| Tsubaki | hello, I think I might have found a security issue | 01:32 |
|---|---|---|
| psusi | what was the bzr version of clean? | 01:34 |
| Tsubaki | ? | 01:34 |
| psusi | git clean == bzr what? | 01:34 |
| Tsubaki | I do not follow | 01:34 |
| psusi | clean the working directory of unknown files | 01:34 |
| Tsubaki | ok? | 01:35 |
| psusi | what was the bzr command for that? | 01:35 |
| psusi | oops, meant to ask that in motu, wrong channel | 01:35 |
| Tsubaki | no clue | 01:35 |
| Tsubaki | lol | 01:35 |
| Machinista | Hi, attempting first triage activity: this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1079056 looks to be a significant feature request imo. Opinions? | 10:48 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1079056 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity does not detect Windows 8" [Undecided,New] | 10:48 |
| xnox | Machinista: it's a bug in os-prober and there are patches in debian to detect EFI systems. | 10:49 |
| Machinista | Ok, thanks. | 10:50 |
| Machinista | 1079056 would appear to be a duplicate of '#978028 os-prober fails to recognize Windows 8' | 11:05 |
| === reels_ is now known as reels | ||
| === ashams_ is now known as ashams | ||
| === reels_ is now known as reels | ||
| === Jikan is now known as Jikai | ||
| Machinista | Hi, if a bug is marked 'fix released' is this the end of the work-flow or is there some verification/close event that comes after this? | 15:20 |
| mitya57_ | Machinista, verification is performed only for stable updates and they are marked fix released after that | 15:28 |
| TheLordOfTime | Machinista, "Fix Released" means Fix Released. After its "released" that bug's "done" so to speak | 15:29 |
| Machinista | mitya57, TheLordOfTime thanks. So a new bug opened for same issue (now fixed released) would be a regression rather than a duplicate? | 15:31 |
| TheLordOfTime | it could be | 15:31 |
| * TheLordOfTime rarely works with regressions, though | 15:31 | |
| * TheLordOfTime should read up on "regressions" ":P | 15:32 | |
| TheLordOfTime | Machinista, did that ever work previously? | 15:33 |
| TheLordOfTime | (still assuming LP Bug 1079056 is the topic) | 15:33 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1079056 in os-prober (Ubuntu) "ubiquity does not detect Windows 8" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1079056 | 15:33 |
| Machinista | TheLordOfTime, yes, still on that topic. | 15:33 |
| TheLordOfTime | Machinista, did that ever work previously? | 15:34 |
| TheLordOfTime | after 978028 was fixed, of course. | 15:34 |
| Machinista | TheLordOfTime, I've seen a fix event, but no confirmation that it was actually fixed, just a comment after the fix that 12.04 also has this problem. | 15:35 |
| TheLordOfTime | if it was SRU'd then someone confirmed the fix... | 15:35 |
| xnox | considering that windows 8 was released on October 26 it has little chances of working =))))) | 15:35 |
| Machinista | And now also repported against 12.10. So, was it ever fixed/working? :) | 15:36 |
| TheLordOfTime | apparently for Oneiric, but... | 15:36 |
| Machinista | Anyway, as to triage.... should it be tagged as a regression do you think | 15:37 |
| TheLordOfTime | i'm trying to reach the stgraber, who marked it fixed released, to get background on it | 15:37 |
| Machinista | kk | 15:37 |
| TheLordOfTime | hiya stgraber | 15:38 |
| stgraber | hey | 15:38 |
| TheLordOfTime | so, Bug 1078056 was marked as a dupe of Bug 978028 apparently, which you handled | 15:39 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 978028 in os-prober (Ubuntu) "os-prober fails to recognize Windows 8" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/978028 | 15:39 |
| TheLordOfTime | was the "fix Released" for 978028 ever verified, or was it assumed? | 15:39 |
| TheLordOfTime | (Precise was in dev i think at the time) | 15:39 |
| stgraber | it was verified with the consumer preview of win8 | 15:39 |
| TheLordOfTime | but not been checked since win8's commercial release? | 15:39 |
| TheLordOfTime | because Machinista here is saying there's a regression since then | 15:40 |
| stgraber | correct. I don't have win8 so can't check (not that I'm really doing any installer work lately) | 15:40 |
| TheLordOfTime | ah, thanks, just trying to gather background :P i'm assuming this is a regression, then, no clue which regression tag (or just 'regression') is needed. | 15:41 |
| * TheLordOfTime doesn't usually ahndle regressions :PP | 15:41 | |
| TheLordOfTime | bleh stupid keyboard | 15:41 |
| TheLordOfTime | my keyboard should be labeled a regression... regression from those that work >.> | 15:41 |
| stgraber | well, what's the regression? win8 final not being detected isn't a regression as it quite likely never was | 15:42 |
| TheLordOfTime | LP Bug 1078056 has details | 15:42 |
