| simplew | glebihan: hi | 00:26 |
|---|---|---|
| simplew | glebihan: do you how is possible to see the package version/release that was deleted in launchpad? | 00:27 |
| === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh | ||
| === Mission-Critical is now known as MissionCritical | ||
| === jam1 is now known as jam | ||
| === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetsharl | ||
| === Sweetsharl is now known as Sweetshark | ||
| didrocks | hey | 11:28 |
| didrocks | czajkowski: I'm getting a lot of fail to upload recently on ~unity-team/staging ppa. Did anything change? The fail to upload seems to happen because there is another more recent version waiting to build. However, it's the case for a year now that we have this high rate of upload and I never noticed that it was failing to upload because of it before. | 11:30 |
| mitya57 | hi, can anybody please change lp:nose to point to lp:~mitya57/nose/trunk? | 11:30 |
| mitya57 | (upstream moved development from bitbucket to github, so the current branch is out-of-date). | 11:31 |
| wgrant | didrocks: Nothing's changed there in several years | 11:34 |
| didrocks | wgrant: ok, I'm a little bit confused by the fact the upload is rejected though. We do have another source waiting to build, but what happens if it fails? We could have a more recent version published | 11:35 |
| wgrant | mitya57: Done, thanks for letting us know | 11:36 |
| didrocks | wgrant: maybe I just start to notice because our uploader (after a local build) is faster nowdays | 11:36 |
| mitya57 | wgrant, thanks | 11:36 |
| wgrant | didrocks: Superseded builds have their uploads rejected for ancient, complicated, and messy reasons. It isn't usually a problem because the time between uploads is almost always greater than the build time, except when someone uploads a quick fix, in which case you usually don't want to be publishing the old one anyway | 11:37 |
| didrocks | wgrant: right, but for continous integration, every commit is published on a ppa, so the number of builds can be high. I'm just surprised I didn't turn into it that much until recently (and the development is lower than what it was) | 11:39 |
| didrocks | but ok, if nothing changed in your side, that's all I wanted to ensure :) | 11:39 |
| wgrant | Ah, so that's why our build queues are so huge :) | 11:39 |
| wgrant | But yeah, nothing's changed on our end | 11:39 |
| didrocks | wgrant: thanks! I think I'll just filter those emails | 11:40 |
| wgrant | It's not ideal, but it's a bit difficult and probably not worth it right now to make LP cope | 11:42 |
| wgrant | So filtering may indeed be best for now | 11:42 |
| os_ | hi | 11:43 |
| os_ | i am planing to make a dict dictionary | 11:43 |
| os_ | and i wonder if launchpad primt dictionary databases to be hosted | 11:44 |
| os_ | amy ideas pls ? | 11:47 |
| czajkowski | os_: what do you mean? | 11:50 |
| os_ | i am planing to make a "dict" database | 11:50 |
| os_ | czajkowski: it is dictionary database | 11:51 |
| czajkowski | ah | 11:51 |
| os_ | i want to host the database (it is not programming project) in launchpad | 11:52 |
| czajkowski | not sure let me go and ask | 11:52 |
| czajkowski | wgrant: any ideas | 11:52 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-brb | ||
| === matsubara-brb is now known as matsubara | ||
| mapreri | I've just add a new gpg key to my launchpad account, and today was release the new CoC. I'm looking for resignin (also with the new key) the CoC, but at https://launchpad.net/~mapreri/+codesofconduct I don't find any links that allow this. So, what have I to do? Or what do you suggest to do? | 20:30 |
| maxb | mapreri: The last CoC that I can see was released in 2005 | 20:34 |
| czajkowski | maxb: version 2.0 was release earlier on today | 20:35 |
| czajkowski | https://launchpad.net/codeofconduct/2.0 | 20:35 |
| maxb | lp is lying to me then | 20:36 |
| maxb | "The current version is 2.0, released 2005-04-12" | 20:36 |
| mapreri | czajkowski: I've just see those page is outdated... http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2012/11/19/coc-version-2-0-has-been-released/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=coc-version-2-0-has-been-released | 20:36 |
| mapreri | the last release was today | 20:37 |
| czajkowski | sinzui: why does the CoC say latest version is 2.0 released 2005-04-12 ? | 20:48 |
| czajkowski | was that when version 1 was released? | 20:48 |
| sinzui | czajkowski, Lp does not really support CoC versioning | 20:48 |
| sinzui | There might gs a hack, but since it is not in the db, Lp really does not know | 20:49 |
| * sinzui looks for hack | 20:49 | |
| mapreri | sinzui: are you a lp developer? | 20:49 |
| mapreri | czajkowski: in 2005-04-12 was released the 10. | 20:50 |
| mapreri | 1.0.1 * | 20:50 |
| sinzui | czajkowski, CodeOfConductConf can be changed to use the current data...changing invalidates all previous CoC signings | 20:50 |
| sinzui | mapreri, I am a Lp developer | 20:51 |
| mapreri | sinzui: imho make a sense invalidate all previous coc signings... but i think this is not a shared opinion :P | 20:53 |
| sinzui | czajkowski, The choice are to invalidate everyone's signing, rewrite the code to avoid showing the dates in the UI, add a hack to the conf to have another date. Maybe there is a third option to implement agreements and checkboxes (no file signing) | 20:54 |
| czajkowski | sinzui: would you like the CC to give you a definate answer | 20:54 |
| czajkowski | I can't speak for sabdfl or the others on what way it would be done | 20:54 |
| sinzui | czajkowski, This is a question and an implementation for the Ubuntu community... | 20:54 |
| czajkowski | sinzui: which is the CC in this case to make the call | 20:54 |
| czajkowski | let me go and talk to them | 20:55 |
| sinzui | you are seeing dholbach changes | 20:55 |
| czajkowski | yup | 20:55 |
| czajkowski | that's what we;ve been working on for the last 6+ months | 20:55 |
| bobweaver | Hello there I am trying to upload a package and I am not reciving any emails about a fail. But when I ran dput ppa:myppa/myrepo this.sources.changes . Everything uploaded. You can view the package and also the upload out put ect located here. | 23:34 |
| bobweaver | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~josephjamesmills/ubuntutv/mockup-ppa-branch/files/head:/Unity-2d/ | 23:34 |
| bigjools | did you sign the upload? | 23:35 |
| bigjools | https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/227 | 23:36 |
| bobweaver | with gpg ? | 23:38 |
| bobweaver | Oo at faq page thansk | 23:38 |
| bobweaver | No I def have uploaded and signed key to Ubuntu server | 23:39 |
| bobweaver | I will try on this computer that is also signed and sent to Ubuntu server | 23:39 |
| bigjools | you may have another problem in the package that causes the upload processing software to crash, in which case you need someone to look at the logs | 23:40 |
| wgrant | That key is not on the keyserver | 23:41 |
| bobweaver | Oo | 23:41 |
| wgrant | You have 6 gpg keys associated with your Launchpad account (probably a little excessive), but the one you used to sign that .changes file is not one of them | 23:41 |
| bobweaver | er thanks wgrant yeah one or two where for virtual and one or two are on partitions that I use not so often . Thanks for looking into that. | 23:42 |
| * bobweaver feels silly | 23:43 | |
| wgrant | You'd generally only have one key active at a time | 23:44 |
| bobweaver | Oh I see what you are saying you can do that on your account | 23:48 |
| bobweaver | thanks wgrant | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!