| davecheney | lucky(~/src/launchpad.net/juju-core) % time juju status | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| davecheney | machines: | 00:02 |
| davecheney | 0: | 00:02 |
| davecheney | agent-version: 1.9.2 | 00:02 |
| davecheney | dns-name: ec2-54-252-34-17.ap-southeast-2.compute.amazonaws.com | 00:02 |
| davecheney | instance-id: i-b9c8ac83 | 00:02 |
| davecheney | services: {} | 00:02 |
| davecheney | real 0m6.679s | 00:02 |
| davecheney | user 0m0.148s | 00:02 |
| davecheney | sys 0m0.020s | 00:02 |
| davecheney | much better | 00:02 |
| davecheney | wow, m1.smalls are slow, my arm host can compile faster than it | 00:36 |
| davecheney | evenin' | 08:05 |
| davecheney | why is thunderbird so crap ? | 08:06 |
| davecheney | i could possibly do a better job screaming into an acoustic modem | 08:06 |
| TheMue | morning | 08:08 |
| davecheney | hmm, a dopleganger | 08:09 |
| TheMue | davecheney: hi, original ;) | 08:10 |
| davecheney | https://codereview.appspot.com/6853048/ | 08:38 |
| davecheney | https://codereview.appspot.com/6846050/ | 08:38 |
| davecheney | 2nd is trivial | 08:38 |
| davecheney | 1st i feel is straight forward | 08:38 |
| davecheney | but so few things in this world at these days | 08:38 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: 1st LGTM | 08:55 |
| davecheney | rogpeppe: ty | 08:56 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: it seems a pity we have to duplicate all the charm code for a single word change, but i guess that's where we're at | 08:56 |
| davecheney | didn't think there would be much debate about that one | 08:56 |
| davecheney | rogpeppe: i could probably do some symlink shenanigans | 08:56 |
| davecheney | maybe I don't need to duplicate it | 08:56 |
| davecheney | the charms don't seem to care about their names | 08:56 |
| davecheney | i've been hapily putting precise charms on quantal all day | 08:57 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: i know - it's not surprising, there's actually very little difference between series | 08:57 |
| davecheney | rogpeppe: having said that, we do need a separate hook/install for each different build of mongo-2.2.0 we do | 08:57 |
| davecheney | see my email | 08:57 |
| davecheney | i thought that the logic to choose a vesion of mongo was the same as the toos | 08:57 |
| davecheney | tools | 08:58 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: 2nd CL LGTM too | 08:58 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: what's wrong with uploading the version of mongo build for quantal as version 2.2.0 ? | 09:00 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: isn't it built from the same source code as the precise build? | 09:00 |
| rogpeppe | davecheney: and therefore justifies the same version number? | 09:01 |
| davecheney | it comes from my years as a build engineer | 09:01 |
| davecheney | you can't reuse a release number | 09:01 |
| davecheney | not having that 4th digit is the same as reusing juju-core-1.9.2 | 09:01 |
| davecheney | without a -$BUILD suffix | 09:01 |
| davecheney | you have two things in the world with the same name, that are actually different | 09:02 |
| davecheney | in this case mongo-2.2.0-quantal-amd64 was not actually that | 09:02 |
| davecheney | it was renmaed from the precise version | 09:02 |
| davecheney | so to replace it with the real one compiled on quantal felt wrong | 09:02 |
| davecheney | not to mention was subject to http caching nonsense | 09:02 |
| davechen1y | rogpeppe: could i trouble you to putyour LGTM for ap-southeast-2 in writing | 09:17 |
| davechen1y | for some reason it didn't stick | 09:17 |
| rogpeppe | np | 09:17 |
| davechen1y | a | 09:17 |
| davechen1y | ta | 09:17 |
| * davechen1y goes to fix the long broken golang-src PPA's | 09:18 | |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: done | 09:18 |
| davechen1y | ta muchly | 09:18 |
| TheMue | davechen1y: Twice LGTM | 09:19 |
| davechen1y | that zone is ~30 ms away from me | 09:19 |
| davechen1y | but the cloud archives are being served from the UK for the moment | 09:19 |
| davechen1y | which makes cloudinit sucky | 09:19 |
| davechen1y | rogpeppe: in rc | 10:28 |
| davechen1y | is there an unset ? | 10:28 |
| davechen1y | ie, unset GOMAXPROCS ? | 10:28 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: x=() | 10:28 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: (the empty list is equivalent to unset) | 10:29 |
| davechen1y | $GOROOT/src/run.rc:46 | 10:29 |
| davechen1y | so I can do GOMAXPROCS= | 10:29 |
| rogpeppe | GOMAXPROCS=() | 10:29 |
| rogpeppe | hold on | 10:29 |
| rogpeppe | yeah, that works | 10:30 |
| davechen1y | inside that subshell type thing ? | 10:30 |
| rogpeppe | or should do | 10:30 |
