/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/11/08/#launchpad.txt

=== Logan_ is now known as Guest30878
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_
sakhm2does anyone know if canonical provides a commercial option for launchpad to increase the build score for PPAs?07:33
=== mrevell_ is now known as mrevell
czajkowskisakhm2: commercial subscriptions do get a slighty higher build score yes09:23
TheLordOfTimedo the PPAs support Raring yet?09:27
yofel__TheLordOfTime: they do09:37
apacheloggerahoy, if someone could process https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/213663 I'd be a very happy user :)10:29
czajkowskiapachelogger: it does come into my queue10:41
czajkowskibut will look now10:41
czajkowskiapachelogger: done10:42
apacheloggerczajkowski: thank you :)10:43
czajkowskinp10:43
=== dimitern is now known as dimitern_lunch
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinhal is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== dimitern_lunch is now known as dimitern
=== mpt_ is now known as mpt
hrwhi14:18
hrwis it possible to make ARM only PPA? I have some packages for Chromebook and want to build/publish/test them before pushing them to Debian/Ubuntu archives.14:19
czajkowskihrw: you're linaro/canonical?14:24
hrwczajkowski: both14:24
czajkowskihrw: what ppa specifically ?14:25
hrwhttps://launchpad.net/~hrw/+archive/my-own-packages14:26
czajkowskiwebops can you please look after hrw request14:26
hrwso basically arm builders are company only so far?14:26
czajkowskiyes14:27
hrwthx14:27
geserhrw: AFAIK it's because of missing virtualization on ARM so only trusted people get access to them14:27
geserhrw: does LP support building arch:all packages without an i386 builder?14:28
czajkowskignuoy: you about?14:28
hrwgeser: right. I used wrong wording14:28
gnuoyczajkowski, I am14:29
czajkowskignuoy: could you look after hrw request re arm please14:30
gnuoyczajkowski, hrw, I don't know of a way of excluding non-arm builds but I can enable arm on that ppa14:31
hrwgnuoy: x86+arm is ok  ;)14:31
czajkowskignuoy: lovely thanks14:31
gnuoyhrw, done14:32
hrwcool, thanks14:32
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
dobeygeser: not yet; arch:all still only gets built on i386, as do source package builds for recipes iirc15:05
dholbachhiya15:59
dholbachcan somebody help me renaming https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-adt to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-adk - I was in a hurry when I created it :)15:59
dholbachor shall I file a ticket?16:00
dholbachczajkowski, ^ :)16:00
czajkowskisure16:02
czajkowskidone16:02
czajkowski:)16:02
czajkowskidholbach: ^16:02
dholbachholy cow16:02
dholbachthat was quick16:02
* dholbach hugs czajkowski16:02
dholbach← happy16:02
TheLordOfTimeczajkowski > time.normalspeed :P16:02
czajkowskiyeah we dont leave people waiting you know :)16:02
TheLordOfTimejust saying :P16:02
czajkowskion the ball :)16:03
TheLordOfTimeyep.16:03
czajkowskidholbach: lets be honest you're always happy! :)16:03
TheLordOfTimeczajkowski, out of curiosity, any idea why i386 builders for PPAs have a smaller queue / less-time-to-build compared to AMD64?16:03
czajkowskibah16:03
czajkowskisee you had to ask a question I couldnt just answer16:04
* TheLordOfTime is evil/epic that way16:04
TheLordOfTimebut seriously, its a question i want answered :P16:04
dholbachczajkowski, I'll leave you in that belief :)16:04
dobeyTheLordOfTime: random chance :)16:05
TheLordOfTimedobey, https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965896  <-- 5 minutes, vs.  https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965896  <-- 4 hours ?16:05
TheLordOfTimeseems oddly consistently disparate16:05
dobeyoh, some build broke the privace of /builders again16:05
dobeyTheLordOfTime: those are the same link16:05
TheLordOfTimeoops16:06
TheLordOfTimecopy-past eissue16:06
TheLordOfTimeone moment16:06
TheLordOfTimehttps://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965895  <-- that's the 4 hours one16:06
TheLordOfTimesame package upload though :p16:06
czajkowskidobey: you cant see it ?16:06
dobeyalso, how'd you get '5 minutes' on i386 just now?16:06
TheLordOfTimedobey, this was uploaded several hours ago16:06
dobeyczajkowski: nope, it showss the Forbidden page16:06
czajkowskiahh16:07
TheLordOfTimedobey, note the "created X hours ago" at the top of said pagesw16:07
czajkowskiI need a banner that says you have magical LP powers and can see stuff when others cant16:07
dobeyTheLordOfTime: oh; because i just submitted a couple of builds that said 4 or 5 hours, on i38616:07
TheLordOfTimedobey, about 7 hours ago i uploaded the package.  the i386 says "5 minutes"16:07
TheLordOfTimedobey, consistently with 25 other PPA uploads in the past, oh, many months, i386 has had far faster time-to-build-start times than amd6416:07
TheLordOfTimesometimes with amd64 taking >8 hours longer to get to start building16:08
TheLordOfTimeso its a valid question: is that by-design, or is it something buggy16:08
czajkowskiTheLordOfTime: I suspect only webops folks would be able to answer that16:09
czajkowskinot lpadders16:09
TheLordOfTimeczajkowski, any idea where i can poke them>?16:09
TheLordOfTimeeither that, or i'll just file a question about it :P16:09
czajkowskiI've just done that16:09
TheLordOfTimeczajkowski, awesome.16:09
TheLordOfTimethanks.16:09
dobeyTheLordOfTime: it's not by design; it is more likely simply random chance; note also they are estimates, and there could be something building that is taking overly long to build or such16:09
