ScottK | Is kdevelop 4.3.90 -> 4.4.1 something that'd be manageable with an SRU? | 02:26 |
---|---|---|
shadeslayer | It should | 02:26 |
shadeslayer | I already have it filed | 02:26 |
shadeslayer | was going to get to it tomorrow | 02:26 |
shadeslayer | already uploaded it to raring | 02:27 |
ScottK | OK. | 02:27 |
ScottK | Any more word on Dantti? | 02:40 |
shadeslayer | last I heard his wife was flying out | 02:42 |
ScottK | OK. Thanks. | 02:58 |
* shadeslayer found a silly bug | 04:00 | |
shadeslayer | the wallpapers in the wallpaper ui chooser are sorted by the dir names instead of the name provided by the desktop file | 04:01 |
shadeslayer | hooray for silly code | 04:01 |
jussi | Morning all | 07:52 |
Tm_T | morning | 07:56 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
apachelogger | JontheEchidna: please be filing a removal request or something for the old gtk kcm | 09:50 |
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
BluesKaj | howdy all | 10:16 |
apachelogger | JontheEchidna: http://paste.kde.org/605492/ yay or nay? | 10:56 |
apachelogger | ah nvm, that is not new anyway | 10:58 |
apachelogger | still spook yIMHO | 10:58 |
apachelogger | hm | 11:22 |
apachelogger | JontheEchidna: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cyberspace/muon/1.4/revision/1522 vs. http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=phonon-vlc.git&a=blobdiff&h=49de65a603128cdcb2281d60f6235ef8fc61bcf7&hp=0f31b4d7141e54c367036feedab6d83bdbe4a1d2&hb=3f87eafda1efc9a3eba6c7d92263a93673b67dad&f=CMakeLists.txt | 11:23 |
apachelogger | what I am saying is: please define your version via cmake in your top level cmakelists or I'll start crying | 11:23 |
yofel_ | wth...? bug 1063741 | 11:33 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1063741 in Kubuntu PPA "gwenview crash due to libkipi incompatibility" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1063741 | 11:33 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
yofel | is it just me or is kde library handling broken by design? | 11:34 |
apachelogger | no | 11:34 |
apachelogger | digikam library handlign is broken by design | 11:34 |
apachelogger | yofel: if you want some entertainment mention digikam to sune | 11:34 |
yofel | well, I remember similiar stuff with marble a while back... | 11:34 |
apachelogger | he goes :@ 90% of the time followed by a brief :( followed by more :@ | 11:34 |
yofel | lol | 11:35 |
apachelogger | yofel: well, they are all doing it wrong :P | 11:35 |
yofel | well, I know the digikam packaging, so... :@ | 11:35 |
apachelogger | no clue what marble's problem was, but with kipi it's basically that they keep breaking BIC while not addressing that in the plugin part | 11:36 |
yofel | . . . | 11:36 |
yofel | guess I'll put a rebuild of digikam into backports, should "fix" this | 11:37 |
apachelogger | that's what we do traditionally | 11:37 |
yofel | yeah -.- | 11:37 |
apachelogger | actually that crash is weird | 11:38 |
apachelogger | how do you get that | 11:38 |
apachelogger | oh | 11:38 |
apachelogger | if ye don't bump your so you don't get no error | 11:38 |
apachelogger | harrr | 11:38 |
apachelogger | see | 11:38 |
apachelogger | they are using it wrong | 11:38 |
apachelogger | next year at akademy: Phonon: how to not make puppies die from BIC changes and how to use qplugn properly | 11:39 |
yofel | well, libkipi does usually bump the so, as this is about a libkipi8 <-> libkipi9 conflict | 11:40 |
yofel | *unless* digikam ignores that, which would't really surprise me | 11:40 |
yofel | +n | 11:41 |
apachelogger | latter is actually fun because if you can run into a scenario where you definitely want to load a plugin buitl against foo1 into an app using foo2 you have to know how qinterfaces *actually* work | 11:41 |
apachelogger | and interestingly enough phonon in theory supports loading new plugins into old libraries although until I took over plugins were distributed alongside libphonon so you could not even get to a point where you'd have an old libphonon and a new plugin ^^ | 11:42 |
apachelogger | yofel: there is no conflict | 11:42 |
yofel | then how would it crash? | 11:42 |
apachelogger | well, there would be a conflict if you try loading both at the same time | 11:43 |
apachelogger | which could happen if they are using it wrong :P | 11:43 |
