=== Logan_ is now known as Guest30878 | ||
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
sakhm2 | does anyone know if canonical provides a commercial option for launchpad to increase the build score for PPAs? | 07:33 |
---|---|---|
=== mrevell_ is now known as mrevell | ||
czajkowski | sakhm2: commercial subscriptions do get a slighty higher build score yes | 09:23 |
TheLordOfTime | do the PPAs support Raring yet? | 09:27 |
yofel__ | TheLordOfTime: they do | 09:37 |
apachelogger | ahoy, if someone could process https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/213663 I'd be a very happy user :) | 10:29 |
czajkowski | apachelogger: it does come into my queue | 10:41 |
czajkowski | but will look now | 10:41 |
czajkowski | apachelogger: done | 10:42 |
apachelogger | czajkowski: thank you :) | 10:43 |
czajkowski | np | 10:43 |
=== dimitern is now known as dimitern_lunch | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinhal is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== dimitern_lunch is now known as dimitern | ||
=== mpt_ is now known as mpt | ||
hrw | hi | 14:18 |
hrw | is it possible to make ARM only PPA? I have some packages for Chromebook and want to build/publish/test them before pushing them to Debian/Ubuntu archives. | 14:19 |
czajkowski | hrw: you're linaro/canonical? | 14:24 |
hrw | czajkowski: both | 14:24 |
czajkowski | hrw: what ppa specifically ? | 14:25 |
hrw | https://launchpad.net/~hrw/+archive/my-own-packages | 14:26 |
czajkowski | webops can you please look after hrw request | 14:26 |
hrw | so basically arm builders are company only so far? | 14:26 |
czajkowski | yes | 14:27 |
hrw | thx | 14:27 |
geser | hrw: AFAIK it's because of missing virtualization on ARM so only trusted people get access to them | 14:27 |
geser | hrw: does LP support building arch:all packages without an i386 builder? | 14:28 |
czajkowski | gnuoy: you about? | 14:28 |
hrw | geser: right. I used wrong wording | 14:28 |
gnuoy | czajkowski, I am | 14:29 |
czajkowski | gnuoy: could you look after hrw request re arm please | 14:30 |
gnuoy | czajkowski, hrw, I don't know of a way of excluding non-arm builds but I can enable arm on that ppa | 14:31 |
hrw | gnuoy: x86+arm is ok ;) | 14:31 |
czajkowski | gnuoy: lovely thanks | 14:31 |
gnuoy | hrw, done | 14:32 |
hrw | cool, thanks | 14:32 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
dobey | geser: not yet; arch:all still only gets built on i386, as do source package builds for recipes iirc | 15:05 |
dholbach | hiya | 15:59 |
dholbach | can somebody help me renaming https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-adt to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-adk - I was in a hurry when I created it :) | 15:59 |
dholbach | or shall I file a ticket? | 16:00 |
dholbach | czajkowski, ^ :) | 16:00 |
czajkowski | sure | 16:02 |
czajkowski | done | 16:02 |
czajkowski | :) | 16:02 |
czajkowski | dholbach: ^ | 16:02 |
dholbach | holy cow | 16:02 |
dholbach | that was quick | 16:02 |
* dholbach hugs czajkowski | 16:02 | |
dholbach | ← happy | 16:02 |
TheLordOfTime | czajkowski > time.normalspeed :P | 16:02 |
czajkowski | yeah we dont leave people waiting you know :) | 16:02 |
TheLordOfTime | just saying :P | 16:02 |
czajkowski | on the ball :) | 16:03 |
TheLordOfTime | yep. | 16:03 |
czajkowski | dholbach: lets be honest you're always happy! :) | 16:03 |
TheLordOfTime | czajkowski, out of curiosity, any idea why i386 builders for PPAs have a smaller queue / less-time-to-build compared to AMD64? | 16:03 |
czajkowski | bah | 16:03 |
czajkowski | see you had to ask a question I couldnt just answer | 16:04 |
* TheLordOfTime is evil/epic that way | 16:04 | |
TheLordOfTime | but seriously, its a question i want answered :P | 16:04 |
dholbach | czajkowski, I'll leave you in that belief :) | 16:04 |
dobey | TheLordOfTime: random chance :) | 16:05 |
TheLordOfTime | dobey, https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965896 <-- 5 minutes, vs. https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965896 <-- 4 hours ? | 16:05 |