* TheLordOfTime initiates lurkmode while he runs to grab some coffee16:09
TheLordOfTimedobey, the estimates've been consistently disparate even when they get moved around.16:10
dobeythere have been things in the past which have taken >24 hours building; which can screw with build times16:10
TheLordOfTimei386 time-to-build-start is always less than amd64 time-to-build-start.16:10
TheLordOfTimedobey, i expect that on the builders for release, not PPAs :/16:10
dobeyTheLordOfTime: right, but usually they start at the same time for me16:10
TheLordOfTimes/I expect/I'd expect/16:10
dobeyTheLordOfTime: also, some amd64 packages may have to wait for certain i386 builds to finish first, when arch:all deps are involved i guess16:11
czajkowskiTheLordOfTime: it really does just vary tbh16:12
czajkowskiand dont forget other things that have a higher score do pop in from time to time also16:12
TheLordOfTime<TheLordOfTime> dobey, the estimates've been consistently disparate even when they get moved around.  <-- that included that chance.16:12
TheLordOfTimeanyways, coffee run.16:12
smoserit seems that pad.lv is bustd?16:22
smoserexample: http://pad.lv/97812716:22
ubot5Launchpad bug 978127 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Precise) "incorrect time on node causes failed oauth" [High,Triaged]16:22
czajkowskinever heard of pad.lv16:22
czajkowskismoser: trying to find out now16:29
* smoser loves pad.lv (http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/pad-lv)16:33
czajkowskismoser: funky 9 months in and learn something new16:34
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch]
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara
jonrafkindwhat is the status of 1071562?18:16
dobeybug #1071562 ?18:16
ubot5Launchpad bug 1071562 in Launchpad itself "UEFI signing failures cause binaries to be republished continuously" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/107156218:16
jonrafkindyes18:17
jonrafkindi meant is anyone working on it?18:27
sinzuijonrafkind, We expect it to be fixed next week18:29
jonrafkindok18:29
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck
dobeyugh. /builders is still 'Forbidden'19:25
yofel_make that 'again', it was accessible again a while ago :/19:28
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
xnoxhttps://launchpad.net/builders is having that thing again20:10
xnoxwhere it's "Not allowed here"20:10
xnoxinstead of showing status / summary20:10
xnoxI remember it did that once before sometime in precise cycle.20:11
xnoxczajkowski, remember that one time?20:11
czajkowskidobey: xnox stuff on there being built that is private it doesnt know how to only show stuff that is able to be displayed so it shows it all hidden20:22
dobeyczajkowski: there was a bug previously that was fixed; but it appears it's been reintroduced20:23
xnoxdobey: exatcly.20:23
dobeyczajkowski: for a while, it was showing 'Private build' on builders that were doing such; but now it seems it's broken again20:23
czajkowskidobey: this is what sinzui tells me20:23
xnoxsince it's only suppose to show "building private built"20:23
sinzuiThis is was never fixed and engineers ague over how to handle builds that involve private teams or P3As The page becomes unavailable while the edge cases are building20:28
sinzuiThe odd think about this build is that I can see it. This is the first time since I don't have special build privs. I think this means I am in the team or subscribed to the p3a that is building20:30
dobeysinzui: i'm pretty sure i remember wgrant or someone talking about a fix getting deployed for this the last time there was a bunch of noise about it in here. and i quite definitely know i have seen "Private build" listed for some builders on that page when private builds were happening, after that point in time, and before now.22:05
wgrantIt's the old case of the copy from a public PPA into a private PPA owned by a private team that you're not authorised to see.22:06
sinzuiWe need inline redacting for this case I think22:06
wgrantCertainly22:06
wgrantIt should say "Private build" like other private builds22:06
wgrantIt just doesn't, yet :)22:06
dobeywgrant: are those copies what's been killing build queue times today as well?22:33
wgrantdobey: No22:43
wgrantThat's just lots of people uploading stuff :/22:44
mwhudsonalways a problem when people use your system for its intended purpose :)22:46
dobeywgrant: lots of Canonical/Linaro people uploading long build packages or something? even my uploads with the tweaked build scores have had extremely long wait times today :-/22:48
czajkowskithis is the problem then when people come looking for build bumps22:50
czajkowskipushes other peoples down on the queue :/22:50
wgrantYeah22:55
wgrantEveryone says their packages are important, so everyone ends up waiting anyway :)22:55
dobeywell, i'm only hitting this issue really because LP defaults to 'rebuild the binaries' for copying packages across PPAs; and i didn't notice until after i'd already copied that it did that. :-/22:59
dobeyand i can't delete the packages and just copy the binaries over22:59
dobeythat really should default to 'copy existing binaries'23:00
dobeyanyway, i have to go now. later :)23:01
czajkowskilifeless: pugtastic!23:17
lifelessczajkowski: its pretty cool :)23:25
czajkowskiit is23:25
czajkowskiI do love pugs!23:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!