yofel | looks like that happens. | 11:43 |
apachelogger | broken by design | 11:44 |
apachelogger | I imagine it goes like this | 11:44 |
apachelogger | libkipi9 -> loads plugins -> plugins load libkipi8 | 11:44 |
apachelogger | how do you prevent that ... plugins mark the soname they were built against | 11:45 |
apachelogger | libkipi9 -> can only load plugins built against libkipi9 -> plugins need not laod libkipi9 (already in address space) | 11:45 |
apachelogger | in the simplest of implementations the plugin desktop file would have X-KDE-BC=9 | 11:46 |
yofel | ... meaning you would still end up with having to rebuild everything? | 11:46 |
apachelogger | yofel: you always do, that is why good libaries need not break their BC all the time | 11:46 |
apachelogger | BUT | 11:46 |
apachelogger | your app would not crash | 11:46 |
yofel | true | 11:47 |
apachelogger | it would perhaps not have an plugins to load | 11:47 |
apachelogger | but it would not fucking crash | 11:47 |
apachelogger | q.e.d they are using it wrong :P | 11:47 |
apachelogger | now imagine digikam where to static link libkipi and runtime load plugins from the sytem :D :D :D | 11:48 |
* apachelogger sees that totally happen in the future :P | 11:48 | |
yofel | apachelogger: please stop, I would like to keep the bit of sanity I have left | 11:48 |
yofel | and explain that to gilles..... | 11:48 |
yofel | kde bug 308019 if you ever feel like ranting | 11:50 |
ubottu | KDE bug 308019 in BatchProcessImages "Gwenview crash after using Plugins->Collections->Border images" [Crash,Resolved: waitingforinfo] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308019 | 11:50 |
apachelogger | yeah at next years akademy in my keynote about not messing up that library crap ^^ | 11:50 |
yofel | :D | 11:50 |
yofel | seems like I should be rebuilding kamoso and kphotoalbum too while at it | 11:51 |
apachelogger | ScottK, Riddell: council approval still pending for specs right? | 11:58 |
Quintasan_ | Riddell: Did you happen to post our Kubuntu Team photo somewhere? I'd like to include it in my blog post if I ever get to it | 12:01 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
yofel | Quintasan: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jriddell/8169377493 | 12:02 |
Quintasan | yofel: thanks | 12:02 |
* Quintasan goes back home to learn algebra | 12:02 | |
Quintasan | test tomorrow :l | 12:02 |
Quintasan | hurrr too much stuff pilling up | 12:04 |
Quintasan | gotta take care of it fast or it will kill me | 12:04 |
Riddell | apachelogger: yes I want to tidy up the work items and organise a meeting todady | 12:05 |
apachelogger | goody, I have meeting topics too ^^ | 12:05 |
Quintasan | Riddell: as in meeting today or just setting up a poll? | 12:08 |
apachelogger | Quintasan: today ofc | 12:08 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
Riddell | Quintasan: setting up a poll | 12:16 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== Guest82284 is now known as Mamarok | ||
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
ScottK | apachelogger: Yes. We need a meeting yet. | 13:36 |
apachelogger | ScottK: transitional packages for settings yay or nay? | 14:21 |
apachelogger | oh lol, 12.04 is supported until 17.04 so the transitionals would not be removalable until 17.10 ^^ | 14:25 |
debfx | question is if LTS -> LTS+2 upgrades will be supported (which I doubt) | 14:30 |
debfx | 12.04 -> 17.04 will certainly not be supported | 14:31 |
apachelogger | u sure about htat? | 14:31 |
apachelogger | perhaps it is just me but it would sorta defeat the purpose if in 2017 I then have to upgrade to 15. to get to 17. | 14:32 |
debfx | yes, unless the LTS schedule changes | 14:33 |
apachelogger | debfx: what does this have to do with the schedule itself? | 14:34 |
debfx | it seems unlikely that you stick with an LTS for 5 years and then want to upgrade to the latest non-LTS release | 14:34 |
apachelogger | 17.05 would be LTS | 14:34 |
apachelogger | 17.04 | 14:34 |
apachelogger | or am I getting it wrong | 14:34 |
apachelogger | what year do we ahve? | 14:34 |
apachelogger | Oo | 14:34 |
* Quintasan needs his burndown chart | 14:34 | |
debfx | 16.04 would be an LTS | 14:35 |
apachelogger | 12.04 -> 14.04 -> 16.04 | 14:35 |
apachelogger | ah yes | 14:35 |
Quintasan | What debfx said | 14:35 |