| davechen1y | related: windows batch files are hard | 10:31 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: yeah, @{} is equivalent to () in sh | 10:31 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: ha | 10:31 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: paste me the rc script before you submit it and i'll give it a once-over | 10:31 |
| davechen1y | rogpeppe: https://codereview.appspot.com/6847050 | 10:32 |
| davechen1y | this has come up a few times before | 10:32 |
| davechen1y | but fullung keeps nagging me about it | 10:33 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: i guess the rc script should probably call the api checking tool like the others too | 10:34 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: BTW GOMAXPROCS=0 is probably equivalent to unset | 10:35 |
| davechen1y | rogpeppe: the sad thing is Uriel made a C version of run.bash | 10:36 |
| davechen1y | but it got shot down | 10:36 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: the rc script should do @{ ... } || exit $status, but that's for another CL | 10:37 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: yeah, poor uriel | 10:38 |
| rogpeppe | davechen1y: one more push. | 10:38 |
| davechen1y | too painful | 10:39 |
| davechen1y | rogpeppe: if you want to fix the rc script, it wouldn't hurt | 10:39 |
| davechen1y | i don't think anyone but ality is working on it | 10:39 |
| * rogpeppe should probably fire up plan 9 again once in a while... | 10:40 | |
| rogpeppe | actually, i still have a remote login on my old vitanuova account | 10:40 |
| * rogpeppe avoids getting distracted. | 10:41 | |
| davechen1y | rogpeppe: good man | 10:42 |
| niemeyer | Mornings! | 11:26 |
| TheMue | niemeyer: Hello. | 11:30 |
| fss | niemeyer: morning :-) | 11:31 |
| TheMue | Aram: Moin. | 12:16 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: hiya | 13:32 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: yo | 13:33 |
| rogpeppe | anyone up for giving a second opinion on this CL? https://codereview.appspot.com/6811095/ | 13:33 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: *click* | 13:34 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: Will have a look too | 13:39 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: You've got a review. | 13:39 |
| rogpeppe | TheMue, niemeyer: ta | 13:39 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: CertAndKey? Is there a PEM format that has both a cert and a private key? | 13:40 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: yes | 13:40 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: PEM includes an arbitrary number of blocks | 13:40 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: we can split 'em up if you'd like | 13:41 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: but this is the format that mongo requires | 13:41 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: which is why i chose it | 13:42 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: If that's the case, sounds good | 13:42 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: Done, cheers | 13:46 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer, TheMue: there's a followup if you're in the mood: https://codereview.appspot.com/6819115/ | 13:48 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: Will have a look. | 13:49 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: Looking | 13:54 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: i have a slight problem with just renaming things to *PEM - the PEM format doesn't have any implications for what might be in it. So actually StateServerCertAndKeyPEM would be more useful, though long-winded. similarly for pemPath vs serverCertAndKeyPath | 13:54 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: not sure though | 13:54 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: It seems the arguments of startInstance() grow and grow. ;) | 13:55 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: I don't mind too much myself.. looks better than StateServerCertAndKe | 13:55 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: We know what it is, and it should be documented | 13:55 |
| rogpeppe | TheMue: yeah, next time it happens, i'll make a struct for it. | 13:55 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: ok, seems reasonable. | 13:55 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: You already made. | 13:56 |
| rogpeppe | TheMue: oh sorry, i thought you meant the public api... | 13:56 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: No, the private one. | 13:57 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: the "certificate" thing is awkward, because some places use "certificate" to mean both the private key and the certificate itself (the tls package is a culprit in this respect). i'm happy to be less ambiguous though. | 13:58 |
