bkerensa | slangasek: I <3 http://lintian.debian.org/ best thing since Ubuntu Harvest | 00:09 |
---|---|---|
bkerensa | ;p | 00:09 |
slangasek | is it? :) | 00:20 |
slangasek | I guess it's a good source of information about issues that maintainers will likely accept patches for | 00:20 |
slangasek | Unable to connect to mirrors.cat.pdx.edu:http: [IP: 131.252.208.27 80] | 00:33 |
slangasek | shaaaame | 00:33 |
bkerensa | slangasek: I like it and have as a result got some new contributions into Debian.... On another note do you know much about submittodebian? I really like the tool but it also adds a unnecessary template message to Debian Maintainers that I have to delete each time? | 00:33 |
bkerensa | slangasek: osuosl.org mirror seems to be faster for me at least | 00:33 |
slangasek | bkerensa: the template is there because without it, some submitters had the lovely habit of submitting patches with no explanation whatsoever | 00:33 |
slangasek | I'm not enthralled with the particular template we currently have, but it's better than nothing (based on empirical experience) | 00:34 |
bkerensa | slangasek: can I turn off the template since I would much rather write my own explanation each time? | 00:34 |
slangasek | I don't know | 00:34 |
bkerensa | lol | 00:34 |
slangasek | from the source, it doesn't look like it | 00:35 |
slangasek | but that would be a reasonable wishlist bug, to override the template or omit it | 00:35 |
bkerensa | slangasek: unfortunately I cannot file a bug against the ubuntu-dev-tools package | 00:36 |
bkerensa | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-tools | 00:36 |
bkerensa | :s | 00:36 |
bkerensa | disregard | 00:36 |
bkerensa | hi blkperl | 01:11 |
bkerensa | bdmurray: so on the apport removal mp what did I remove to much of? | 01:14 |
bkerensa | bdmurray: Iain Lane looked at the MP I had did for Ubuntu and said it just needed to be re-targeted | 01:14 |
bdmurray | bkerensa: you removed the def doDistUpgrade function | 01:46 |
bdmurray | line 21 in your mp | 01:46 |
bkerensa | huh | 01:56 |
bkerensa | but the function also has enableApport code in it? | 01:56 |
bkerensa | bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1068874 | 01:57 |
lubotu1 | Launchpad bug 1068874 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "does not need to enable apport" [Medium,Triaged] | 01:57 |
bkerensa | in the bug you said def DistUpgrade was not necessary | 01:57 |
bkerensa | def DoDistUpgrade* | 01:57 |
bdmurray | DoDistUpgrade in the bug description was just for context | 02:33 |
bdmurray | if you read the function in DistUpgradeController.py you'll see it does a lot more | 02:33 |
bdmurray | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/raring/ubuntu-release-upgrader/raring/view/head:/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py#L1082 | 02:34 |
bdmurray | from 1092 to 1182 | 02:34 |
bdmurray | so you just want to remove the bit that calls enableApport | 02:36 |
bkerensa | bdmurray: ok thanks for clarification I will fix that up | 02:36 |
bkerensa | bdmurray: so if self.config.getWithDefault("Distro","EnableApport", False): | 03:02 |
bkerensa | self.enableApport() | 03:02 |
bkerensa | under DoDistUpgrade I can remove those two lines? | 03:02 |
blkperl | bkerensa: ? | 04:01 |
bkerensa | blkperl: ?? | 04:19 |
c_smith | ohaithar | 04:25 |
c_smith | bkerensa, would Ubuntu still count as Ubuntu if I use the setup that Cairo Dock sets up nowadays? | 04:26 |
blkperl | bkerensa: oh I was responding to your "hi blkperl" at 17:11 | 04:26 |
c_smith | my mind is telling me yes, but would like to make sure. | 04:26 |
c_smith | it's basically Cairo Dock providing most of the interface with Compiz and a tad of GNOME. | 04:27 |
c_smith | which how they managed that I'll never know. | 04:27 |
bkerensa | c_smith: sure its just a dock | 08:51 |
cy1 | woo | 09:33 |
cy1 | I'm back in business! | 09:34 |
cy1 | And I still need a laptop that doesn't suck | 09:34 |
bkero | Those are available | 16:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!