apachelogger | debfx: so we have 16.10 as removal point for transitional packages... | 14:35 |
debfx | or 14.10 if LTS -> LTS+2 won't be supported (atm they aren't) | 14:36 |
apachelogger | actually I fail to find documentation on that in general | 14:39 |
apachelogger | seems we just happen to be nice enough to allow an LTS2LTS upgrade path | 14:39 |
yofel | we do support LTS upgrades (at least I try to), but I'm not keen on supporting LTS -> LTS+2 | 14:41 |
yofel | that'll probably too many system architecture changes to support | 14:42 |
apachelogger | my point is there is no official documentation saying we/ubuntu does that | 14:42 |
yofel | insert be somewhere | 14:42 |
apachelogger | or maybe I can't find it | 14:42 |
yofel | uh... update-manager defaults to LTS upgrades if you run a LTS release? | 14:43 |
yofel | why would it do that if that weren't supported | 14:43 |
apachelogger | dunno | 14:43 |
apachelogger | there still is no statement | 14:43 |
Riddell | it's always been the case that release to release+1 and LTS to LTS+1 upgrades are supported and nothing else | 14:44 |
apachelogger | there still is no statement | 14:46 |
apachelogger | "Upgrades to new versions of Ubuntu are and always will be free of charge." what it says on the LTS wiki page about upgrades | 14:46 |
apachelogger | Riddell, ScottK: the mighty release team probably should issue a statement to clearify | 14:47 |
apachelogger | also documentation should then be updated accordingly | 14:47 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
yofel | ScottK: we should probably hold of 4.9.3 for quantal until kde bug 309787 gets looked into | 15:13 |
ubottu | KDE bug 309787 in general "Krunner does not execute program when press ENTER" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309787 | 15:13 |
shadeslayer | aye, I have hit that as well | 15:14 |
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
apachelogger | oh | 15:16 |
apachelogger | works here Oo | 15:17 |
tsimpson | I've seen it "sometimes" | 15:17 |
yofel | type 'konso' for konsole | 15:17 |
tsimpson | most of the times it works, sometimes not | 15:17 |
apachelogger | yeah | 15:17 |
apachelogger | never seen it not work | 15:17 |
yofel | yeah, it's a bit random here too | 15:17 |
apachelogger | though I really mostly launch apps via a terminal | 15:17 |
shadeslayer | dunno, doesn't work for me | 15:17 |
apachelogger | bad experiences with krunner made me not want to use it | 15:17 |
shadeslayer | heh | 15:18 |
yofel | actually | 15:18 |
apachelogger | ordering is all off if you ask me | 15:18 |
apachelogger | half the time I got some other crap listed | 15:18 |
yofel | I can open something *once* with a keyword | 15:18 |
apachelogger | keyword? | 15:19 |
yofel | typing 'kons' opens, konsole, but doesn't work a second time | 15:19 |
yofel | -, | 15:19 |
apachelogger | can do it as often as I want | 15:19 |
apachelogger | haha :P | 15:19 |
yofel | grrrr | 15:19 |
apachelogger | yofel: gdb trace that I'd say | 15:19 |
tsimpson | I think it's a focusing issue, I type "kons" and Konsole shows up, but I can't interact with the menu via the keyboard. but, if I press Up then Down the text box looses focus and the menu gains it | 15:20 |
yofel | hm, no time for that now, but I would sure like to know why my xsession-errors is full of | 15:21 |
yofel | (Parent is Solid::Backends::UDisks::UDisksDevice(0x21dd0c0), parent's thread is QThread(0x1c09260), current thread is ThreadWeaver::Thread(0x1c30ec0) | 15:21 |
yofel | QObject: Cannot create children for a parent that is in a different thread. | 15:21 |
kubotu | ::qt-bugs:: [1077965] qt4 applications over X forward run slower than with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077965 (by Stefan Pielmeier) | 15:21 |
apachelogger | because that is a qdebug | 15:21 |
* apachelogger wants award for most correct but useless answer of the day | 15:22 | |
apachelogger | yofel: don't see that either *shrug* | 15:23 |
yofel | hm, no wonder christoph blames aseigo with a commit like this: http://paste.kde.org/605696 | 15:23 |
tsimpson | -pedantic mode enabled | 15:23 |
tsimpson | it's actually a qWarning() | 15:23 |
yofel | ah, nvm then I guess | 15:23 |
apachelogger | still bogus code | 15:28 |
apachelogger | we should totally force QT_FATAL_WARNINGS while in development | 15:29 |
