=== yofel_ is now known as yofel === philballew_ is now known as philballew [07:42] good morning === Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio__ [10:08] ESphynx: yeah they removed, than put it back in for the fs types they found no substitues for (fat and hfs or something like that....) [10:09] ESphynx: I was more after this cover http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:50ShadesofGreyCoverArt.jpg [10:09] bdrung: : I was more after this cover http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:50ShadesofGreyCoverArt.jpg === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ [12:35] Hi, if I have a python package which supports both py2 and py3 in the same package should I distribute it as python-abc or python3-abc or both? Thanks, Andy [12:36] Is it a program or a module? [12:36] it is a library really [12:36] Then the Debian Python policy requires that you distribute python-abc and python3-abc [12:37] ok thanks :) [12:38] ahayzen: http://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide may help [12:38] cjwatson: thank you === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === lynxman_ is now known as lynxman === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ [16:40] Who again made me put my email address on packages.ubuntu.com? [16:40] Laney, was that you? I officially hate you now. :) [16:40] Rhonda, lol, did you get emails about given packages? [16:40] TheLordOfTime: I receive tons of spam. [16:41] Rhonda: hahaha [16:41] heh [16:41] I didn't tell you to do that, I just pointed out that Frank's was out of date :-) [16:41] I have rhonda@debian.org all over the web, and my private mail address. [16:41] It seems the @ubuntu.com mail host doesn't do any spam counter measures, at all. [16:42] um... [16:42] afaik that's just a webforward [16:42] Well, his address wasn't out of date. He might (or might not) read mails there still. It doesn't bounce. ;) [16:42] spam handling would need to be done at your client [16:42] as a contact for that site [16:42] He still has access. :) [16:51] *sigh* [16:51] Now someone asks me about some intrepid cd image download … [16:51] * Rhonda nibbles even more on Laney [16:52] heh [16:52] you could just delete the contact info [17:04] Rhonda: I would suggest address obfuscation if you haven't done that already [17:24] "this website is maintained in teh intarwebz. shout out your patches and eventually they will be picked up out of thin air." [18:15] so a debian/changelog, you just keep adding to the top, right? [18:16] yes [18:17] jtaylor: thanks. can/should I put multiple lines in there? [18:17] put in as many lines as you need [18:17] too much doc is better than too little [18:17] and use dch to edit it [18:17] k. [18:46] bdrung: another u-d-t upload for the syncpackage & requestsync bugs? [19:41] is launchpad fubar atm? I can't access any bzr repos [19:49] ahh, now it's working [20:09] Why is dpkg-symbols generating the first line (middle thing) as libecere instead of libecere0? :S [20:15] great you can't login to launchpad with opera now? ... [20:16] shouldn't have deleted my cookies ... [20:24] jtaylor sorry to bug you man, but any clue about that libecere vs libecere0? =) [20:25] how does it look like? [20:26] dpkg-gensymbols is giving me [20:26] libEDA.so.0 libecere #MINVER# [20:26] instead of [20:26] libEDA.so.0 libecere0 #MINVER# [20:26] as I currently have in my debian/ symbols files... [20:26] just wondering why? [20:26] I'm running: dpkg-gensymbols -plibecere0 -v0.44.01 -Odebian/libecere0.symbols [20:27] also it's outputting symbols for 'all' my libs in that file (even the ones from other packages)... I guess it uses everything it built? I can just delete the unrelated ones... I remember I had to do this last time as well [20:27] but I don't remember about the libecere vs libecere0 ... maybe I had to add the 0 myself as well? I can't recall [20:29] just put the 0 there by hand [20:30] fair enough =) thanks. was just wondering :P [20:30] not sure why it outputs stuff for all libraries [20:30] didn't use gensymbols in a while [20:30] I built all... so. [20:30] it maybe be fishing from the same spot where they're all together :S [20:30] taking notes this time lol [20:40] tumbleweed: yes. can you please tag 0.144? [20:48] bdrung: sure === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ [20:51] tumbleweed: will you backport the patches for syncpackage & requestsync to quantal? [20:53] bdrung: yeah [21:18] hi === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ [22:20] I just got a weird mail about a sru for precise being accepted in raring? [22:20] an sru I did in july [22:21] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/raring-changes/2012-November/000621.html [22:21] is something wrong with the archive? [22:22] hm its probably because the sru has a to high version number oO [22:22] how did that happen [22:23] you took the new upstream release === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw [22:24] shouldnt it go to Q too? [22:24] yes [22:24] might want to ping to make sure it happens [22:24] well it doesn't really [22:24] it doesn'T need a rebuild [22:24] for version number sanity [22:24] it can probably be copied [22:25] did someone copy it to raring to fix my mistake? [22:25] looks like slangasek was doing some copying up [22:26] yes [22:26] and have just copied to precise too [22:26] you mean quantal? [22:26] quantal? [22:26] yeah [22:26] that thing [22:26] k thx [22:26] good stuff [22:27] jtaylor: fwiw the correct version number here would have been either 2012.1-0ubuntu0.1 [22:27] s/either // [22:27] yes [22:27] also the SRU team should have caught it, meh [22:28] I really make to many mistakes recently ... === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ [22:34] package addition request: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2012-October/007340.html [22:40] ? [22:43] maxiaojun: it is best to get your package into ubuntu via debian [22:43] see http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers [22:43] ok [22:49] I'd like to ask, beside MIR, is there a similar process for multiverse to restricted? [22:57] I'm concerning VAAPI stuff. [22:58] They stay in universe/multiverse now [22:59] whats the procedure to maintain an ubuntu universe package? I'm looking right now at crash : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crash [23:02] arges: that package is still maintained in debian [23:02] http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crash.html [23:02] you could do the merge to raring [23:03] jtaylor, ok. how do I request that the version in unstable be uploaded to precise to raring? [23:03] jtaylor, sure how do I start that then? [23:08] arges: http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/udd-merging.html [23:09] merging is one of the more challenging tasks, it may not be the best to start with [23:09] jtaylor, thanks. yea shouldn't be a problem [23:09] jtaylor, i assume i file a bug with this branch linked, then get the attention of somebody who can upload? [23:09] yes [23:09] cool [23:10] when you propose the branch for merging it goes onto the sponsoring queue automatically [23:10] for bugs you subscribe ubuntu-sponsors for that === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [23:48] jtaylor, i'm actually really looking for a debian sync of that package. i assume that's different than bzr merge [23:49] ahh i found requestsync [23:50] arges: are you a developer? [23:50] then you could use syncpackage.... [23:50] xnox, no i'm not [23:50] * xnox thought you might be already =) [23:51] xnox, i have prepped my wiki page, so one day... === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha