[02:56] <resno> ive got a server install but i want to go more minimal.. can i easily remove apps or should i reinstall?
[02:57] <patdk-lap> you can easily uninstall
[02:58] <patdk-lap> though I always do minimal installs
[02:59] <resno> whats the easiest way to remove those extra packages?
[02:59] <resno> i had like wpa-supplicant installed
[02:59] <resno> patdk-lap: ^
[03:00] <patdk-lap> I think wpa-supplicant is in minimal also
[03:00] <resno> really?
[03:00] <patdk-lap> maybe not
[03:01] <patdk-lap> apt-get purge fuse.* libfuse.* mlocate ppp.* rsyslog ufw dhcp.* libntfs.*
[03:01] <patdk-lap> that is what I normally remove from a minimal install
[03:01] <resno> you even remove stuff from a minimal install?
[03:01] <patdk-lap> hmm, it's a server, I don't need dhcp, fuse, ntfs, mlocate, ppp
[03:02] <resno> whats rsyslog for?
[03:02] <patdk-lap> normal logs
[03:02]  * jdstrand_ raises eyebrows at removing the syslogger
[03:02] <patdk-lap> jdstrand_, that was tune for using syslog-ng
[03:03] <patdk-lap> that is installed on the next line :)
[03:04] <resno> patdk-lap: should i just reinstall and use minimal? or can i easily weed out the extra installs
[03:05] <resno> err, packages*
[03:06] <patdk-lap> I dunno about easily
[03:06] <resno> you use puppet?
[03:08] <patdk-lap> nope, don't do enough to care
[03:09] <patdk-lap> and most of my vm's are all different, not the same
[03:09] <patdk-lap> so really not worth it for me really
[03:13] <resno> ill just try using tasksel. hopefully thatll bring it down a bit
[03:15] <patdk-lap> hmm?
[03:15] <patdk-lap> tasksel only increases it
[03:18] <resno> it had "basic server" checked before.. so i unchecked it...
[03:47] <resno> so, i broke the vms network connection, any suggestions to how to recover it?
[08:54] <koolhead17> philballew:
[08:55] <philballew> can I use your picture of the the openstack book?
[08:56] <philballew> koolhead17,
[08:56] <koolhead17> philballew: which one
[08:58] <philballew> koolhead17, hum, did you post a pic with your new openstack book review?
[08:58] <philballew> if not, maybe I am loosing it
[08:59] <koolhead17> philballew: heh ur. i don`t see any pic there :P
[08:59] <philballew> ah, heres my review
[08:59] <philballew> http://philipballew.wordpress.com/?p=195&preview=true
[09:00] <koolhead17> 404
[09:00] <philballew> nice!
[09:01] <philballew> http://philipballew.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/openstack-cloud-computing-cokbook-review/
[09:01] <philballew> koolhead17,
[09:03] <philballew> koolhead17, thoughts?
[09:04] <koolhead17> philballew: looks great. can u tweet the new link so tht i can RT :P
[09:06] <philballew> koolhead17, yeah the link now is: http://philipballew.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/openstack-cloud-computing-cookbook-review/
[10:40] <balboah> my god the "scanning disks" step before partitioning are taking minutes for my new server install
[11:06] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1075917 in lxc (universe) "[wishlist] Support for lxc.network.gateway in precise" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1075917
[13:06] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1075948 in cinder (main) "Cinder installation depends on installing Git" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1075948
[13:37] <Darkstar1> Hi guys.
[13:39] <Darkstar1> Can I (or rather is it wise to) apply fail2ban on the apache port? I ask because the site was getting about 3.5k fake requests per min, so we called the provider and he said it was nothing special, and to install fail2ban
[14:03] <Delemas> I just rolled 12.10 out as a DNS server. At every login it complains it will check /dev/sda1 (my ext2 256M boot drive) for errors. The drive is fine and a full fsck from a rescue disk finds nothing. Anyone else seen this?
[14:18] <ironm> hello. Please allow me one question:  I have 8 ethernet interfaces on ubuntu-server 12.04 KVM host. The host doesn't support the IOMMU flag in the BIOS. I would like use bonding of interfaces (4 groups with 2 interfaces each). Is it recommended to do it on the KVM or VM side? (due to performance)
[14:47] <danieljs> Hello. I'm trying to install phantomjs under ubuntu 10.04 x64. I get "Segmentation fault" everytime I try to run it. Anyone knows what's the problem ?