apachelogger | annoy upstream into fixing their codez | 15:29 |
yofel | we should also be building tests. Quintasan: any progress on that side? (or I guess not yet had any time to look at it?) | 15:32 |
shadeslayer | yofel: is the janitor online? | 15:33 |
yofel | didn't hear anything yet, you would have to ask czajkowski or wgrant | 15:33 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
Quintasan | yofel: What tests? | 15:34 |
apachelogger | built from 4.9 branch still not broken | 15:35 |
apachelogger | .... | 15:35 |
Quintasan | yofel: Tests for Qt or kdelibs or what? | 15:35 |
Quintasan | I don't think we can get anything to build in neon ppa | 15:35 |
Quintasan | xD | 15:35 |
Quintasan | wow | 15:36 |
Quintasan | yofel, shadeslayer: 55k builds | 15:37 |
Quintasan | and only 4,6k failuers | 15:37 |
Quintasan | apachelogger: 67.2 GiB (100.00%) of 32.0 GiB | 15:37 |
Quintasan | sup | 15:37 |
shadeslayer | xD | 15:37 |
apachelogger | launchpad | 15:37 |
apachelogger | that's what's up | 15:37 |
yofel | Quintasan: any tests (though I meant kde) | 15:38 |
Quintasan | This makes me giggle everytime I see it | 15:38 |
yofel | Quintasan: and as the recipes still build who cares :P | 15:38 |
Quintasan | yofel: not today, preparing for test | 15:38 |
yofel | sure, was just curious | 15:38 |
Quintasan | will look at maliit tomorrow and kdelibs later on | 15:38 |
Quintasan | maliit is my priority list now | 15:38 |
apachelogger | yofel: time to ask for more spaces | 15:38 |
Quintasan | apachelogger: Guess what I did at UDS | 15:38 |
apachelogger | either they run out of spaces or fix it | 15:39 |
apachelogger | former would be more fun TBH | 15:39 |
Quintasan | apachelogger: I asked Laura if she could increase the size to 16GB, instead she gave us ADDITIONAL 16GB | 15:39 |
Quintasan | Guess being vague about that was a good thing | 15:39 |
apachelogger | Quintasan: unused U1 resources need to go somewhere :P | 15:40 |
Quintasan | Well, we are using that space pretty freely | 15:40 |
Quintasan | more than 200% of the size allocated | 15:41 |
Quintasan | :P | 15:41 |
Quintasan | A total of 59927 builds have been dispatched for this PPA. | 15:41 |
Quintasan | almost 60k build | 15:41 |
apachelogger | which is why you should request more spaces | 15:41 |
apachelogger | :P | 15:41 |
yofel | I should request more space for the scribus ppa | 15:42 |
yofel | that uses 16GiB of 2GiB :D | 15:42 |
Quintasan | apachelogger: Go ahead and try doing that | 15:42 |
Quintasan | I so DON'T want to see their reaction to "Hey guys, we'd like some more space for Project Neon PPA" | 15:43 |
yofel | :D | 15:43 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
apachelogger | Quintasan: move to OBS then | 15:47 |
apachelogger | as I see it software is broken and until software is fixed we needs moar spaces to keep production rolling | 15:47 |
xnox | apachelogger: OBS does not have universe and debian main is "filtered" as well. | 15:47 |
xnox | plus they install build-deps - one package at a time which kills dpkg...... | 15:48 |
shadeslayer | @_@ | 15:48 |
* apachelogger actually has fixes for latter | 15:48 | |
apachelogger | fixes/rewrite | 15:48 |
Quintasan | apachelogger: Fancy rewriting everything for OBS? | 15:48 |
apachelogger | rewrote | 15:48 |
apachelogger | I am not copyright holder though so those changes will rot somewhere I am afraid | 15:49 |
Quintasan | apachelogger: I mean neon recipes | 15:49 |
apachelogger | Quintasan: oh, hardly an effort with OBS | 15:50 |
yofel | that shouldn't be much work, I mean all you need is a cronjob to push the packages, and a bzr-builder replacement to create them | 15:51 |
shadeslayer | we have a good thing going with LP | 15:51 |
shadeslayer | why screw everything | 15:51 |
apachelogger | because Quintasan refuses to ask for more spaces :P | 15:51 |
yofel | OBS doesn't support the dev release though, so I'm not too keen on using it | 15:51 |
shadeslayer | do we even need more space? | 15:52 |
yofel | apachelogger: should be fixed soon anyway once lp is fixed | 15:52 |
shadeslayer | we have like 30 GB's of it | 15:52 |
apachelogger | yofel: s/support/import | 15:52 |
apachelogger | it's not a matter of support it is a matter of import ;) | 15:52 |
Quintasan | I don't care about OBS | 15:52 |
