[00:09] Sorry about that, I had to leave right away. [00:09] When I'm working on a bug that involves new behavior, who do I communicate with to decide exactly how it will work? [00:09] The bug is LP #657275. Should I ask how this should work on #ubuntu-devel, on one of the developers mailing lists, or what? [00:09] Launchpad bug 657275 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-bug should save reports offline automatically rather than giving a cryptic error message" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/657275 [00:10] mspencer: I'd say speak to the maintainer of the package [00:11] mspencer: It might also be an idea to look at what the 'whoopsie' package does which is a new crash recorder that landed in 12.04 (I think) [00:14] penguin42: Do you mean the person listed as maintainer on the project's page in launchpad? [00:15] So I should check out what whoopsie does with crash reports to help decide what the new behaviou should be? [00:16] mspencer: I *think* that's the same thing as the package maintainer recorded in the package itself (e.g. apt-cache show apport) [00:17] Yes, it's the same person. Should I email him directly about this? [00:17] mspencer: Worth asking the maintainer of apport/ubuntu-bug if he's already got some ideas, and he might now of a mailing list for discussing stuff; the other thing is that Launchpad has a system for project proposals (blueprints) that are done for fairly large things, although that is getting more complex - start with the maintainer [00:18] penguin42: what do you mean "he might now of a mailing list for discussing stuff"? [00:18] mspencer: Some packages have their own mailing lists where people throw about ideas [00:18] mspencer: so it's normally right to ask/suggest on the mailing list [00:20] The project doesn't look like it has its own mailing list, should I ask on more general mailing list? [00:20] I'm new to bug fixing, so I'm not familiar with this stuff. [00:20] mspencer: Maybe, but I guess I'd start with the maintainer [00:21] mspencer: If you can find an appropriate mailing list that's good because you can see if anyone is already working on a fix, but the maintainer should know [00:22] So I should email him directly about this? [00:22] mspencer: If you can't find an appropriate mailing list, then yes [00:23] mspencer: You can just attach your ideas /thoughts to the bug and see if he notices it [00:24] mspencer: Although be patient - maintainers normall yget zillions of bug mails etc [00:24] I should email him rather than the ubuntu-devel or ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing lists? [00:25] mspencer: You could try ubuntu-devel, although I'm not too familiar with it [00:27] Okay, I'll try ubuntu-devel. Thanks for the help! === pi-rho is now known as pi-rho|away [04:42] * persia mentions that Launchpad's idea of "Maintainer" often has no relation whatsoever to the folk who care about the state of the package in Ubuntu [04:42] (and since Ubuntu refutes the concept of "Maintainer", there's no meaningful way LP could have a good idea) === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [12:47] What happens after apport has done its thing after a crash (collected info, asked the user if a "problem report" should be sent)? I never get the chance to actually report a bug, as is the case when calling ubuntu-bug. === e11bits_ is now known as e11bits [15:48] * penguin42 wonders why my dad always manages to find imaginative ways to break Ubuntu [15:49] he's managed to get a repeatable kernel panic on a bog standard Intel graphics system by plugging it into a KVM switch [16:31] sihg it looks like it's bug 1070690 [16:31] Launchpad bug 1070690 in linux (Ubuntu Raring) "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[] [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 [16:46] why is that bug marked incomplete? [16:49] not sure [16:49] ah [16:49] ali1234: Because Joseph asked for a bisect [16:54] ok [21:04] What happens after apport has done its thing after a crash (collected info, asked the user if a "problem report" should be sent)? I never get the chance to actually report a bug, as is the case when calling ubuntu-bug. [21:16] guntbert: the reports go into a different system now [21:17] see https://errors.ubuntu.com/ and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ErrorTracker [21:18] ali1234: thx - you guessed my next quetion :-)) [21:18] *question [21:18] the technical explanation is at the very bottom of the second page [21:19] ali1234: great, I am reading - have a nice time [21:21] now, if you're wondering how to link together a bug report and a crash dump, i don't think it is possible to do it, at least not yet [21:21] https://bugs.launchpad.net/errors/+bug/1061049 [21:21] Launchpad bug 1061049 in Errors "We should allow users to manually input a linked bug and better present both the create and link options" [Medium,Confirmed] [21:43] against what project do I report a bug when logging in to https://errors.ubuntu.com/ ? [21:45] if its a bug with errors probably https://launchpad.net/whoopsie-daisy [21:45] login itself is a different service I think [21:47] jtaylor: its the login via ubuntu SSO, which is returning a wonderful error [21:47] what kind of error? [21:48] jtaylor: see http://paste.ubuntu.com/1351870/ === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [23:35] i actually tried to login to errors yesterday and it just kept asking for permissions over and over. assumed i didn't have the necessary access rights and gave up.