[14:49] <holstein> danieljs: pastebin the entire error if convenient
[14:49] <danieljs> ok
[14:49] <danieljs> :~/phantomjs-1.7.0-linux-x86_64/bin# ./phantomjs
[14:49] <danieljs> PhantomJS has crashed. Please read the crash reporting guide at https://code.goo
[14:49] <danieljs> gle.com/p/phantomjs/wiki/CrashReporting and file a bug report at https://code.go
[14:49] <danieljs> ogle.com/p/phantomjs/issues/entry with the crash dump file attached: /tmp/6dc0a3
[14:49] <danieljs> 05-25d0-0a0c-565d487d-295cb741.dmp
[14:49] <danieljs> Segmentation fault
[14:49] <fego> !pastebin
[14:50] <danieljs> ok. sorry.
[14:50] <holstein> danieljs: where did you get that application? i would try going one version or the other to troubleshoot
[14:51] <danieljs> PhantomJS has crashed. Please read the crash reporting guide at https://code.goo
[14:51] <danieljs> gle.com/p/phantomjs/wiki/CrashReporting and file a bug report at https://code.go
[14:51] <danieljs> ogle.com/p/phantomjs/issues/entry with the crash dump file attached: /tmp/6dc0a3
[14:51] <danieljs> 05-25d0-0a0c-565d487d-295cb741.dmp
[14:51] <danieljs> Segmentation fault
[14:51] <danieljs> oops
[14:51] <danieljs> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1339977/
[14:51] <danieljs> like that ?
[14:51] <holstein> danieljs: yup :)
[14:51] <danieljs> :-)
[14:51] <rbasak> phantomjs is packaged - 1.4 in precise, 1.6 in quantal. You could try using that unless you have the latest version
[14:51] <danieljs> I use phantomjs 1.7
[14:52] <holstein> danieljs: sure, but ubuntu is not packaging that.. and you'll need to go to the package maintainer to troubleshoot
[14:52] <danieljs> tried the packaged version. also tried the build
[14:52] <TheLordOfTime> did you build from source for that?
[14:52] <holstein> danieljs: i would try the one in the repos to troubleshoot
[14:52] <danieljs> that ? https://code.google.com/p/phantomjs/issues/detail?id=860&thanks=860&ts=1352298059
[14:54] <danieljs> emm. so the problem is that phantom 1.7 does not work with ubuntu 10.04 x64 ?
[14:56] <danieljs> I does work on my local ubuntu 12.04. I must install phantomjs on our server, which is ubuntu 10.04.
[14:56] <danieljs> I'm new with this stuff.
[14:57] <holstein> danieljs: i would ask the maintainer.. it might also be easier to upgrade to 12.04
[14:57] <holstein> danieljs: you can also try older versions of phantomjs and see if they are more compatible with ubuntu 10.04
[14:57] <danieljs> I asked my boss to update to 12.04
[14:58] <danieljs> we can't do that for some reson..
[14:58] <holstein> danieljs: well... you will at some point
[14:58] <holstein> danieljs: im not saying that is the only solution
[14:58] <holstein> im just saying, the package maintainer is the best place to get help.. it will likely be suggested to try the most recent version
[14:58] <danieljs> you mean to talk with the maintainer of phantomjs ?
[14:59] <holstein> danieljs: correct.. the person that is responsible for the software
[14:59] <holstein> danieljs: i would try the packaged version that rbasak mentioned as well
[15:03] <danieljs> precise and quantal are names of alternative packages ? do I get it right ?
[15:04] <holstein> danieljs: those are releases... precise is 12.04... quantal is 12.10
[15:05] <danieljs> aha (-; oops
[15:05] <holstein> danieljs: the newer versions of phantomjs dont have to support ubuntu 10.04
[15:06] <holstein> i always say, if the software is all open, then anything is possible.. but the question is, is it worth it
[15:06] <danieljs> but I am using the new version of phantom - 1.7
[15:07] <holstein> 10.04 will reach EOL.. you *will* want to upgrade to 12.04 at some point.. this might be the easiest way to get a safe and secure setup for a production environment
[15:07] <holstein> danieljs: you are using software that may or may not be intended for 10.04
[15:08] <holstein> danieljs: if it were me, i would ask the maintainer about 10.04 support.. i would look at how i built/installed.. i would try older versions that might be 10.04 appropriate for troubleshooting
[15:08] <holstein> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/phantomjs/bFWkivibo5w
[15:09] <hallyn> ivoks: around?
[15:09] <ivoks> hallyn: yes?
[15:09] <ivoks> a bug?
[15:09] <ivoks> the bug?
[15:13] <hallyn> ivoks: d'oh, where'd the number go...  one sec :)
[15:14] <hallyn> ivoks: yeah bug 882485 , is that someting on your radar?
