 08:46 |
| TheLordOfTime | or, to work off of what Jordan_U told me, is there no -offtopic op on? | 08:47 |
| Tm_T | I am on it, I try talk sense first though | 08:48 |
| TheLordOfTime | that works. in any case, i confirmed what i thought, that helping to circumvent policies is against the general idea of the channel. | 08:48 |
| TheLordOfTime | i'll leave it to ops to decide how to handle rigo in #ubuntu, i'm going to return to stabbing my php5 fork :P | 08:48 |
| === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth | ||
| Seveas | noone4 seems to be something odd | 11:09 |
| Seveas | not active in channels, just attempting to initiate DCC chats | 11:10 |
| Seveas | doesn't seem to annoy too many people just yet, but look out for more reports? | 11:11 |
| Tm_T | I got that dcc chat too for ther record | 11:15 |
| IdleOne | Do did I | 12:20 |
| IdleOne | So* | 12:20 |
| IdleOne | How can I help you gordonjcp ? | 12:49 |
| IdleOne | gordonjcp: Please don't idle in here | 12:54 |
| gordonjcp | IdleOne: okay then | 12:54 |
| lhavelund | um. | 13:53 |
| lhavelund | wasn't RamchndraApta in -ot banned a few days ago | 13:54 |
| lhavelund | i'm pretty sure i did | 13:54 |
| lhavelund | id 52033 | 13:54 |
| lhavelund | i have forgotten how to look those up. | 13:54 |
| tsimpson | search for the id in the bantracker (web api) | 13:55 |
| lhavelund | that is vaguely helpful. | 13:55 |
| lhavelund | ._. | 13:55 |
| tsimpson | unless you mean @bansearch? | 13:57 |
| lhavelund | ideally i'd prefer to access it on the web api | 13:57 |
| lhavelund | but I've forgotten just about everything to do with it | 13:57 |
| tsimpson | then just search for the nick/mask | 13:58 |
| tsimpson | optionally in some channel, optionally by some op | 13:58 |
| lhavelund | where is the web interface located again? | 13:58 |
| tsimpson | type @btlogin | 13:58 |
| lhavelund | dang | 13:58 |
| lhavelund | i knew i'd forgotten something | 13:59 |
| lhavelund | no output | 13:59 |
| lhavelund | @btlogin | 13:59 |
| lhavelund | unless, of course, i need to do it in channel | 13:59 |
| mneptok | @login | 13:59 |
| ubottu | Error: You are not identified | 13:59 |
| lhavelund | @login | 13:59 |
| ubottu | Error: Your hostmask doesn't match or your password is wrong. | 13:59 |
| mneptok | that first | 13:59 |
| lhavelund | aha. | 13:59 |
| lhavelund | am I still in the db, tsimpson? | 14:01 |
| tsimpson | lhavelund: probably under your old nick | 14:01 |
| lhavelund | that is a possibility | 14:02 |
| === lhavelund is now known as MenZa | ||
| tsimpson | I'll add your current cloak to the bot, so it knows you | 14:03 |
| MenZa | perfect, cheers | 14:03 |
| === MenZa is now known as lhavelund | ||
| lhavelund | i didn't realise i hadn't done much operating since i nickchanged | 14:03 |
| tsimpson | see if you can @whoami | 14:04 |
| tsimpson | it should say menza | 14:05 |
| lhavelund | it does | 14:05 |
| lhavelund | :D | 14:05 |
| tsimpson | well that's my good deed for the day done :) | 14:06 |
| lhavelund | :D | 14:06 |
| lhavelund | appreciate it, tsimpson | 14:06 |
| lhavelund | how's things around here these days? | 14:06 |
| lhavelund | i see mneptok still lurks. some things never change. | 14:06 |
| lhavelund | Hi, RamchandraApte. | 14:06 |
| RamchandraApte | why did I get ... | 14:06 |
| lhavelund | I banned an alternative IP of yours the other night for attempted (and unsuccessful) trolling. | 14:07 |
| RamchandraApte | I didn't intend to troll | 14:07 |
| lhavelund | one moment. | 14:07 |
| lhavelund | i'm just finding the log. | 14:07 |
| lhavelund | also, flooding. | 14:08 |
| lhavelund | does "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" sound familiar? | 14:08 |
| RamchandraApte | yes | 14:08 |
| lhavelund | ok. | 14:08 |
| lhavelund | do you now understand why you were banned? | 14:08 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: but why did I get kicked again now? | 14:08 |
| lhavelund | Because you're just connecting from a different IP, evading the ban (whether intentional or not). | 14:08 |
| lhavelund | Getting a new IP doesn't simply give you a clean slate. | 14:09 |
| RamchandraApte | I didn't do it intentionally | 14:09 |
| RamchandraApte | We off the modem in the night so ... | 14:09 |
| mneptok | karma follows like the wheel follows the foot of the ox. | 14:09 |
| RamchandraApte | How long is the kick? | 14:09 |
| lhavelund | Until you promise me you'll shape up and a) not flood the channel, and b) not bait users into arguing with you. | 14:10 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: I'm not intenionally baiting users into arguing. | 14:10 |
| RamchandraApte | I thought it was just a discussion. | 14:10 |
| RamchandraApte | I won't flood the channel again | 14:10 |
| lhavelund | 2012-10-30T08:50:33 <RamchandraApte> linux is crap | 14:10 |
| lhavelund | 2012-10-30T08:50:55 <RamchandraApte> its a disorganised collection of projects patched (like band-aids) together by distros to make it workable | 14:10 |
| lhavelund | you're entitled to anopinoin, but that's baiting to me. | 14:10 |
| lhavelund | an opinion* | 14:10 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: ok, I was a little over-emotional but that is, in a lesser form, my opinion. | 14:11 |
| RamchandraApte | s/little/ | 14:11 |
| lhavelund | which is perfectly ok. but i suggest you present your thoughts a little more pragmatically. | 14:11 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: ok. | 14:11 |
| lhavelund | either way. assuming you'll be nice, i can lift the ban :) | 14:12 |
| lhavelund | just keep it in mind for future reference. | 14:12 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: remember that I am muted on #python-offtopic so think twice. | 14:12 |
| lhavelund | eh? | 14:12 |
| mneptok | RamchandraApte: coming to Linux-specific channels if that is your opinion is more than confusing to me | 14:12 |
| lhavelund | the #python* namespace has nothing to do with our channels or how we mod them. | 14:12 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: just giving you background info | 14:12 |
| lhavelund | we have our policies, they have theirs. | 14:12 |
| lhavelund | so | 14:13 |
| lhavelund | you're asking me to reconsider removing your ban? | 14:13 |
| RamchandraApte | yes | 14:13 |
| lhavelund | ok, i won't remove the ban, then | 14:13 |
| lhavelund | have a good day. | 14:13 |
| RamchandraApte | you too :-) | 14:14 |
| lhavelund | if there's nothing else i can help you with, please part the channel. :) | 14:14 |
| lhavelund | *ahem* | 14:14 |
| RamchandraApte | can you please unkick me | 14:14 |
| lhavelund | unkick you? | 14:15 |
| RamchandraApte | yes. | 14:15 |
| lhavelund | that's not technically possible | 14:15 |
| lhavelund | but let me get this straight | 14:16 |
| lhavelund | i say we can remove the ban if you agree to shape up. you ask me to reconsider, implying you're a troublesome user in the first place. i concede that, perhaps we should unban you. | 14:16 |
| lhavelund | let me try to explain the terminology | 14:16 |
| RamchandraApte | I just said you should think a bit more. | 14:16 |
| lhavelund | 1) a kick means you are removed from the channel. not barred from entering it. you can instantly re-join, UNLESS | 14:17 |
| RamchandraApte | I didn't mean to imply I was troublesome. | 14:17 |
| lhavelund | 2) you're banned. a ban disallows you from entering the channel. | 14:17 |
| lhavelund | ok, let's go back to square one, then. | 14:17 |
| lhavelund | we believe most of our users are happy to shape up if we talk to them first. | 14:17 |
| lhavelund | which is what we're doing with you now. | 14:17 |
| RamchandraApte | 14:17 | |
| lhavelund | so, a simple question. if i allow you priviliges to re-enter the channel, will you contribute constructively and positively to the atmosphere of the channel, and not break any of our rules? | 14:18 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: yes | 14:18 |
| lhavelund | right, good | 14:18 |
| lhavelund | one final request, then. | 14:18 |
| RamchandraApte | is the ubuntu code of conduct the rules? | 14:18 |
| lhavelund | please stop asking for help with your python projects in the -offtopic channel. there are python channels available, and they are both more relevant, and presumably more knowledgable of the issue. | 14:18 |
| lhavelund | !coc | 14:18 |
| ubottu | The Ubuntu Code of Conduct is a community etiquette document to which we ask all Ubuntu users to adhere | http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/conduct | For information on how to electronically sign the CoC, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SigningCodeofConduct | Watch http://static.screencasts.ubuntu.com/videos/2010/12/22/004-SigningCoC.ogv | 14:18 |
