[09:59] <dholbach> hello everybody
[09:59] <davidcalle> dholbach, hey
[10:01] <dholbach> didrocks just sent me here to talk to trevinho and andyrock about my tomboy note which does not turn up in alt-tab or the unity launcher - but it seems they're not around - anyone else interested in this or any debug info I might have?
[10:06] <Mirv> dholbach: I pinged trevinho so he might join here at some point
[10:07] <dholbach> thanks Mirv
[10:15] <popey> dholbach, 12.10 or 12.04?
[10:15] <popey> dholbach, i have had tomboy not come to the front sometimes, not had the alt-tab issue though recently
[10:25] <dholbach> popey, 12.10
[10:26] <seb128> dholbach, is that happening all the time or is that a one time thing?
[10:26] <dholbach> seb128, I don't think I ever saw it before, but it's happening right now
[10:27] <seb128> dholbach, popey: I doubt it's due to tomboy, rather a bamf/unity issue that happens sometime ... I had xchat not listed during UDS, I showed that to didrocks who said he got that issue sometimes as well
[10:28] <dholbach> I just fear that if I restart my session it will all be fine again, so I thought to best debug it now
[10:28] <didrocks> yeah, confirming, not limited to tomoby
[10:28] <didrocks> tomboy*
[10:29] <didrocks> dholbach: right, would be interesting to have Trevinho online
[10:30] <dholbach> brb
[10:30] <popey> oh sure, I appreciate it's not limited to tomboy, but there's some specific tomboy related window raising things that I haven't seen with other apps too
[10:31] <Daviey> 3muppet11
[10:31] <didrocks> Daviey: time to change your password? :p
[10:31] <Zhenech> Daviey, hi root
[10:31] <Daviey> didrocks: thankfully, it wasn't a password :)
[10:32] <didrocks> heh
[10:34] <kamstrup> Hey larsu - did you see the thread on Gtk's upcoming notifications API? There's some stuff there that could be quite relevant for your current endaevours
[10:34] <kamstrup> larsu: on gtk-devel
[10:36] <larsu> kamstrup, I did see the original message and the design spec, haven't looked at the responses yet. Thanks for the pointer!
[11:00] <mvo> unity trunk fails for me to build for me in quantal - known issue? or excepted
[11:01] <jaaso> Same issue, I have problem with this line BGHash.cpp  "DECLARE_LOGGER(logger, "unity.bghash");"
[11:01] <jaaso> Did you build nux ?
[11:02] <mvo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1339512/
[11:02] <mvo> yeah
[11:02] <mvo> same line
[11:03] <didrocks> as usual, ensure you have latest nux (and compiz) :)
[11:03] <jaaso> I have laterst nux
[11:04] <jaaso> so I need I guess and build latest compiz :/
[11:04] <mvo> heh :)
[11:04]  * mvo is missing the latest nux
[11:10] <gatox> good morning!
[11:39] <conscioususer> mpt: ping
[11:53] <Trevinho> dholbach: I've been told you've some bamf issues... what's up?
[11:54] <dholbach> ciao Trevinho
[11:54] <dholbach> Trevinho, my tomboy note does not turn up in alt-tab or the unity launcher
[11:54] <dholbach> nautilus earlier too
[12:08] <jaaso> didrocks, sorry for bothering you. I installed laterst compiz but again have same issue.
[12:08] <dholbach> Trevinho, any debug info you might need?
[12:11] <didrocks> jaaso: I think you should ask bregma once he's online, he's probably more aware than I on that (and I don't really have the time to look at it today, sorry)
[12:11] <jaaso> ok, thanks
[12:17] <bregma> jaaso, sounds like some recent nux logger changes haven't propagated into unity yet:  our automated daily builds have been down for a few days so it hasn't shown up as a failure yet
[12:17] <jaaso> Ah :(
[12:19] <bregma> the builders were fixed a few hours ago, so if there's a mismatch it will show up in a bit
[12:44] <dholbach> Trevinho, or is there somebody else I should ping about this?
[13:02] <dholbach> Trevinho, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bamf/+bug/1075952 ← anything I should add?
[13:18] <dholbach> Trevinho, popey: Using the split-screen view (left half firefox and left half tomboy) brought tomboy back to alt-tab and the unity launcher. :-/
[13:19] <dholbach> so I'm afraid my test case is gone for debugging
[13:29] <gatox> dholbach, bregma could it be that the unity compilation is broken?