[15:14] <uvirtbot`> Launchpad bug 882485 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Sanlock" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/882485
[15:14] <ivoks> hallyn: not really, but i can look at it
[15:15] <ivoks> hallyn: sounds like something that would fit into ubuntu-ha-maintainers ppa
[15:16] <hallyn> ivoks: meaning i should ping roaksoax ?
[15:16] <ivoks> hallyn: or me :)
[15:16] <hallyn> ivoks: but it's packaged in debian, so seems like it should be fine for universe...
[15:16] <hallyn> heh, great :)
[15:18] <danieljs> holstein: thanks a lot for the support.
[15:20] <Darkstar1> Can I (or rather is it wise to) apply fail2ban on the apache port? I ask because the site was getting about 3.5k fake requests per min, so we called the provider and he said it was nothing special, and to install fail2ban
[16:05] <andresama> hi
[16:05] <andresama> i am having some troubles setting an startup script on ubuntu 12.04
[16:05] <andresama> its the beanstalkd service
[16:08] <hallyn> (deep sigh) all right i guess i'll go verify the lxc precise-proposed bugs, they're holding up new srus
[16:12] <SpamapS> andresama: can you be more specific?
[16:20] <andresama> yes, i just installed beanstalkd
[16:20] <andresama> with apt-get
[16:20] <andresama> but if i reboot the server it does not start automatically
[16:21] <andresama> so i was trying chkconfig with no luck, and i saw ubuntu is using upstart
[16:21] <andresama> with upstart how can i set this service to start
[17:01] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1076031 in lxc (universe) "ubuntu-cloud options parsing bugs" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1076031
[17:03] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1076028 in maas (main) "maas-cluster-controller should conflict with tftpd-hpa" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1076028
[17:05] <Darkstar1> Anyone here with fail2ban experience?
[17:06] <Darkstar1> I need to know how to configure it to mitigate the effects of a DDoS attack
[17:10] <patdk-wk> hmm, install it, it works :)
[17:18] <hallyn> SpamapS: so 1 of 7 bugs in the lxc precise sru was not actually fixed.  I'll upload a new version with that missing bit in, with bumped version #.
[17:18] <Darkstar1> patdk-lap: it does I'm sure. Already seen some bans in the iptables, but It hasn't really mitigated this DDos
[17:19] <hallyn> SpamapS: i'm pushing version with the final bit in, with bumped version #
[17:19] <patdk-wk> Darkstar1, maybe you don't get what it does, fail2ban is not anti-ddos
[17:19] <Darkstar1> patdk-wk: I'm still getting a lot of fake page requests showing up in the error log from certain IPs
[17:20] <hallyn> SpamapS: if i do so, do i need to do a -r<two-versions-prior> to get all the bugs in changelog?  or can you accept the 0.7.5-3ubuntu64 for the 6 fixed bugs?  (i expec tnot, but ....)
[17:21] <SpamapS> hallyn: so 1 wasn't fixed? Did it regress things?
[17:21] <hallyn> SpamapS: nope, just a missing bit
[17:21] <hallyn> (missing switch fromnetstat -xa to netstat -xl)
[17:21] <SpamapS> hallyn: seems like it would be better to release with 6 fixes and 1 non-fix that doesn't hurt anything than to delay all those fixes for another week+
[17:21] <SpamapS> hallyn: ahh, but the changelog says it fixed that one?
[17:21] <hallyn> SpamapS: that'd be great. do i just manually re-mark the nonfixed bug as not fixed?
[17:21] <hallyn> yeah
[17:22] <SpamapS> hallyn: bug#?
[17:22] <Darkstar1> patdk-wk: even if it's not I would've thought it would've picked up a few of the ip addersses that are requesting fake pages more than 50 times in the minute
[17:22] <SpamapS> hallyn: I'd rather see the P's and Q's minded, but if its something minor..
[17:22] <hallyn> bug 1043018
[17:22] <uvirtbot`> Launchpad bug 1043018 in lxc "lxc-ls lists running containers multiple times" [Low,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1043018
[17:23] <patdk-wk> Darkstar1, well, by default it doesn't block anything, did you enable it to? and did you teach it to know what a fake page to block is?
[17:25] <patdk-wk> yep, fail2ban doesn't come with a script to block *missing* pages
[17:28] <Darkstar1> patdk-wk: I meant missing page requests.
[17:29] <Darkstar1> Actually those should turn up a 404 as well, So I just need to "teach it to block an ip that generates too many 404s in a certain amount of time. Right??
[17:29] <patdk-wk> yep
[17:31]  * Darkstar1 sighs another long tutorial reading :/
[17:31] <hallyn> ivoks: sorry, one more - bug 1075950 - do you remember having to deal with that in the past?
