[09:24] <hads> Ouch; https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=39692
[10:51] <lifeless> noice
[17:49] <ojwb> morning
[17:50] <ojwb> hads: android uses the mayan calendar I guess
[19:19] <Atamira> morning
[19:21] <ajmitch> morning
[20:09] <ibeardslee> morning
[20:31] <mwhudson> morning
[20:33] <mwhudson> thumper: do you know when you're going to be in wellington yet?
[20:33] <thumper> morning
[20:33] <thumper> mwhudson: will be passing through in Jan
[20:33] <thumper> wedding is the 19th
[20:34] <thumper> and we'll be starting the weekend before
[20:34] <thumper> and taking several days to get up
[20:34] <ajmitch> thumper: not heading over to LCA?
[20:34] <thumper> so perhaps around the 15th ish
[20:34] <thumper> no, wedding comes first
[20:34] <ajmitch> family member?
[20:34] <thumper> rachel's sister
[20:34] <ajmitch> right
[20:35] <ajmitch> LCA is a good excuse for me to visit family in canberra, at least
[20:35]  * thumper nods
[20:36] <mwhudson> thumper: we were very vaguely thinking of visiting dunedin on wellington anniversary weekend but that's the weekend of this wedding it seems :)
[20:37] <thumper> haha
[20:44]  * mwhudson appears to have forgotten his airnz security question answer
[20:44] <ojwb> "yes, I did pack these bags myself"
[20:45] <mwhudson> i'm talking about the one that involves way too much flash
[20:45] <ajmitch> one of those wonderful sites
[20:45] <ojwb> oh, i've never seen that one
[20:45] <ojwb> sometimes it lets you in to an "accessible" site
[20:45] <ajmitch> don't worry, you can still reset your password & security question by email
[20:46] <ajmitch> sort of defeats the purpose of a separate question
[20:46] <ojwb> https://myairnz.com/myairnz/initAccessibleLinks.do
[20:48] <mwhudson> ajmitch: you can?
[20:48] <ajmitch> I managed to, since I'd misspelt the answer to the security question
[20:50] <mwhudson> i guess i'll just phone them up and social engineer my way back into my account
[20:50] <ajmitch> shouldn't be hard
[20:51] <ajmitch> does the forgot username or password not allow you through to a password reset eventually?
[20:51] <mwhudson> you have to answer the security question before it will email you a password reset
[20:51] <mwhudson> and if you get it wrong 4 times, it locks you out for 10 minutes
[20:52] <thomi> lifeless: any plans to release a new version of pyjunitxml? We'd like the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/pyjunitxml/+bug/892293 to be packaged in raring :)
[20:52] <ajmitch> I'm sure I managed to get past that point even without the right answer
[20:52] <thomi> otherwise I'll build it into our PPA
[20:52] <lifeless> thomi: lets see
[20:53] <thomi> The latest release into raring seems to be 0.6-1 which doesn't contain the fix
[20:54] <ajmitch> the other alternative is to just add that change as a patch against the package in raring, but an upload to debian would be preferable
[20:54] <ajmitch> if you're lucky you might even get the change past the debian release team
[20:55] <lifeless> thats correct
[20:55] <lifeless> so
[20:55] <lifeless> I want to hand this off to the python team in debian
[20:55] <lifeless> release done to pypi
[20:56] <thomi> cool - in the meantime I'll build a version to our PPA
[20:56] <ajmitch> though the DPMT uses SVN still for packages
[20:57] <lifeless> ajmitch: shrug, I won't care at that point.
[20:57] <ajmitch> fair enough
[20:57] <lifeless> I'm short on time at the moment, if someone else wants to NMU it to debian, or even do the DPMT prep for it, that would be great
[20:57] <ajmitch> I could probably svn-inject it there if I find some time for it soon
[20:59] <lifeless> well, packaging only is trivial :)
[21:01] <ajmitch> it's dealing with the piles of open bugs :)
[21:02] <lifeless> hmm, shouldn't be any/many on junitxml
[21:02] <lifeless> but who knows, debbugs is shocking
[21:03] <ajmitch> 3 there, 2 of them minor & 1 asking for a python3 version
[22:16] <thomi> ajmitch: If you have the time, I'll swap you: A beer at the next codecraft in return for a source package of pyjunitxml with those fixes for quantal & raring :)
[22:18] <ajmitch> thomi: fixing for quantal is harder, for sure
[22:18] <ajmitch> just requires convincing people that it's a worthwhile fix to make, the patch looks simple at least
[22:18] <thomi> ajmitch: well, I was just going to dput it into my PPA
[22:18] <thomi> which all our CI & AL jobs look at
[22:18] <thomi> so that's good enough for me :)