[02:44] <StevenK> BLEH
[02:45] <StevenK> I wanted buildbot done when I got back from lunch, but it failed PQM due to testfix
[02:45]  * StevenK stabs testfix
[02:46] <StevenK> wallyworld, wgrant: The Top 10 Durations make me very sad. Product, Bug, Bug, Bug, Bug, Bug, Bug, Bug, Distribution, Bug
[02:47] <wallyworld> there's more to do
[02:48] <StevenK> wallyworld: It's LP. There is *always* more to do.
[02:49] <wallyworld> yep
[08:48] <adeuring> good morning
[08:56] <dimitern> adeuring: morning :)
[09:01] <StevenK> adeuring: Could you please please get Aaron to do his QA today? It's been holding up deployments for two days.
[09:01] <adeuring> StevenK: sure
[11:02] <smartboyhw> Hi guys, is the on call reviewer rick_h here?
[11:04] <czajkowski> smartboyhw: nope he's stateside atm
[11:04] <czajkowski> think thats left over from yesterday
[11:04] <smartboyhw> czajkowski, ouch. Want to fix a small bug
[11:05] <smartboyhw> Very small, just a typo thing
[11:05] <czajkowski> adeuring: know who is the on call reviewer today ?
[11:06] <adeuring> czajkowski: nobody right now: https://dev.launchpad.net/ReviewerSchedule
[11:06] <czajkowski> adeuring: cheers
[11:06] <adeuring> smartboyhw: I am a reviewer too. what's up
[11:08] <smartboyhw> adeuring, bug 978002
[11:08] <_mup_> Bug #978002: Incorrect wording in 'Your Launchpad Karma'. <karma> <lp-answers> <trivial> <Launchpad itself:In Progress> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/978002 >
[11:08] <smartboyhw> very small one:P
[11:09] <czajkowski> adeuring: thanks
[11:11] <adeuring> smartboyhw: As Curtis noted in a bug comment, you patch unfortunately does not fix the problem in production
[11:11] <smartboyhw> oh?
[11:11] <adeuring> We need to manually run an SQL command on the production database
[11:11] <smartboyhw> adeuring, eh
[11:11]  * smartboyhw goes crying
[11:12] <smartboyhw> Let me go find another bug to fix then
[11:12] <adeuring> smartboyhw: sure, sounds good. if you have any qestion, feel free to ping me
[11:12] <StevenK> smartboyhw: I will mention that bug to Curtis when I speak to him, too, since he hasn't done it.
[11:12] <smartboyhw> adeuring, StevenK thanks
[11:51] <ev> Hiya. Would someone please create a project group for me: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/213666
[11:52] <czajkowski> ev: sure
[11:54] <ev> czajkowski: cheers
[11:54] <czajkowski> ev: can you pm me a project group summary and a description please.
[11:54] <rick_h> heh, sorry that was Tues
[11:55] <czajkowski> rick_h: morning
[11:55] <rick_h> morning czajkowski
[11:55] <czajkowski> rick_h: whats the state of the nation over there with the electricity
[11:55] <rick_h> czajkowski: came back in the afternoon and all the clocks reset and hopefully the UPS is charged back up
[11:55] <rick_h> kind of strange, we don't lose power much here
[11:55] <czajkowski> sweet
[11:55] <czajkowski> back home home it does reguarly
[11:56] <czajkowski> for hours, and nobody really does the back up generator
[11:56] <czajkowski> not sure why
[11:56] <czajkowski> remember one christmas it was gone for 6 days
[11:56] <czajkowski> pita
[11:56] <rick_h> ouch
[11:56] <rick_h> sucked just to lose it for half a day
[11:56] <rick_h> I think 6 days would kill off the fish
[11:56] <czajkowski> most of the country was hit that year.
[11:57] <dpm> hi Launchpad devs, what's the best way to reassign ownership of a branch in LP from an individual to a team?
[12:00] <bac> rick_h: why did the power go out?
[12:00] <rick_h> bac: no idea. The website showed it hit a couple sqmi but no reason I could find
[12:00] <rick_h> so guess something just went boom
[12:01] <czajkowski> ev: almost there
[12:01] <bac> rick_h: a friend of mine had a *huge* salt water aquarium with lots of exotics and coral.  lost power for 7 days and they were all dead.
[12:01] <czajkowski> just having issues with the name
[12:01] <czajkowski> :/
[12:01] <bac> he went out and bought a $10K generac as soon as possible
[12:01] <rick_h> bac: yea, I think this was our first outage of more than 10min in years so got me thinking about the squarium yesterday
[12:01] <czajkowski> dpm: hmmm
[12:01] <czajkowski> unsure
[12:01] <rick_h> freshwater though, so not that much $$ into it
[12:01] <czajkowski> rick_h: any ideas re dpm
[12:01] <rick_h> but still a couple grand
[12:02] <rick_h> czajkowski: dpm I'd just take the branch and push it to the team if you've got access.