[13:30] <gatox> it seems that BGHash is trying to use logger which should be included from NuxCore, but it says that is not declared
[13:54] <jaaso> I like that now panel height is in unity-shared folder. Latest release that I was hacking was 11.04 and panel_height was a messy and all over code.
[14:33] <Trevinho> dholbach: oh, sorry I had some troubles... Checking now
[14:34] <Trevinho> dholbach: could be possible that bamfdaemon crashed?
[14:34] <Trevinho> dholbach: in that case it could take some time to reload until unity don't call it again...
[14:36] <didrocks> hey fginther, you are doing the other components now that bamf is fixed?
[14:36] <didrocks> fginther: basically the whole unity stack is now approved
[14:44] <fginther> didrocks, yes, I'm moving on to the other pieces now that bamf has landed
[14:44] <fginther> didrocks, I'm working from the list provided by mterry
[14:45] <didrocks> fginther: tell me once done, there is more that I approved (unity for instance + some other lenses)
[14:46] <fginther> didrocks, will do
[14:46] <didrocks> thanks :)
[14:59] <didrocks> bregma: hey! I think you saw my comments on https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/unity/lp1066788.cairo-text-stitching/+merge/131365 and https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/unity/lp893140.launcher-icon-feedback/+merge/131576
[15:00] <didrocks> bregma: can you please refresh your team on the fact that it's critical that every merge that needs testing now have automated tests and no more manual ones for the automated upload trend?
[15:00] <didrocks> bregma: btw, I have the list of all unity components if you are not subscribed to all MR yet ;)
[15:00] <bregma> I seem to be subscribed to more than I can keep up with
[15:02] <didrocks> bregma: that's a sign you are just subscribed to what you need :)
[15:02] <didrocks> bregma: and also that you need better email filtering server-side!
[15:03] <bregma> or your superhuman powers
[15:04] <didrocks> bregma: it's called "n" on google products or even on thunderbird! :p
[15:20] <dholbach> Trevinho, nothing in /var/crash
[15:47] <fginther> didrocks, Is there a need to retain the precise packages under unity-team/staging ppa? We hit a storage limit and removing the old packages is a quick fix.
[15:48] <didrocks> fginther: current precise package should go the unity-team/sru already, you can remove all old cruft I think
[15:48] <didrocks> to*
[15:48] <fginther> didrocks, that's what mmrazik and I thought. thanks
[15:49] <didrocks> yw ;)
[15:49] <didrocks> fginther: I think we should at some point just do a script to clean the ppa, like removing all unpublished (superseeded) packages for instance
[15:49] <didrocks> fginther: I'll need it anyway for the daily upload, will share it with you
[15:50] <fginther> didrocks, that would be excellent, thanks
[16:36] <fginther> didrocks, FYI: unity-team/staging is full due to an lp issue, so all dputs are failing. I'll continue landing the inline packaging changes, then dput them to the PPA when the storage issue is resolved.
[16:36] <didrocks> fginther: perfect, thanks for the notice :)
[17:01] <mterry> didrocks, what did you mean about 'make dist' in unity's merge: https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity/inline-debian/+merge/133121
[17:01] <didrocks> mterry: so, cmake doesn't have a "dist" support
[17:01] <didrocks> mterry: make dist in unity and compiz are handled manually
[17:02] <didrocks> it's basically "exporting everything that bzr versionned"
[17:02] <mterry> fginther, last modules to be added to the jenkins-fixup queue: unity, unity-lens-files, unity-lens-music, unity-lens-shopping, unity-lens-gdocs, and unity-scope-video-remote
[17:02] <didrocks> using bzr export
[17:02] <didrocks> mterry: you probably want to filter the debian/ dir
[17:02] <mterry> didrocks, ah...  hm
[17:02]  * didrocks sees --filters
[17:02] <didrocks> mterry: no hurry, you can do that in another MR
[17:08] <fginther> mterry, ack
[17:09] <mterry> fginther, thanks!
[17:23] <didrocks> fginther: in case you didn't see it: https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity-asset-pool/inline-debian/+merge/132981
[17:23] <didrocks> fginther: btw, I don't see the armfh failing, did you enable it?
[17:24] <mterry> didrocks, fginther: I assumed that failure was because the recipe didn't get fixed up?