| stgraber | bug 1078056 | 15:42 |
| TheLordOfTime | but the bug bot ain't reporting it here because its already been called | 15:42 |
| TheLordOfTime | <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1079056 in os-prober (Ubuntu) "ubiquity does not detect Windows 8" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1079056 | 15:43 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1079056 in os-prober (Ubuntu) "ubiquity does not detect Windows 8" [Undecided,New] | 15:43 |
| TheLordOfTime | oh so NOW you work | 15:43 |
| * TheLordOfTime kicks ubot2 | 15:43 | |
| xnox | Bug 1 | 15:43 |
| xnox | .. | 15:43 |
| xnox | bug 1 | 15:43 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 | 15:43 |
| TheLordOfTime | so the bugbot is breaking now? | 15:43 |
| TheLordOfTime | HOW DARE IT | 15:43 |
| xnox | stgraber: was it verified in uefi or bios? | 15:44 |
| stgraber | right, so still not a regression, I don't believe os-prober ever detected win8 on that machine | 15:44 |
| stgraber | xnox: bios | 15:44 |
| stgraber | my guess is that os-prober simply doesn't support detecting Windows on UEFI (or at least win8 on uefi) or win8 changed something in the magic value for the final release | 15:45 |
| xnox | stgraber: so I don't believe we have support to os-probe other uefi installs.... | 15:45 |
| xnox | there are patches about it on debian bts but I have not poked them. | 15:45 |
| stgraber | in either case, doesn't match the definition of regression which is "something that used to work with an earlier version of the package and stopped working in a later version" | 15:45 |
| TheLordOfTime | see, this is why release people should lurk here more :p | 15:46 |
| stgraber | xnox: I did a quick check and we're in sync with Debian on os-prober (+ a small delta) so if they implemented uefi code, it's not been released yet | 15:46 |
| TheLordOfTime | they know information on "regressions" | 15:46 |
| TheLordOfTime | i don't :P | 15:46 |
| * TheLordOfTime returns to trying to fix his boot partition | 15:47 | |
| Machinista | Ok, interesting conversation. Seems that 1079056 should be left in new state. | 15:48 |
| TheLordOfTime | stgraber, so this bug is already existing in Debian as a bug that should be fixed? | 15:49 |
| TheLordOfTime | if so it should be linked to the LP | 15:52 |
| stgraber | TheLordOfTime: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687921 | 15:52 |
| ubot2 | Debian bug 687921 in os-prober "Make os-prober to support efi loaders" [Normal,Open] | 15:52 |
| * TheLordOfTime subscribes | 15:53 | |
| Machinista | Sounds liek a wishlist item then, not a bug. Someone want to do the honours? | 15:57 |
| TheLordOfTime | i could if LP wasnt timing out for me | 15:58 |
| * TheLordOfTime is getting network-side timeouts on his end | 15:58 | |
| === mitya57_ is now known as mitya57 | ||
| TheLordOfTime | stgraber, thanks for hopping over here to help :) | 16:08 |
| stgraber | np | 16:10 |
| Machinista | TheLordOfTime, stgraber and thanks to you both for helping me triage my 1st bug :) | 16:16 |
| Machinista | ..should've chosen an earier one/ | 16:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | :P | 16:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | well, everyone starts somewhere :P | 16:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | me, i didn't even start out in bugs :p | 16:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | ended up there though | 16:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | :P | 16:17 |
| Machinista | Oh, it's the sort of place people...end up? :p | 16:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | no, that's just me :p | 16:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | some people like working with bugs and start there | 16:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | i started out with support in general :P then started working with the nginx team, started working in bugs, and now i'm working with bugs a ton :P | 16:19 |
| Machinista | That's great. Someone needs to chap. | 16:20 |
| Machinista | TheLordOfTime out of interest, how does a report get transferred, tagged w/e as wishlist? | 16:23 |
| TheLordOfTime | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status | 16:24 |
| TheLordOfTime | Wishlist is an importance. | 16:24 |
| TheLordOfTime | Triaged goes with it. | 16:24 |
| TheLordOfTime | Wishlist items, when bugcontrollers are aware of it, get marked as such (usually feature requests) | 16:25 |
| TheLordOfTime | the Triaged status goes with them usually... | 16:25 |
| TheLordOfTime | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage | 16:25 |
| TheLordOfTime | that's the triage guide | 16:25 |
| TheLordOfTime | it explains most stuff | 16:25 |