TheLordOfTime | seems oddly consistently disparate | 16:05 |
dobey | oh, some build broke the privace of /builders again | 16:05 |
dobey | TheLordOfTime: those are the same link | 16:05 |
TheLordOfTime | oops | 16:06 |
TheLordOfTime | copy-past eissue | 16:06 |
TheLordOfTime | one moment | 16:06 |
TheLordOfTime | https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965895 <-- that's the 4 hours one | 16:06 |
TheLordOfTime | same package upload though :p | 16:06 |
czajkowski | dobey: you cant see it ? | 16:06 |
dobey | also, how'd you get '5 minutes' on i386 just now? | 16:06 |
TheLordOfTime | dobey, this was uploaded several hours ago | 16:06 |
dobey | czajkowski: nope, it showss the Forbidden page | 16:06 |
czajkowski | ahh | 16:07 |
TheLordOfTime | dobey, note the "created X hours ago" at the top of said pagesw | 16:07 |
czajkowski | I need a banner that says you have magical LP powers and can see stuff when others cant | 16:07 |
dobey | TheLordOfTime: oh; because i just submitted a couple of builds that said 4 or 5 hours, on i386 | 16:07 |
TheLordOfTime | dobey, about 7 hours ago i uploaded the package. the i386 says "5 minutes" | 16:07 |
TheLordOfTime | dobey, consistently with 25 other PPA uploads in the past, oh, many months, i386 has had far faster time-to-build-start times than amd64 | 16:07 |
TheLordOfTime | sometimes with amd64 taking >8 hours longer to get to start building | 16:08 |
TheLordOfTime | so its a valid question: is that by-design, or is it something buggy | 16:08 |
czajkowski | TheLordOfTime: I suspect only webops folks would be able to answer that | 16:09 |
czajkowski | not lpadders | 16:09 |
TheLordOfTime | czajkowski, any idea where i can poke them>? | 16:09 |
TheLordOfTime | either that, or i'll just file a question about it :P | 16:09 |
czajkowski | I've just done that | 16:09 |
TheLordOfTime | czajkowski, awesome. | 16:09 |
TheLordOfTime | thanks. | 16:09 |
dobey | TheLordOfTime: it's not by design; it is more likely simply random chance; note also they are estimates, and there could be something building that is taking overly long to build or such | 16:09 |
* TheLordOfTime initiates lurkmode while he runs to grab some coffee | 16:09 | |
TheLordOfTime | dobey, the estimates've been consistently disparate even when they get moved around. | 16:10 |
dobey | there have been things in the past which have taken >24 hours building; which can screw with build times | 16:10 |
TheLordOfTime | i386 time-to-build-start is always less than amd64 time-to-build-start. | 16:10 |
TheLordOfTime | dobey, i expect that on the builders for release, not PPAs :/ | 16:10 |
dobey | TheLordOfTime: right, but usually they start at the same time for me | 16:10 |
TheLordOfTime | s/I expect/I'd expect/ | 16:10 |
dobey | TheLordOfTime: also, some amd64 packages may have to wait for certain i386 builds to finish first, when arch:all deps are involved i guess | 16:11 |
czajkowski | TheLordOfTime: it really does just vary tbh | 16:12 |
czajkowski | and dont forget other things that have a higher score do pop in from time to time also | 16:12 |
TheLordOfTime | <TheLordOfTime> dobey, the estimates've been consistently disparate even when they get moved around. <-- that included that chance. | 16:12 |
TheLordOfTime | anyways, coffee run. | 16:12 |
smoser | it seems that pad.lv is bustd? | 16:22 |
smoser | example: http://pad.lv/978127 | 16:22 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 978127 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Precise) "incorrect time on node causes failed oauth" [High,Triaged] | 16:22 |
czajkowski | never heard of pad.lv | 16:22 |
czajkowski | smoser: trying to find out now | 16:29 |
* smoser loves pad.lv (http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/pad-lv) | 16:33 | |
czajkowski | smoser: funky 9 months in and learn something new | 16:34 |
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
jonrafkind | what is the status of 1071562? | 18:16 |
