=== Logan_ is now known as Guest30878 === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ [07:33] does anyone know if canonical provides a commercial option for launchpad to increase the build score for PPAs? === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell [09:23] sakhm2: commercial subscriptions do get a slighty higher build score yes [09:27] do the PPAs support Raring yet? [09:37] TheLordOfTime: they do [10:29] ahoy, if someone could process https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/213663 I'd be a very happy user :) [10:41] apachelogger: it does come into my queue [10:41] but will look now [10:42] apachelogger: done [10:43] czajkowski: thank you :) [10:43] np === dimitern is now known as dimitern_lunch === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinhal is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === dimitern_lunch is now known as dimitern === mpt_ is now known as mpt [14:18] hi [14:19] is it possible to make ARM only PPA? I have some packages for Chromebook and want to build/publish/test them before pushing them to Debian/Ubuntu archives. [14:24] hrw: you're linaro/canonical? [14:24] czajkowski: both [14:25] hrw: what ppa specifically ? [14:26] https://launchpad.net/~hrw/+archive/my-own-packages [14:26] webops can you please look after hrw request [14:26] so basically arm builders are company only so far? [14:27] yes [14:27] thx [14:27] hrw: AFAIK it's because of missing virtualization on ARM so only trusted people get access to them [14:28] hrw: does LP support building arch:all packages without an i386 builder? [14:28] gnuoy: you about? [14:28] geser: right. I used wrong wording [14:29] czajkowski, I am [14:30] gnuoy: could you look after hrw request re arm please [14:31] czajkowski, hrw, I don't know of a way of excluding non-arm builds but I can enable arm on that ppa [14:31] gnuoy: x86+arm is ok ;) [14:31] gnuoy: lovely thanks [14:32] hrw, done [14:32] cool, thanks === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [15:05] geser: not yet; arch:all still only gets built on i386, as do source package builds for recipes iirc [15:59] hiya [15:59] can somebody help me renaming https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-adt to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-adk - I was in a hurry when I created it :) [16:00] or shall I file a ticket? [16:00] czajkowski, ^ :) [16:02] sure [16:02] done [16:02] :) [16:02] dholbach: ^ [16:02] holy cow [16:02] that was quick [16:02] * dholbach hugs czajkowski [16:02] ← happy [16:02] czajkowski > time.normalspeed :P [16:02] yeah we dont leave people waiting you know :) [16:02] just saying :P [16:03] on the ball :) [16:03] yep. [16:03] dholbach: lets be honest you're always happy! :) [16:03] czajkowski, out of curiosity, any idea why i386 builders for PPAs have a smaller queue / less-time-to-build compared to AMD64? [16:03] bah [16:04] see you had to ask a question I couldnt just answer [16:04] * TheLordOfTime is evil/epic that way [16:04] but seriously, its a question i want answered :P [16:04] czajkowski, I'll leave you in that belief :) [16:05] TheLordOfTime: random chance :) [16:05] dobey, https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965896 <-- 5 minutes, vs. https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965896 <-- 4 hours ? [16:05] seems oddly consistently disparate [16:05] oh, some build broke the privace of /builders again [16:05] TheLordOfTime: those are the same link [16:06] oops [16:06] copy-past eissue [16:06] one moment [16:06] https://launchpad.net/~format-junkie-team/+archive/release/+build/3965895 <-- that's the 4 hours one [16:06] same package upload though :p [16:06] dobey: you cant see it ? [16:06] also, how'd you get '5 minutes' on i386 just now? [16:06] dobey, this was uploaded several hours ago [16:06] czajkowski: nope, it showss the Forbidden page [16:07] ahh [16:07] dobey, note the "created X hours ago" at the top of said pagesw [16:07] I need a banner that says you have magical LP powers and can see stuff when others cant [16:07] TheLordOfTime: oh; because i just submitted a couple of builds that said 4 or 5 hours, on i386 [16:07] dobey, about 7 hours ago i uploaded the package. the i386 says "5 minutes" [16:07] dobey, consistently with 25 other PPA uploads in the past, oh, many months, i386 has had far faster time-to-build-start times than amd64 [16:08] sometimes with amd64 taking >8 hours longer to get to start building [16:08] so its a valid question: is that by-design, or is it something buggy [16:09] TheLordOfTime: I suspect only webops folks would be able to answer that [16:09] not lpadders [16:09] czajkowski, any idea where i can poke them>? [16:09] either that, or i'll just file a question about it :P [16:09] I've just done that [16:09] czajkowski, awesome. [16:09] thanks. [16:09] TheLordOfTime: it's not by design; it is more likely simply random chance; note also they are estimates, and there could be something building that is taking overly long