[14:42] <coolbhavi> dpm, hey
[14:42] <coolbhavi> wendar, hey
[14:42] <dpm> hi coolbhavi, how are you doing?
[14:42] <wendar> hi coolbhavi
[14:43] <coolbhavi> dpm, fine how about you?
[14:44] <dpm> not too bad :)
[14:44] <coolbhavi> wendar, dpm did the TB send a mail on formal sign off on the new proposed app review process? (just asking incase I missed mails)
[14:46] <dpm> I haven't been following the TB's meetings, but there's been no reply to the e-mail from them, as far as I know
[14:46] <coolbhavi> ah thanks dpm :)
[14:47] <coolbhavi> meanwhile ll wait tomorrow and ping postman developer too on list let me see
[14:49] <wendar> coolbhavi: no comment from them, which we can take as implicit approval. But, I'll send a message making sure that implicit approval is explicit.
[14:49] <coolbhavi> thanks wendar
[14:51] <coolbhavi> wendar, dpm btw I thought arb and interested members should meet some time.. It has been a long time though
[14:51] <coolbhavi> thoughts?
[14:51] <wendar> coolbhavi: that sounds like a good idea
[14:51] <dpm> +1
[14:52] <wendar> coolbhavi: maybe suggest a time on the mailing list, and see if the other 2 members can make it?
[14:52] <wendar> coolbhavi: I'll attend too, if I can
[14:53] <coolbhavi> wendar, dpm meeting early in cycle makes us get a feel of existing problems to scale and the plan ahead in implementing work items from UDS
[14:53] <coolbhavi> I think
[14:54] <wendar> coolbhavi: yes, totally agreed, and good thought
[14:54] <coolbhavi> wendar, sure ll bring it up on list now. thanks!
[14:54] <dpm> coolbhavi, that sounds good, I'd also second wendar's suggestion to start proposing a time, and I can try to make it to the meeting too if I can be useful
[14:55] <cwayne> coolbhavi: hello
[14:56] <coolbhavi> dpm, you are the front face of app devel in ubuntu now :) so its always useful to have your thoughts :)
[14:56] <coolbhavi> hey cwayne how are you doing?
[14:56] <cwayne> coolbhavi: I'm not bad, how are you?
[14:56]  * dpm hugs coolbhavi
[14:57] <cwayne> coolbhavi: think you might be able to push the unity-lens-vm update at some point?  It seems the version in extras somehow wasn't working
[14:57] <coolbhavi> cwayne, m also doing good. I'll have a look now :) link pls
[14:57]  * coolbhavi hugs dpm back :)
[14:58] <cwayne> https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/807/feedback/
[14:58] <cwayne> branch here: lp:~cwayne18/ubuntu-app-reviews/vm-lens
[15:00] <coolbhavi> cwayne, sure ll have a look now and ping back. What was the bug about btw?
[15:02] <cwayne> coolbhavi: there was a problem in bin/unity-lens-vm where it was trying to call UnityLensVmLens instead of VmLens
[15:02] <cwayne> so basically, it didn't work at all :(
[15:03] <coolbhavi> cwayne, no issues ll test again and update
[15:06] <cwayne> coolbhavi: thanks :)
[15:09] <coolbhavi> dpm, wendar sent a mail to the list now
[15:09] <coolbhavi> cwayne, :)
[15:09] <dpm> saw that, thanks coolbhavi to get the ball rolling :)
[15:10] <coolbhavi> dpm, no mention :)
[15:15] <coolbhavi> cwayne, saw the code change :) will test now
[15:15] <cwayne> coolbhavi: thanks :)
[16:37] <coolbhavi> cwayne, done
[16:37] <coolbhavi> cwayne, uploaded the update to quantal extras
[16:37] <cwayne> coolbhavi: thank you!
[16:38] <coolbhavi> tested out n works fine in detecting my 2 VM's\
[16:38] <cwayne> perfect!  i still wonder how that bug got in :/  but no matter, it's fixed now :)
[16:38] <cwayne> coolbhavi: can it be backwards copied to precise as well?
[16:39] <coolbhavi> cwayne, yes ll do that tomorrow as i'm heading to bed now
[16:39] <cwayne> coolbhavi: sure thing, no rush :)  thanks for the help!
[16:39] <coolbhavi> cwayne, no mention! take care ciao!
[16:40] <coolbhavi> dpm, wendar highvoltage mhall119 good night all!
[21:10] <ajmitch> morning
[21:20] <cwayne> mornin ajmitch