[17:31] <uvirtbot`> Launchpad bug 1075950 in libvirt "Starting clustered lvm vg pool fails with status 5" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1075950
[17:32] <xnox> hmm....
[17:33] <ivoks> hallyn: monitoring?
[17:33] <ivoks> hallyn: yes... i've seen bugs about it
[17:33] <ivoks> hallyn: we have patched lvm's code, instead of setting configuration option
[17:34] <ivoks> hallyn: so, even if one sets monitoring to y in lvm.conf, this is being ignored
[17:35] <ivoks> hallyn: one needs to explicitly add --monitor y to lvm cli
[17:35] <ivoks> hallyn: monitoring-default-off.patch
[17:35] <ivoks> hallyn: in lvm2
[17:35] <hallyn> ivoks: so do you think i should mark the bug as affecting lvm2?
[17:36] <ivoks> hallyn: yes, it's a lvm2 bug...
[17:36] <ivoks> not a libvirt one
[17:36] <hallyn> ivoks: <nod>  thanks
[17:36] <ivoks> we have simillar problem with clvm in pacemaker environment
[17:37] <ivoks> we patched pacmaker's OCF to explicitly use --monitor y
[17:37] <hallyn> all right i'll mark it against lvm2, and i guess put down a note to patch it myself in 10 days if noone else (actual maintainer) gets to it
[17:41] <ivoks> hallyn: good luck :)
[17:44] <hallyn> heh, thanks
[17:49] <SpamapS> hallyn: You know just upload another lxc to precise-proposed with bug #1043018 fixed (use -v back to the pre-proposed version as usual), I'll queue-jump it to get it into precise today, and we'll get it out to users by next Wednesday
[17:49] <uvirtbot`> Launchpad bug 1043018 in lxc "lxc-ls lists running containers multiple times" [Low,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1043018
[17:50] <SpamapS> hallyn: I'm starting my SRU run here in a few minutes anyway, so its good timing. Just ping me when its uploaded.
[17:54] <hallyn> SpamapS: thanks, pushed
[18:26] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1076075 in maas (main) "maas_cluster.conf ends up with the wrong URL after upgrade." [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1076075
[18:29] <Darkstar1> is there anyplace where I can see who initiated a server restart?
[18:46] <Darkstar1> Can anyone help me with my fail2ban config? This: http://fpaste.org/4DSC/ isn't working
[18:52] <mgw> Darkstar1: I think you could surmise who restarted by looking at auth.log and syslog
[18:53] <Darkstar1> mgw: ok thx
[18:53] <SpamapS> Darkstar1: restarts are root level activities, so.. you know.. root did it. Whoever was acting as root.. well.. auth.log would definitley show su's and sudo's..
[18:54] <mgw> in particular arth.log
[18:54] <mgw> e.g., from one of my systems:
[18:54] <mgw> auth.log.1:Oct 29 12:31:14 ubuntu sudo:  xxx : TTY=tty1 ; PWD=/home/xxx ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/reboot
[18:54] <mgw> so grep all your auth logs for reboot
[18:55] <Darkstar1> mgw: just did. No output
[18:56] <mgw> What is your uptime? That will pinpoint when it was rebooted
[18:57] <Darkstar1> mgw: I know when it was rebooted. as the time shows up in the output to last
[18:58] <mgw> do you see anything interesting in syslog just before that time?
[18:59] <mgw> Darkstar1: ^
[18:59] <Darkstar1> sec checking
[19:02] <sliddjur> Can I get help with ACL here or is there some special channel for those matters
[19:17] <baldfat> what is the best practice for having a console close? My  Linux server has about 20 consoles open from former ssh sessions that timed out.
[20:16] <mdeslaur> SpamapS: am I crazy, or did we ship precise's php5 with magic_quotes turned on by default?
[20:38] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1052677 in horizon "Error when clicking on OpenStack logo" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1052677
[20:43] <koolhead17> do we have zeromq supported with ubuntu pkg
[20:45] <sarnold> koolhead17: apt-cache search zeromq returns libzmq1 and libzmq-dev, among other packages
[20:45] <sarnold> koolhead17: note it is in universe, so community supported
[20:46] <koolhead17> sarnold, AFAIK i remember it was decided it will go to main sometime in R i wonder if i wrongly interpreted it :(
[20:47] <mdeslaur> SpamapS: oh, only for CGI though
[20:47] <sarnold> koolhead17: could be, could be, my tools make it easy to see current easier than future :)
[20:47] <koolhead17> sarnold, true :)
[21:10] <SpamapS> mdeslaur: IIRC, thats one of those "CGI is f*'d anyway" things
[21:10] <mdeslaur> SpamapS: hehe
[21:11] <SpamapS> There was some rason
[21:11] <SpamapS> reason even
[21:11] <mdeslaur> SpamapS: it was just unexpected...and I originally thought it was turned on for more than just CGI
[21:11] <mdeslaur> SpamapS: I've stopped panicking now :P
[21:13] <SpamapS> mdeslaur: :)
[21:13] <SpamapS> "DON'T PANIC: its just php"
[21:13] <mdeslaur> hehehe
[21:13] <mdeslaur> "The uneasy feeling you are experiencing is perfectly normal."