to build or such [16:09] * TheLordOfTime initiates lurkmode while he runs to grab some coffee [16:10] dobey, the estimates've been consistently disparate even when they get moved around. [16:10] there have been things in the past which have taken >24 hours building; which can screw with build times [16:10] i386 time-to-build-start is always less than amd64 time-to-build-start. [16:10] dobey, i expect that on the builders for release, not PPAs :/ [16:10] TheLordOfTime: right, but usually they start at the same time for me [16:10] s/I expect/I'd expect/ [16:11] TheLordOfTime: also, some amd64 packages may have to wait for certain i386 builds to finish first, when arch:all deps are involved i guess [16:12] TheLordOfTime: it really does just vary tbh [16:12] and dont forget other things that have a higher score do pop in from time to time also [16:12] <TheLordOfTime> dobey, the estimates've been consistently disparate even when they get moved around. <-- that included that chance. [16:12] anyways, coffee run. [16:22] it seems that pad.lv is bustd? [16:22] example: http://pad.lv/978127 [16:22] Launchpad bug 978127 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Precise) "incorrect time on node causes failed oauth" [High,Triaged] [16:22] never heard of pad.lv [16:29] smoser: trying to find out now [16:33] * smoser loves pad.lv (http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/pad-lv) [16:34] smoser: funky 9 months in and learn something new === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:16] what is the status of 1071562? [18:16] bug #1071562 ? [18:16] Launchpad bug 1071562 in Launchpad itself "UEFI signing failures cause binaries to be republished continuously" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1071562 [18:17] yes [18:27] i meant is anyone working on it? [18:29] jonrafkind, We expect it to be fixed next week [18:29] ok === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck [19:25] ugh. /builders is still 'Forbidden' [19:28] make that 'again', it was accessible again a while ago :/ === yofel_ is now known as yofel [20:10] https://launchpad.net/builders is having that thing again [20:10] where it's "Not allowed here" [20:10] instead of showing status / summary [20:11] I remember it did that once before sometime in precise cycle. [20:11] czajkowski, remember that one time? [20:22] dobey: xnox stuff on there being built that is private it doesnt know how to only show stuff that is able to be displayed so it shows it all hidden [20:23] czajkowski: there was a bug previously that was fixed; but it appears it's been reintroduced [20:23] dobey: exatcly. [20:23] czajkowski: for a while, it was showing 'Private build' on builders that were doing such; but now it seems it's broken again [20:23] dobey: this is what sinzui tells me [20:23] since it's only suppose to show "building private built" [20:28] This is was never fixed and engineers ague over how to handle builds that involve private teams or P3As The page becomes unavailable while the edge cases are building [20:30] The odd think about this build is that I can see it. This is the first time since I don't have special build privs. I think this means I am in the team or subscribed to the p3a that is building [22:05] sinzui: i'm pretty sure i remember wgrant or someone talking about a fix getting deployed for this the last time there was a bunch of noise about it in here. and i quite definitely know i have seen "Private build" listed for some builders on that page when private builds were happening, after that point in time, and before now. [22:06] It's the old case of the copy from a public PPA into a private PPA owned by a private team that you're not authorised to see. [22:06] We need inline redacting for this case I think [22:06] Certainly [22:06] It should say "Private build" like other private builds [22:06] It just doesn't, yet :) [22:33] wgrant: are those copies what's been killing build queue times today as well? [22:43] dobey: No [22:44] That's just lots of people uploading stuff :/ [22:46] always a problem when people use your system for its intended purpose :) [22:48] wgrant: lots of Canonical/Linaro people uploading long build packages or something? even my uploads with the tweaked build scores have had extremely long wait times today :-/ [22:50] this is the problem then when people come looking for build bumps [22:50] pushes other peoples down on the queue :/ [22:55] Yeah [22:55] Everyone says their packages are important, so everyone ends up waiting anyway :) [22:59] well, i'm only hitting this issue really because LP defaults to 'rebuild the binaries' for copying packages across PPAs; and i didn't notice until after i'd already copied that it did that. :-/ [22:59] and i can't delete the packages and just copy the binaries over [23:00] that really should default to 'copy existing binaries' [23:01] anyway, i have to go now. later :) [23:17] lifeless: pugtastic! [23:25] czajkowski: its pretty cool :) [23:25] it is [23:25] I do love pugs!