| TheLordOfTime | there's special bugs though, they have slightly different rules | 16:25 |
| * TheLordOfTime never deals with those | 16:26 | |
| Machinista | :) thanks | 16:26 |
| TheLordOfTime | certain statuses can only be set by bugcontrol, and importance can only be set by bugcontrol, for bugs within Ubuntu's purview. certain teams have bugcontrol though, i forget what they are... | 16:27 |
| * TheLordOfTime smells bacon | 16:27 | |
| TheLordOfTime | now i'm hungry :/ | 16:27 |
| * TheLordOfTime walks off | 16:27 | |
| === francisco is now known as Guest1717 | ||
| mspencer | What is the best mailing list to ask a question about correct way a bug fix should work? The bug is LP #657275 | 18:17 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 657275 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-bug should save reports offline automatically rather than giving a cryptic error message" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/657275 | 18:17 |
| hggdh | mspencer: you can use ubuntu-devel; but pitti already suggested the action, and he is one of the authors of apport/ubuntu-bug | 18:31 |
| mspencer | hggdh: Do you mean the text of the message? My question is about what should be done with the report if the user chooses to save it. | 18:34 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| hggdh | mspencer: ah, OK. Then ubuntu-devel is a good place. Or you can go to the #ubuntu-devel channel and directly ask pitti (but not today, he has already left for the day, Europe TZ, I think UTC+1|2) | 18:36 |
| mspencer | What would be better? | 18:38 |
| hggdh | either, I think. Pinging him directly has the potential to get a faster answer (tomorrow). Emailing ubuntu-devel will get more views, OTOH. If you ping him, make sure to add context (like pitti: png re. bug 657275) | 18:40 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 657275 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-bug should save reports offline automatically rather than giving a cryptic error message" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/657275 | 18:40 |
| hggdh | bah | 18:40 |
| mspencer | hggdh: Okay, thanks for your help! | 18:47 |
| hggdh | yw | 18:49 |
| mspencer | I've reported a bug that turned out to be a duplicate of a bug that has been fixed. Do I need to do anything to the bug I reported to close it or something? | 18:59 |
| hggdh | mspencer: if it is set as a dup, no, you do not need to do anything else | 19:00 |
| hggdh | (duplicates are automagically disqualified) | 19:01 |
| mspencer | The bug is #1078895. Someone replied to me when I posted the bug and said it was a dup, but I don't think anything has been done to my bug report. | 19:02 |
| mspencer | LP #1078895 | 19:03 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1078895 in openshot (Ubuntu) "Importing an image sequence messes up GUI" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1078895 | 19:03 |
| hggdh | yes, this is not an official dup yet. | 19:04 |
| mspencer | Am I as the reporter responsible for marking this as a dup? | 19:05 |
| hggdh | mspencer: the other bug was fixed in a (to precise) future version, it seems | 19:05 |
| mspencer | It looks like this is a dup of LP #505578 | 19:06 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 505578 in OpenShot Video Editor "Icons etc. disappearing" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/505578 | 19:06 |
| hggdh | if you can confirm it is a dup, you can go ahead and mark if as so | 19:06 |
| hggdh | mspencer: to find out if, and what, Ubuntu versions carry this corrected openshot you can use rmadison | 19:07 |
| hggdh | on it I seem that Quantal (and Raring) are running 1.4.3, so the fix should already be there | 19:08 |
| hggdh | mspencer: rmadison is in the devscripts package, if you are interested | 19:08 |
| mspencer | Why do I need to know what versions carry the corrected version? Just if I wanted to use the current version? | 19:10 |
| hggdh | mspencer: well, you might want to -- say -- run quantal, and check on it | 19:11 |
| hggdh | you are *not* required to, of course | 19:11 |
| mspencer | hggdh: So I should run quantal before I mark it as a duplicate? | 19:12 |
| mspencer | To make sure that my problem is fixed? | 19:12 |
| hggdh | mspencer: this would be ideal | 19:15 |
| mspencer | hggdh: thanks! | 19:17 |
| hggdh | mspencer: you are extremely welcome. Thank YOU for helping | 19:18 |
| mspencer | I have 12.10 installed in another partition and 13.04 in vm for bug fixing. Which should I test openshot in? | 19:19 |
| hggdh | 13.04 would be OK, it is running the same version as Quantal | 19:20 |
| === tiagohillebrandt is now known as tiagoscd | ||
| === tiagoscd is now known as Guest13392 | ||
| === tiagohillebrandt is now known as tiagoscd | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!