| lhavelund | !o4o | 14:18 |
| ubottu | Some topics are controversial and often end in negativity. Take care on subjects like war, race, religion, politics, gender, sexuality, drugs, potentially illegal activities and suicide. The topics are not banned; stating your position is ok, but trolling, baiting, hostility or repetition are not. If you are asked to stop, do so politely. Disputes to !appeals, please adhere to !freenode Policy and the !CodeOfConduct | 14:18 |
| lhavelund | the code of conduct and additional rules apply in !o4o | 14:19 |
| lhavelund | the code of conduct is a document we ask all community members and developers to adhere to. in the interest of practicalities and avoiding drama in -offtopic, we have additional rules in place to keep it a safe and comfortable place for everyone. | 14:19 |
| RamchandraApte | lhavelund: I did sign it though I lost my signature. | 14:20 |
| lhavelund | signing it is not necessary. | 14:20 |
| lhavelund | !guidelines | 14:20 |
| ubottu | The guidelines for using the Ubuntu channels can be found here: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Guidelines | 14:20 |
| lhavelund | there are additional guidelines there. | 14:20 |
| lhavelund | please take five minutes to read them, then return here. | 14:20 |
| RamchandraApte | OK thanks | 14:20 |
| RamchandraApte | done | 14:22 |
| lhavelund | you read 1959 words in less than two minutes. | 14:22 |
| lhavelund | try again. | 14:23 |
| RamchandraApte | I skimmed through it. | 14:23 |
| RamchandraApte | I read the main points of the Ubuntu code of conduct. | 14:23 |
| lhavelund | right. | 14:23 |
| lhavelund | either way. please behave accordingly in our channels, and there will be no more issues. | 14:23 |
| lhavelund | you are no longer banned, RamchandraApte. | 14:24 |
| lhavelund | feel free to re-enter the channel, and part this one. | 14:24 |
| lhavelund | have a good day. | 14:24 |
| RamchandraApte | OK bye | 14:24 |
| RamchandraApte | you too | 14:24 |
| lhavelund | i really haven't done one of those in far too long. | 14:25 |
| IdleOne | lhavelund: remove the original ban while you're at it :) | 14:25 |
| lhavelund | i suppose i should, yes | 14:25 |
| lhavelund | thanks, IdleOne | 14:25 |
| IdleOne | thank you. | 14:25 |
| lhavelund | sorted | 14:26 |
| tsimpson | lhavelund: by the way, there is #ubuntu-ops-team now too | 14:27 |
| IdleOne | supa sekrit channel | 14:27 |
| bazhang | <Wug> noone4: don't dcc people randomly | 14:53 |
| bazhang | another complaint about him | 14:53 |
| * lhavelund hugs bazhang | 14:55 | |
| bazhang | got him in PM | 14:55 |
| bazhang | @mark #ubuntu michealPW] (~michealpw@165.154.108.196): michealPW constantly offtopic, warned repeatedly | 14:57 |
| ubottu | The operation succeeded. | 14:57 |
| bazhang | lhavelund, nice to see you back | 14:57 |
| lhavelund | bazhang: :) good to see you. | 14:58 |
| lhavelund | bazhang: i was never gone, just very inactive. | 14:59 |
| bazhang | even the floodbots are getting d c c spam from noone4 | 15:14 |
| Tm_T | hi lhavelund | 15:39 |
| Tm_T | what, things change around here? | 15:40 |
| AlanBell | http://ubottu.com/ircc/2012/11/03/ban-management-changes/ | 16:41 |
| AlanBell | ^^ changes :) | 16:41 |
| knome | c-c-c-changes | 16:41 |
| knome | hullo AlanBell :) | 16:41 |
| AlanBell | hi knome | 16:41 |
| bazhang | augh | 16:44 |
| bazhang | he just gave his teamviewer info on the open channel | 16:44 |
| ubottu | bekks called the ops in #ubuntu (desu) | 17:09 |
| ubottu | FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (mass join (1715 users, 4 overflows, 1719 limit)) | 18:01 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (mass join (1710 users, 4 overflows, 1714 limit)) | 18:02 |
| ubottu | FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (mass join (1717 users, 4 overflows, 1721 limit)) | 18:02 |
| === kloeri_ is now known as kloeri | ||
| jrib | ikonia: you sure he didn't mean he wouldn't mislead people anymore? Could read that both ways to be honest | 20:43 |
| ikonia | nope, not sure | 20:44 |
| ikonia | but fed up with these fools "it would be easier to uninstall binaries on arch than it would on ubuntu" | 20:44 |
| ikonia | so I don't see a loss | 20:44 |
| ikonia | sorry if that seems harsh | 20:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!