Quintasan | Hopefully once lp is fixed we will be having a surplus of space | 15:53 |
yofel | 32GiB is plenty, if the janitor would be running | 15:53 |
Quintasan | MEANING for builds | 15:53 |
apachelogger | you can give some back then ^^ | 15:53 |
Quintasan | >apachelogger | 15:53 |
yofel | and it's not like anything is actually FAILING | 15:53 |
Quintasan | >implying I'm going to give space back | 15:53 |
Quintasan | No way that's going to happen | 15:53 |
Quintasan | I'm going to use it | 15:53 |
yofel | yeah, extragear and playground have lots of stuff in it ^^ | 15:54 |
apachelogger | next on project neon prn_1_all.deb | 15:54 |
Quintasan | +1 | 15:54 |
apachelogger | oh, that's what you meant | 15:54 |
yofel | come to think of it, someone add muon to neon | 15:54 |
apachelogger | works too I guess | 15:54 |
apachelogger | though playground is a much more headache build source | 15:54 |
apachelogger | *headachy | 15:54 |
yofel | *shrug* | 15:54 |
* apachelogger hungy :( | 15:54 | |
Quintasan | Who'd be insane enough to stuff prn in deb package? | 15:55 |
yofel | if we already can't have qt5 builds we'll go with playround | 15:55 |
yofel | Quintasan: why are you asking a rhetoric question? | 15:55 |
apachelogger | xnox: does one still have to sign canonical's CA to commit to ubiquity? | 15:55 |
Quintasan | yofel: It's not like we are both hiting at the same person, are we? | 15:55 |
Quintasan | hinting* | 15:55 |
apachelogger | well | 15:56 |
apachelogger | as I pointed out earlier on g+, I could totally build a deb with prn without much effort | 15:56 |
Quintasan | Of course it is doable | 15:56 |
Quintasan | The question is, why would you do that | 15:56 |
apachelogger | easy to install | 15:56 |
Quintasan | Depends: mplayer? | 15:57 |
apachelogger | ewww | 15:57 |
xnox | apachelogger: yes, as per http://www.canonical.com/contributors . And well "sign" is actually a web-form and push-button. | 15:57 |
apachelogger | vlc ftw | 15:57 |
Quintasan | >vlc | 15:57 |
Quintasan | No thanks | 15:57 |
Quintasan | Only once you fix mkv | 15:57 |
Quintasan | actually | 15:57 |
Quintasan | s/mplayer/mplayer2 | 15:57 |
apachelogger | mkv is working | 15:58 |
xnox | apachelogger: you know, such that when installer installs crap by accident, you are not liable for it at all. canonical is. | 15:58 |
apachelogger | perhaps the ubuntu build is broken again :P | 15:58 |
Quintasan | apachelogger: 10bit encodes? | 15:58 |
apachelogger | people always come into #videolan complaining about the broken ubuntu build ^^ | 15:58 |
apachelogger | Quintasan: *shrug* | 15:58 |
apachelogger | xnox: oh, never looked at it that way ^^ | 15:58 |
* Quintasan thinks apachelogger should do something about that if he likes vlc so much | 15:58 | |
xnox | apachelogger: it's _the_ only reason why it's there. such that individual developers are never sued in court. | 15:59 |
xnox | apachelogger: and if you run ubuntu and don't want to be sued, you buy ubuntu advantage, which gives/covers you from legal litigations. which is a service "around ubuntu". | 16:00 |
yofel | xnox: why would you be sued for running ubuntu? | 16:02 |
xnox | yofel: i wouldn't know. but if somebody thinks they can be sued, they can buy protection. | 16:03 |
xnox | yofel: who knows what other people do... | 16:04 |
yofel | true | 16:04 |
xnox | yofel: I mean look at current lawsuits: apple vs android companies, it seems they sue each other with & without reason... | 16:05 |
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
apachelogger | http://paste.kde.org/605774/ | 16:07 |
apachelogger | I am not sure it improved | 16:08 |
Quintasan | shadeslayer: gibe bsns cards designs pls | 16:08 |
yofel | you guys have card designs? | 16:09 |
apachelogger | if one were to run fancy world changes algorithm ideas over the kubuntu-devel list canonical would be free to use them in what ever way they want | 16:09 |
xnox | apachelogger: it means patches on the mailing lists.... | 16:10 |
yofel | geh, sofware-properties falls under the CA as well :/ | 16:10 |
xnox | apachelogger: and kubuntu-devel mailing lists are not part of the contributor projects. | 16:11 |
xnox | apachelogger: so wtf dude =) | 16:11 |
apachelogger | xnox: it says any work of authorship and it says submitted by any form to canonical or someone acting on behalf of canonical | 16:11 |