[12:02] <rick_h> bzr push lp:~team/project/branch
[12:02] <dpm> ok, let me try that
[12:02] <dpm> thanks
[12:02] <rick_h> dpm: off the top of my head, errors may ensue :)
[12:02] <czajkowski> bah naturally the first time I go to create a project group it wont work smoothly
[12:03] <czajkowski> keep having an issue at Invalid name 'ubuntu error tracker'. Names must be at least two characters long and start with a letter or number. All letters must be lower-case. The characters +, - and . are also allowed after the first character.
[12:04] <czajkowski> but cant se any other project with the name so no idea why it's clashing :/
[12:05] <czajkowski> ev: I'm gonna wait till sinzui comes online to ask him but it'll be done in the next few hours.
[12:18] <dpm> rick_h, czajkowski, pushing the team branch and then setting the location in the project page worked, thanks!
[12:19] <rick_h> dpm: awesome, glad to hear it
[12:20] <czajkowski> dpm: lovely jubbly
[12:20] <czajkowski> now if all questions could be as simply solved today that would also be great
[12:20] <czajkowski> I know full well sinzui is gonna come along and say someting very simple as to why I cannot create this project group
[12:20] <czajkowski> but for the life of me I've no idea why :/
[12:35] <ev> czajkowski: thanks
[12:54] <czajkowski> Grabbing lunch bbiab
[13:57] <ev> thanks czajkowski, sinzui
[13:57] <czajkowski> sinzui: you did it ?
[13:58] <czajkowski> bah wanted to learn why it wasnt doing it for me :/
[13:58] <sinzui> the form requires a summary and description, and since none was provided in the question, I pasted the display name
[13:59] <sinzui> czajkowski, We don't uses title, but it too is required, so we paste that name in there
[13:59] <czajkowski> yes but I had that pasted in
[13:59] <czajkowski> I pasted the name in there also :/
[14:00] <sinzui> what error did you see? the form will usually state there is a form error?
[14:01] <sinzui> czajkowski, repeat what you did here: https://qastaging.launchpad.net/projectgroups/+new
[14:02] <czajkowski> ok
[14:03] <czajkowski> sinzui: same issue
[14:03] <czajkowski> Invalid name 'ubuntu error tracker staging'. Names must be at least two characters long and start with a letter or number. All letters must be lower-case. The characters +, - and . are also allowed after the first character.
[14:03] <czajkowski> A unique name, used in URLs, identifying the project group. All lowercase, no special characters. Examples: apache, mozilla, gimp.
[14:03] <czajkowski> wit the naming
[14:04] <sinzui> name is launchpad-id
[14:04] <sinzui> ubuntu-error-tracker
[14:04] <czajkowski> ahhhhh
[14:04] <czajkowski> https://qastaging.launchpad.net/launchpad-id
[14:04] <sinzui> ev, wrote the display name and launchpad-id in reverse of what Lp does
[14:05] <czajkowski> *headdes*
[14:05] <czajkowski> ok
[14:05] <czajkowski> will know for future
[14:05] <czajkowski> couldnt see what the issue was
[14:06] <czajkowski> sinzui: thanks for the help
[14:12] <deryck> Morning, all.
[14:51] <tim_> sinzui, any plans on folding blueprints into the new sharing stuff?
[14:52] <sinzui> tim_, deryck's squad have already done that
[14:53] <sinzui> tim_, the porject's +sharing page lets you set the blueprint sharing policy
[14:53] <tim_> sinzui, awesome
[14:53] <deryck> yup, just need to be in beta testers group.
[14:53] <tim_> I think I'm in that group
[14:54] <adeuring> jcsackett: could you please review this MP: https://code.launchpad.net/~adeuring/launchpad/product-lp-limitedview-2/+merge/133481 ?
[15:04] <rick_h> deryck: ping
[15:04] <deryck> rick_h, yo
[15:04] <rick_h> deryck: hey so wiring this into blueprints and noticing the fun part.
[15:05] <rick_h> so if the project is private we show the privacy banner
[15:05] <rick_h> and so when you go to create a new blueprint the privacy banner is already showing
[15:05] <jcsackett> adeuring: you got it.
[15:05] <rick_h> while the type shows public at the moment to start with
[15:05] <adeuring> jcsackett: thanks!
[15:05] <rick_h> have we talked about how we want banners to work in mixed cases?
[15:07] <deryck> rick_h, I think that's correct, right?  If you have a proprietary or embargoed project, the artifacts should be that by default anyway, which means we start with the banner.  right?
