[00:09] <bkerensa> slangasek: I <3 http://lintian.debian.org/ best thing since Ubuntu Harvest
[00:09] <bkerensa> ;p
[00:20] <slangasek> is it? :)
[00:20] <slangasek> I guess it's a good source of information about issues that maintainers will likely accept patches for
[00:33] <slangasek>   Unable to connect to mirrors.cat.pdx.edu:http: [IP: 131.252.208.27 80]
[00:33] <slangasek> shaaaame
[00:33] <bkerensa> slangasek: I like it and have as a result got some new contributions into Debian.... On another note do you know much about submittodebian? I really like the tool but it also adds a unnecessary template message to Debian Maintainers that I have to delete each time?
[00:33] <bkerensa> slangasek: osuosl.org mirror seems to be faster for me at least
[00:33] <slangasek> bkerensa: the template is there because without it, some submitters had the lovely habit of submitting patches with no explanation whatsoever
[00:34] <slangasek> I'm not enthralled with the particular template we currently have, but it's better than nothing (based on empirical experience)
[00:34] <bkerensa> slangasek: can I turn off the template since I would much rather write my own explanation each time?
[00:34] <slangasek> I don't know
[00:34] <bkerensa> lol
[00:35] <slangasek> from the source, it doesn't look like it
[00:35] <slangasek> but that would be a reasonable wishlist bug, to override the template or omit it
[00:36] <bkerensa> slangasek: unfortunately I cannot file a bug against the ubuntu-dev-tools package
[00:36] <bkerensa> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-tools
[00:36] <bkerensa> :s
[00:36] <bkerensa> disregard
[01:11] <bkerensa> hi blkperl
[01:14] <bkerensa> bdmurray: so on the apport removal mp what did I remove to much of?
[01:14] <bkerensa> bdmurray: Iain Lane looked at the MP I had did for Ubuntu and said it just needed to be re-targeted
[01:46] <bdmurray> bkerensa: you removed the def doDistUpgrade function
[01:46] <bdmurray> line 21 in your mp
[01:56] <bkerensa> huh
[01:56] <bkerensa> but the function also has enableApport code in it?
[01:57] <bkerensa> bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1068874
[01:57] <lubotu1> Launchpad bug 1068874 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "does not need to enable apport" [Medium,Triaged]
[01:57] <bkerensa> in the bug you said def DistUpgrade was not necessary
[01:57] <bkerensa> def DoDistUpgrade*
[02:33] <bdmurray> DoDistUpgrade in the bug description was just for context
[02:33] <bdmurray> if you read the function in DistUpgradeController.py you'll see it does a lot more
[02:34] <bdmurray> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/raring/ubuntu-release-upgrader/raring/view/head:/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py#L1082
[02:34] <bdmurray> from 1092 to 1182
[02:36] <bdmurray> so you just want to remove the bit that calls enableApport
[02:36] <bkerensa> bdmurray: ok thanks for clarification I will fix that up
[03:02] <bkerensa> bdmurray: so     if self.config.getWithDefault("Distro","EnableApport", False):
[03:02] <bkerensa>             self.enableApport()
[03:02] <bkerensa> under DoDistUpgrade I can remove those two lines?
[04:01] <blkperl> bkerensa: ?
[04:19] <bkerensa> blkperl: ??
[04:25] <c_smith> ohaithar
[04:26] <c_smith> bkerensa, would Ubuntu still count as Ubuntu if I use the setup that Cairo Dock sets up nowadays?
[04:26] <blkperl> bkerensa: oh I was responding to your "hi blkperl" at 17:11
[04:26] <c_smith> my mind is telling me yes, but would like to make sure.
[04:27] <c_smith> it's basically Cairo Dock providing most of the interface with Compiz and a tad of GNOME.
[04:27] <c_smith> which how they managed that I'll never know.
[08:51] <bkerensa> c_smith: sure its just a dock
[09:33] <cy1> woo
[09:34] <cy1> I'm back in business!
[09:34] <cy1> And I still need a laptop that doesn't suck
[16:10] <bkero> Those are available