[21:26] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1076107 in requests (main) "Upgrade to new upstream version 0.14.2" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1076107
[21:39] <JoeyG> Hi Team, I'm hoping someone can help. I'm trying to install Ubuntu Server 12.04.1 on an Apple Mac Mini 2012 (which according to MacOSX has an 'AppleBCM5701Ethernet'. The installer can't find the interface, and I can't get the interface to work once Ubuntu installed. Any suggestions? There was some other oddities with the 2012 Mac Mini that I posted about here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=12340780#post12340780
[21:42] <sd> Hello i need help with mod_proxy in apache anyone can help me, i try to run two server on port 80
[21:42] <sd> i can pay for your time
[21:43] <sarnold> JoeyG: have you tried loading all the modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/ ?
[21:44] <JoeyG> sarnold: just the tg3 ones as apparantly that's what is applicable, but I will try load all of them now
[21:44] <sarnold> JoeyG: there's a handful there, just run 'modprobe b44` and so forth ...
[21:44] <sarnold> JoeyG: tg3 was going to be my guess for first choice, but .. you never know. :/
[21:48] <JoeyG> no luck unfortunately :(
[21:48] <JoeyG> It's quite annoying as I have a 2010 Mac Mini here that Ubuntu 12.04.1 installed on perfect, but I need to be able to support the new ones as that's all I'll be able to buy >_<
[21:50] <sd> hello are there a apache expert here?
[21:51] <sarnold> sd: it may work better to ask a specific question
[21:52] <sd> i Have two webserver, i want to run all websitet in port 80
[21:52] <sd> i use apache mod_proxy there i have problem for setup there
[21:53] <JoeyG> sd: What is the purpose of 2 web servers? Redundancy? Load Balance? 2 Different applications?
[21:54] <JoeyG> You haven't really explained a situation where mod_proxy should be used yet
[21:54] <sd> No same server
[21:54] <sd> but i want to run in same ip
[21:54] <sd> so i have two webservers..
[21:55] <JoeyG> so 1 physical server
[21:55] <JoeyG> but 2 instances of apache? Or 1 instance of apache but 2 different websites?
[21:56] <sd> Yes joeyG
[21:56] <sd> Server 2 are to testing
[21:56] <sd> and 1 to orginale website.
[21:56] <sarnold> why does a testing website also need to be served on port 80?
[21:57] <sd> not really testing but small other sites
[21:57] <JoeyG> sd: if you are using only 1 server, sounds like you would be better off using VirtualHosts on the one instance of apache?
[21:58] <sd> Yes i know JoeyG
[21:58] <JoeyG> So why not use VirtualHosts?
[21:58] <sd> I want to use seperate machines
[21:58] <ablyss> He thinks mod_proxy will allow him to run two apache servers on port 80
[21:58] <sd> because dont want to come problem in orginale server.
[21:58] <sd> Yes ablyss
[21:59] <ablyss> when in fact mod_proxy does external redirects
[21:59] <sd> So what are solution for that, i have only 1 ip?
[22:00] <ablyss> 1 machine ?
[22:00] <sd> 2 machines
[22:01] <ablyss> you need a router than can forward port 80 to two machines first.  What u using for router?
[22:02] <ablyss> er, never mind that.
[22:03] <sd> ablyss i using router
[22:03] <sd> cisgo router
[22:05] <ablyss> basically you want to use mod_proxy to forward a virtual host to another machine
[22:06] <JoeyG> WTF sd, you said 1 physical server.
[22:07] <JoeyG> So you have one public facing server, and one non public facing server, you want public facing server to proxy requests on that are not hosted locally on that server, to the private server.
[22:25] <sd> Can i use htacces?
[22:39] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1076155 in tomcat7 (main) "tomcat7 from aptitude repositories does not deploy or explode applicationsapplications" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1076155
[23:20] <sd> hello how can i reset my mysql server?
[23:24] <sarnold> sd: what do you mean by 'reset'?