[15:08] <rick_h> right, maybe I've just got my self into a strange project setup state.
[15:09] <rick_h> ok, will double check the blueprints widget since it shold have defaulted to non-public since blueprints were configured in sharing to be proprietary only
[15:14] <deryck> rick_h, we may not be consistent in this yet, see bug 1076412 that I just filed.  But what you described sounds like what we expect.
[15:14] <_mup_> Bug #1076412: Proprietary projects should only allow proprietary policies on its artifacts <private-projects> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1076412 >
[15:14] <rick_h> deryck: yea, I see what I did. I have a prop project and I setup in sharing to have blueprints that were public, but could be prop.
[15:14] <rick_h> deryck: so I just got thrown off when I saw the privacy banner, but the information type widget was defaulting to public
[15:45] <jcsackett> adeuring: r=me.
[15:52] <czajkowski> cjwatson: ello any idea when Bug 1071562  might get a look at ?
[15:52] <_mup_> Bug #1071562: UEFI signing failures cause binaries to be republished continuously <oops> <regression> <soyuz-publish> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1071562 >
[15:57] <adeuring> jcsackett: thanks!
[15:57] <cjwatson> czajkowski: yeah, sorry - I plan to get to it tomorrow
[15:58] <czajkowski> cjwatson: excellent thanks colin
[16:01] <deryck> adeuring, I added a hangout to the calendar event for our call.
[16:01] <adeuring> deryck: coming...
[16:13] <benji> bac: sure; when will my new one be?
[16:13] <benji> pfft
[17:04] <jcsackett> sinzui (or anyone else) any idea where bzr branches go when pushed to lp://dev on the local filesystem?
[17:05] <jcsackett> abentley, you might know? ^
[17:53] <abentley> jcsackett: I think it's /var/tmp/bazaar.launchpad.dev/mirrors
[17:54] <abentley> jcsackett: it will be in a numbered subdirectory in there.
[17:55] <jcsackett> abentley: hrm. i looked there earlier i thought.
[17:55] <jcsackett> oh! i didn't check dotfiles.
[17:55] <jcsackett> just checked those in the cache...
[17:56] <abentley> jcsackett: The numbered subdirectories are derived from the hex representation of the branch db id.
[17:56] <jcsackett> abentley: ah, dig. thank you. :-)
[17:56] <abentley> jcsackett: np.
[18:01] <jcsackett> sinzui: i am running to my appt. shall i set you as OCR in the title?
[18:02] <jcsackett> sinzui: i'll review your branch as soon as i can.
[21:22] <jcsackett> sinzui: i am looking at your branch. i am a little confused about what's going on in line 62 of your diff.
[21:23]  * sinzui looks
[21:23] <jcsackett> sinzui: it looks like you call get_msg_ids_to_remove, which calls _get_msg_ids...; but then you call _get_msg_ids again on the return?
[21:24] <sinzui> Yes, by passing a subset of ids, the method will filter out those that became used inbetween transaction calls
[21:25] <sinzui> The list of ids is cached and it contains duplicates
[21:25] <jcsackett> ah, ok.
[21:25] <jcsackett> just making sure i was reading things right.
[21:25] <sinzui> Since the cache is can be invalid the moment we call commit() at the end of the loop, we need to ensure we still only have unused potmsgset ids
[21:26] <jcsackett> dig. r=me, sinzui.
[21:26] <sinzui> thank you
[21:37] <sinzui> jcsackett, do you have a few minutes to talk about this http://paste.ubuntu.com/1343678/
[21:37] <sinzui> its in regards to bug 872335
[21:37] <_mup_> Bug #872335: TypeError raised by rosetta-poimport.py script <lp-translations> <oops> <rosetta-imports> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/872335 >
[21:38] <czajkowski> sinzui: is it possible to have private project groups, never heard f them but am getting all sorts of unusal requests today
[21:38] <sinzui> no, we have no plans to make them since project groups are broken by design
[21:39] <czajkowski> nods
[21:39] <czajkowski> grand
[21:39] <sinzui> They don't work for organizations or communities
[21:39] <sinzui> We would remove them if we had time
[21:40] <czajkowski> sinzui: that might upset a lot of people
[21:40] <sinzui> They are upset now that they don't work
[21:41] <sinzui> Organisations cannot trust them since anyone can place their project into your group, and since s project cannot be in more than one group, communities cannot share and plane.
[21:42] <czajkowski> nods
[21:42] <czajkowski> logically it makes sense
[21:46] <lifeless> flacoste: o/
[22:13] <sinzui> StevenK, jcsackett: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1343678/
[22:27] <StevenK> sinzui: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1343825/