dobey | bug #1071562 ? | 18:16 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1071562 in Launchpad itself "UEFI signing failures cause binaries to be republished continuously" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1071562 | 18:16 |
jonrafkind | yes | 18:17 |
jonrafkind | i meant is anyone working on it? | 18:27 |
sinzui | jonrafkind, We expect it to be fixed next week | 18:29 |
jonrafkind | ok | 18:29 |
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
dobey | ugh. /builders is still 'Forbidden' | 19:25 |
yofel_ | make that 'again', it was accessible again a while ago :/ | 19:28 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
xnox | https://launchpad.net/builders is having that thing again | 20:10 |
xnox | where it's "Not allowed here" | 20:10 |
xnox | instead of showing status / summary | 20:10 |
xnox | I remember it did that once before sometime in precise cycle. | 20:11 |
xnox | czajkowski, remember that one time? | 20:11 |
czajkowski | dobey: xnox stuff on there being built that is private it doesnt know how to only show stuff that is able to be displayed so it shows it all hidden | 20:22 |
dobey | czajkowski: there was a bug previously that was fixed; but it appears it's been reintroduced | 20:23 |
xnox | dobey: exatcly. | 20:23 |
dobey | czajkowski: for a while, it was showing 'Private build' on builders that were doing such; but now it seems it's broken again | 20:23 |
czajkowski | dobey: this is what sinzui tells me | 20:23 |
xnox | since it's only suppose to show "building private built" | 20:23 |
sinzui | This is was never fixed and engineers ague over how to handle builds that involve private teams or P3As The page becomes unavailable while the edge cases are building | 20:28 |
sinzui | The odd think about this build is that I can see it. This is the first time since I don't have special build privs. I think this means I am in the team or subscribed to the p3a that is building | 20:30 |
dobey | sinzui: i'm pretty sure i remember wgrant or someone talking about a fix getting deployed for this the last time there was a bunch of noise about it in here. and i quite definitely know i have seen "Private build" listed for some builders on that page when private builds were happening, after that point in time, and before now. | 22:05 |
wgrant | It's the old case of the copy from a public PPA into a private PPA owned by a private team that you're not authorised to see. | 22:06 |
sinzui | We need inline redacting for this case I think | 22:06 |
wgrant | Certainly | 22:06 |
wgrant | It should say "Private build" like other private builds | 22:06 |
wgrant | It just doesn't, yet :) | 22:06 |
dobey | wgrant: are those copies what's been killing build queue times today as well? | 22:33 |
wgrant | dobey: No | 22:43 |
wgrant | That's just lots of people uploading stuff :/ | 22:44 |
mwhudson | always a problem when people use your system for its intended purpose :) | 22:46 |
dobey | wgrant: lots of Canonical/Linaro people uploading long build packages or something? even my uploads with the tweaked build scores have had extremely long wait times today :-/ | 22:48 |
czajkowski | this is the problem then when people come looking for build bumps | 22:50 |
czajkowski | pushes other peoples down on the queue :/ | 22:50 |
wgrant | Yeah | 22:55 |
wgrant | Everyone says their packages are important, so everyone ends up waiting anyway :) | 22:55 |
dobey | well, i'm only hitting this issue really because LP defaults to 'rebuild the binaries' for copying packages across PPAs; and i didn't notice until after i'd already copied that it did that. :-/ | 22:59 |
dobey | and i can't delete the packages and just copy the binaries over | 22:59 |
dobey | that really should default to 'copy existing binaries' | 23:00 |
dobey | anyway, i have to go now. later :) | 23:01 |
czajkowski | lifeless: pugtastic! | 23:17 |
lifeless | czajkowski: its pretty cool :) | 23:25 |
czajkowski | it is | 23:25 |
czajkowski | I do love pugs! | 23:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!