[17:25] <didrocks> mterry: yeah, it's purely internal to the merge system
[17:25] <fginther> didrocks, are you referring to unity-asset-pool armhf?
[17:26] <fginther> didrocks, the general answer is that arm builds are still only enabled for a handful of branches until we can improve the throughput
[17:27] <didrocks> fginther: do you know when this will happen? it's a dependency to have automated daily upload of the stack
[17:27] <fginther> didrocks, let me discuss with Martin, I'll get back to you
[17:27] <didrocks> fginther: thanks ;)
[17:33] <fginther> mterry, nux/inline-debian failed during make check: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1340370/
[17:33] <fginther> mterry, is this a packaging issue?
[17:36] <mterry> fginther, possibly?   Let me play with that again.  I was able to build it locally as I recall
[17:37] <fginther> mterry, autolanding is done inside a pbuilder chroot if that helps you any
[17:39] <mterry> fginther, cool, that's what I use too
[17:40] <fginther> mterry, it also uses a hook script to trigger 'make check-headless' and 'make check' after the build
[17:41] <mterry> fginther, that's probably what I missed.  That should be part of the standard build, eh?
[17:42] <fginther> mterry, yes, that would be ideal
[17:50] <mterry> fginther, these hook scripts expect the packaging to install all the necessary packages for 'make check'?
[17:51] <mterry> fginther, I'm not seeing libgtest-dev in debian/control either, but it seems to be available during your make check-headless output...  so something is installing it
[18:01] <fginther> mterry, the hook scripts do install the following as a workaround for packages that don't automatically enable tests: libgtest-dev google-mock dbus-test-runner xvfb dbus-x11 at-spi2-core
[18:01] <mterry> fginther, yeah, I think you need to add a couple to the mix until we land in-package-testing branches
[18:01] <mterry> let me get the names
[18:02] <fginther> mterry, I can try that
[18:02] <mterry> fginther, libboost-filesystem1.49-dev and libboost-system1.49-dev
[18:02] <mterry> fginther, I think that's it?
[18:03] <fginther> mterry, I'll give it a try in a bit and get back to you
[18:04] <mterry> fginther, er and libboost-dev and libxtst-dev
[18:06] <didrocks> mterry: it was a hook installing it, but as we are going to run the check now during build (and everything should be in main), please add them :)
[18:06] <mterry> didrocks, did you mention there was a nice debhelper way to build with flavors?  (ala DEB_MAKE_FLAVORS)
[18:06] <didrocks> libboost-* are in universe though IIRC
[18:07] <mterry> didrocks, that's for a separate branch though.  Like I said in one of the merge requests, these packaging branches are hard to review (everything is marked as new changes), so I want to keep delta down to a minimum
[18:07] <didrocks> mterry: hum, not recently, at least, I remember to have read something on planet debian or ubuntu
[18:07] <mterry> didrocks, I'd be happy to propose new branches to enable tests
[18:07] <didrocks> mterry: yeah yeah, I'm fine with a separate branch :)
[18:08] <mterry> didrocks, hmm, good point about universe too.  that will need some mir work
[18:08] <didrocks> mterry: yeah, for only build-dep test, should be fine
[19:08] <fginther> mterry, FYI nux make check is passing now
[19:08] <mterry> fginther, awesome
[20:48] <mterry> fginther, is that nux jenkins failure a real one?
[20:48] <fginther> I just filed a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/1076129
[20:49] <fginther> mterry, it looks like enabling tests exposed a latent issue. I'm going to disable make check to land your branch, then enable it for future MPs
[20:50] <mterry> k
[22:36] <fginther> mterry, question regarding unity-lens-applications inline MP. Why was 6.0 series not used as the basis for the package version (MP is using 5.12.0)
[22:36] <mterry> fginther, probably a mistake on my part
[22:36] <mterry> fginther, I can redo tomorrow
[22:37] <mterry> thanks for the catch
[22:37] <fginther> I caught it after the merge :-(
[22:37] <mterry> oh
[22:38] <mterry> Well, I can update it tomorrow then  :)
[22:39] <fginther> that's fine. the only issue is that it's being rejected from the unity-team/staging ppa.
[22:39] <fginther> Which is not an issue at this time (the ppa still has a copy)
[22:40] <fginther> mterry, please also check that compiz has the right version. I saw a similar ppa rejection message there
[22:44] <mterry> fginther, hrm.  OK.