| niemeyer_ | rogpeppe: That's wrong | 13:59 |
| niemeyer_ | rogpeppe: A certificate doesn't contain a private key | 13:59 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer_: yeah, i agree. | 13:59 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer_: tls.Certificate.PrivateKey is a wrongness, i think | 13:59 |
| niemeyer_ | rogpeppe: It contains a public key | 14:00 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer_: it contains a private key too | 14:00 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer_: http://golang.org/pkg/crypto/tls/#Certificate | 14:00 |
| niemeyer_ | rogpeppe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.509 | 14:01 |
| niemeyer_ | rogpeppe: One can put whatever one pleases in a struct | 14:01 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer_: i know that x509 certs don't contain a private key. | 14:01 |
| niemeyer_ | rogpeppe: My point is that a X509 certificate doesn't contain a private key | 14:01 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer_: but some places use a "certificate" name to hold both a certificate and a private key. tls being one such place. | 14:02 |
| niemeyer_ | rogpeppe: Where is it doing that? | 14:02 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer_: as i said, i'm happy not to do that. | 14:02 |
| === niemeyer_ is now known as niemeyer | ||
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: http://golang.org/pkg/crypto/tls/#Certificate | 14:02 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: This is a struct | 14:02 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: A certificate has a respective private key | 14:02 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: sure. it's a struct called "Certificate" :-) | 14:02 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: It's a fine design to be able to refer to it | 14:03 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: Note that, though: | 14:04 |
| niemeyer | Certificate [][]byte | 14:04 |
| niemeyer | PrivateKey crypto.PrivateKey // supported types: *rsa.PrivateKey | 14:04 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: yeah. it did confuse me a little to start with though. | 14:04 |
| === TheMue_ is now known as TheMue | ||
| * niemeyer => lunch | 14:27 | |
| * TheMue => lunch too | 14:37 | |
| TheMue | Back again | 15:20 |
| niemeyer | TheMue: Welcome back | 15:45 |
| TheMue | niemeyer: u2 ;) | 15:47 |
| niemeyer | TheMue: Cheers | 15:47 |
| TheMue | niemeyer: Did you had a good lunch? We today simply had french fries, the kids love them. | 15:47 |
| TheMue | niemeyer: And their dad. :D | 15:48 |
| niemeyer | TheMue: LOL | 15:49 |
| niemeyer | TheMue: Top notch :) | 15:49 |
| niemeyer | TheMue: It was great here too.. Ale cooked us some great Brazillian style food | 15:50 |
| TheMue | niemeyer: We definitely have to visit you for a sprint. | 15:51 |
| niemeyer | TheMue: Agreed! :) | 15:51 |
| * rogpeppe had a sandwich and a banana :-) | 15:51 | |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: Not bad, not bad :) | 15:52 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: I had a banana and two clementines this morning | 15:52 |
| rogpeppe | it *was* my special chilli-cheese sandwich, which i never seem to grow tired of | 15:52 |
| rogpeppe | Brazillian-style food would have been better though :-) | 15:53 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: You guys will have to come over to try that out | 15:54 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: i'd love to | 15:54 |
| niemeyer | We should prepare something for next year | 15:55 |
| TheMue | niemeyer: +1 | 15:55 |
| rogpeppe | it's a bit of a pity there appears to be no way to marshal a *x509.Certificate | 16:02 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: juju.Bootstrap implementation. hopefully not *too* crackful :-] https://codereview.appspot.com/6843059/ | 17:37 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: Cheers | 17:37 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: I'm in another CL now, but hopefully I can get there today | 17:37 |
| rogpeppe | niemeyer: thanks | 17:37 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: Will also look at it, but will last a bit longer. | 17:50 |
| rogpeppe | TheMue: thanks | 17:51 |
| rogpeppe | oh dear, looks like i broke the bootstrap tests in cmd/juju some time ago... | 18:21 |
| rogpeppe | fairly trivial CL to end the day: https://codereview.appspot.com/6848052 | 18:30 |
| rogpeppe | and with that, i'm off for the evening. | 18:30 |
| rogpeppe | night all. | 18:30 |
| TheMue | rogpeppe: N8 | 18:41 |
| niemeyer | rogpeppe: nn | 18:44 |
| niemeyer | I'll also step out for some time, actually.. will be back later to continue reviewing | 18:56 |
| === Aram2 is now known as Aram | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!