[11:53] could someone please mark this as affecting quantal? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monkeystudio/+bug/1074845 [11:53] Launchpad bug 1074845 in monkeystudio (Ubuntu) "monkeystudio crashes while displaying menu tooltips" [Undecided,New] === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:40] done [13:16] jtaylor, thanks === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [17:01] tumbleweed: the probably better alternative would be to remove the check completely [17:02] but that would require rebuilding what already has picked up .9 [17:02] (which is probably almost nothing) [17:02] how sure are you that patch versions are compatible? [17:02] no [17:02] but if they aren'T the soversion should bump [17:02] also, why doesn't that have strict version dependencies to match [17:02] there is no reason to do this compiletime <-> runtime check [17:03] looks like a case of bad upstream [17:03] do minor releases tend to come with sovesrion bumps? [17:03] minor yes, patch don'T no [17:03] probably not [17:03] debian maintainer said no, but he didn't even know about this issue [17:04] sounds reasonable, do it [17:04] such things should be handled by soversion not runtime checks [17:05] yeah [17:06] btw, re the i386 FTBFS, I never reporduced it on sid, and gave up before diving in too deeply [17:06] my i386 chroot just finished I'll try 0.9.1 [17:14] still affected :( === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ [21:52] hi all [21:52] jtaylor: hi... can I ask a thing? [21:52] yes? [21:53] jtaylor: I found at merges.ubuntu.com a package called xorp, and I noticed that you are the last uploader [21:54] and I am wondering If I can work on it [21:55] sure go ahead [21:57] jtaylor: thanks... I think xorp can be dropped (synced), but because I am a beginner and I am not very insecure, I would like to know If it is right. [21:58] yes its pretty likely that it can be synced [21:58] test build the debian package [21:58] if it works we can give a sync a go [21:59] jtaylor: ok. Thanks again [22:03] jtaylor: I am looking for the debian folder (http://packages.debian.org/source/testing/xorp), but I cannot find it. Can use the Ubuntu one? [22:04] use pull-debian-source to get the source [22:04] or dget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xorp/xorp_1.8.5-1.1.dsc [22:06] jtaylor: If I use pull-debian-source, it will retrieve the testing or unstable source? [22:06] by default unstable [22:06] but you can pull testing or experimental too [22:06] see the manpage [22:13] jtaylor: I occured this error http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1368872/ [22:13] are you building in pbuilder? [22:13] I run debuild -S [22:14] that should not be needed when you pull the unmodified source [22:14] you can pass that directly to pbuilder [22:16] jtaylor: it meens that every time I edit a part of a packeg for ubuntu, i have to edit debian/rules too. right? [22:16] not always [22:16] rules takes care of building the package, you only have to touch that if there is something wrong with the build [22:17] and could you tell why I occure that error? [22:17] because you don't have all build dependencies installed [22:17] in this case scons is missing [22:18] you could install them with mk-build-deps -ir [22:18] but for this its better to just dump it in pbuilder [22:19] pbuilder-dist raring amd64 build [22:19] jtaylor: I asked it, in this way I start to recognize some errors and know how to resolve the, [22:19] them* [22:34] jtaylor: the building is ended. Have try to install it too? [22:35] have i* [22:35] you should test the upgrade/install too yes [22:35] there is a pbuilder hook that does that for you [22:36] unfortunately it often screws something up [22:42] jtaylor: ok, it works. Now I am going to make a sync request [22:52] jtaylor: here is the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorp/+bug/1080485 [22:52] Launchpad bug 1080485 in xorp (Ubuntu) "Sync xorp 1.8.5-1.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] [22:57] thx, sponsored