apachelogger | any work of authorship includes a mail in which I explain an algorithm solving some NP stuff, and I am reasonable certain kubuntu-devel is run by someone acting on behalf ov canonical | 16:12 |
xnox | apachelogger: please read the definition of "Material" and specifically that "submissions" are to the purpose of importing "material" | 16:13 |
yofel | well, as I understand it "on behalf of canonical" could just be someone reading the ML as well | 16:13 |
xnox | s/importing/improving/ | 16:13 |
kubotu | xnox meant: "apachelogger: please read the definition of "Material" and specifically that "submissions" are to the purpose of improving "material"" | 16:13 |
xnox | and the agreement covers the software projects only as listed on the contributors page.... | 16:14 |
apachelogger | where does it say that? | 16:15 |
apachelogger | i.e. I know that it used to say that, I cannot find it in the present version | 16:15 |
xnox | read carefully and the full thing, and please do not post snippets without full context and spread fud. | 16:16 |
apachelogger | xnox: it does not say this is limited to the contributors page | 16:20 |
xnox | apachelogger: preable of the pdf second paragraph, last sentence + http://www.canonical.com/contributors list of projects that are covered by the contirbutor agreement. | 16:21 |
xnox | it's a many projects -> to one agreement text, but you establish it for individual "material" or multiples of thereof. | 16:21 |
xnox | kubuntu, nor kubuntu-devel is not included. | 16:22 |
xnox | s/is/are/ | 16:22 |
kubotu | xnox meant: "kubuntu, nor kubuntu-devel are not included." | 16:22 |
* xnox is not a lawyer and not giving any advice. | 16:22 | |
apachelogger | "The Agreement may cover more than one software project managed by Us." | 16:23 |
apachelogger | xnox: yes, it does not outline which those are and what point of time | 16:23 |
apachelogger | oh my , language broken, I think I need something to eat | 16:24 |
apachelogger | *and at what point in time | 16:25 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
Tygart | I am on 13.04... Where would I submit a bug or if it has already been submitted? | 20:17 |
Tygart | In (Application>Help) | 20:17 |
Tygart | KinfoCenter> Glossary> Alphabetically, it is not in Alphabetical order? | 20:17 |
Riddell | Tygart: sounds like upstream go to bugs.kde.org | 20:17 |
Tygart | Upstream? | 20:18 |
Tygart | I will go there. Thanks? | 20:18 |
Riddell | upstream means the original authors, we're the packagers and integrators | 20:21 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
Tygart | Riddell: Ok I see. So you don't you also do any editing to the code? | 20:38 |
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
Riddell | Tygart: as little as possible | 21:11 |
ScottK | yofel: OK. Thanks. | 21:34 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
ScottK | apachelogger: It's a wiki page. Please go ahead and fix. | 21:34 |
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
shadeslayer | ScottK: I'll be uploading KDevelop to quantal-proposed in a couple of minutes, please accept | 21:47 |
=== fenris is now known as Guest12065 | ||
Riddell | shadeslayer: what's the SRU bug? | 21:55 |
shadeslayer | bug 1067611 | 21:55 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1067611 in kdevelop (Ubuntu Quantal) "[SRU] Meta bug for tracking KDevelop SRU" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1067611 | 21:55 |
Riddell | OK: kdevplatform | 21:59 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
=== fenris_ is now known as Guest8550 | ||
shadeslayer | Riddell: all done :) | 22:01 |
Riddell | kdevelop-php-docs too? | 22:02 |
shadeslayer | yah | 22:02 |
Riddell | I'll go and brush my teeth while I wait for launchpad to make the diffs | 22:02 |
shadeslayer | heh okay :D | 22:03 |
Riddell | accepted | 22:09 |
shadeslayer | \o/ | 22:09 |
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
shadeslayer | Riddell: could you also sponsor yakuake? I don't think I have upload rights for that | 23:16 |
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
kubotu | ::workspace-bugs:: [1061073] Desktop effects are slow and desktop corruption using mesa 9 @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061073 (by Stefan Freyr) | 23:33 |
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!