=== fitoschifo is now known as fitoschido [03:20] I've mailed mu bug control application, but the list seems to have rejected my mail. Can an admin of ubuntu-bugcontrol take a look? [03:21] you sure you emailed the right address? [03:22] yep, ubuntu-bugcontrol@lists.launchpad.net [03:22] I used my @ubuntu.com email alias, could that be the cause? [03:23] nope, i email with that all the time to many lists. [03:24] what makes you say your email was rejected, though? :P [03:24] * TheLordOfTime yawns [03:24] note: i'm not an admin, just trying to make sense of why it'd reject [03:24] it has not appeared on the archives,,, I mailed yesterday [03:24] * TheLordOfTime looks backwards in his email history [03:24] is it moderated? [03:24] maybe it's still in the queue... === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ === a16g_ is now known as ypwong === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti === reels_ is now known as reels === chilicuil is now known as chilicuil_not_he === chilicuil_not_he is now known as chilicuil_away === chilicuil_away is now known as chilicuil === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan [19:41] I notice many bug reports are from very old (yet supported) ubuntu versions, how do you confirm these bugs? Do you multi-boot each old version of ubuntu? [19:46] if you wanna confirm them, yep stuart_, you can also use lxc, chroots & vm to test them [19:47] i tend to use VMs. [19:47] easier to destroy/recreate :P [19:47] but, i also keep a copy of each Ubuntu ISO since 9.04, so... :P [20:29] * patr|ck nods and sits down [20:30] would it make a difference regarding the priority of a bug report when you use paid support? [20:32] I sure hope not! [20:32] hmmm [20:32] then i am out of ideas what to do [20:32] Whats your problem? [20:33] i reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1079801 a while ago but nobody is looking at it [20:33] Launchpad bug 1079801 in mesa (Ubuntu) "Second Life & Google Earth do not load for the intel "sandy bridge" gfx chip" [Undecided,New] [20:34] Give it time. you can also ask #kubuntu they might have an idea. [20:36] why #kubuntu? [20:36] its a help channel [20:36] for Qt / KDE based versions of Ubuntu? [20:37] yes Ubuntu + KDE = Kubuntu [20:37] I am off. need to go do some stuff. [20:43] patr|ck: paid> Depends on a lot of things. [20:51] bug 1082030 isn't allowing me to change the status from Fix Released to Confirmed. it is NOT fixed. how do i reopen? [20:51] Launchpad bug 1082030 in skype (Ubuntu) "skype-bin seem to have strange dependency" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1082030 [20:53] Tygart: See above. ;-) [20:55] DonkeyHotei: if apt really does consider it older that's a bug in apt, or the issue is something else altogether [20:56] no, it's a goofup in the .dsc file [20:56] the .dsc file has nothing to do with dependencies [20:56] the dependency needs to specify the -ubuntu suffix for the version [20:57] no, that's what >= is for [20:58] the ~ means it's an older version, per the definitions in apt [20:58] -0ubuntu1 has no ~ [20:58] otherwise it would be + [20:59] there is a ~ before it [20:59] the -0ubuntu1 must be specified in the dependency or it is not installable [21:01] the ~ is part of the dependency definition, and as it's >=, -0ubuntu1 makes it a higher version [21:02] The following packages have unmet dependencies: [21:02] skype-bin:i386 : Depends: libqtwebkit4:i386 (>= 2.2~2011week36) but it is not going to be installed [21:02] E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. [21:02] Candidate: 2.2~2011week36-0ubuntu1 [21:02] is libqtwebkit4:i386 installable *at all* ? [21:02] yes [21:03] $ apt-cache policy libqtwebkit4:i386 [21:03] libqtwebkit4:i386: [21:03] Installed: (none) [21:03] Candidate: 2.2~2011week36-0ubuntu1 [21:03] Version table: [21:03] 2.2~2011week36-0ubuntu1 0 [21:03] 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages [21:03] that says that it's available, not installable [21:03] try 'sudo apt-get install libqtwebkit4:i386' [21:03] oh. oops. [21:04] The following packages have unmet dependencies: [21:04] libqtwebkit4:i386 : Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0:i386 (>= 0.10.31) but it is not going to be installed [21:04] Depends: libgstreamer0.10-0:i386 (>= 0.10.31) but it is not going to be installed [21:04] E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. [21:04] I assumed as much, apt doesn't show cascading dependency issues [21:04] it still means the bug isn't fixed [21:05] well, *that* bug is fixed, please file a new one about your issue [21:06] it's not fixed if it's still not installable, regardless of the cause [21:06] we are tracking bugs by cause [21:06] the cause for the quantal uninstallability was fixed, please file a new bug [21:09] it looks like it's trying to install half of kde on gnome [21:09] just for skype [21:09] and all i386 on 64bit [21:10] something is very wrong [21:10] and i don't know how to trace it [21:11] any ideas? [21:12] hm, it shouldn't pull in half of kde (unless there's a wrong recommend somewhere), but it'll need a fair share of i386 libs to run [21:13] $ sudo apt-get install libxml2:i386 [21:13] Reading package lists... Done [21:13] Building dependency tree [21:13] Reading state information... Done [21:13] Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have [21:13] requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable [21:13] distribution that some required packages have not yet been created [21:13] or been moved out of Incoming. [21:13] The following information may help to resolve the situation: [21:13] The following packages have unmet dependencies: [21:13] dolphin : Depends: kde-runtime but it is not going to be installed [21:13] kde-baseapps-bin : Depends: kde-runtime but it is not going to be installed [21:13] !paste [21:13] For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://imagebin.org/?page=add | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. [21:13] kdebase-runtime : Depends: kde-runtime but it is not going to be installed [21:13] konqueror-nsplugins : Depends: kde-runtime but it is not going to be installed [21:13] kubuntu-debug-installer : Depends: kde-runtime but it is not going to be installed [21:13] libgconf2-4 : Depends: libxml2 (>= 2.7.4) but it is not going to be installed [21:13] libkio5 : Depends: libstreamanalyzer0 (>= 0.7.6) but it is not going to be installed [21:14] Recommends: kdelibs5-plugins (= 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu0.2) but it is not going to be installed [21:14] libsoprano4 : Depends: soprano-daemon (= 2.7.4+dfsg.1-0ubuntu0.1) but it is not going to be installed [21:14] plasma-scriptengine-javascript : Depends: libplasma3 (>= 4:4.6.80) but it is not going to be installed [21:14] qapt-batch : Depends: kde-runtime but it is not going to be installed [21:14] shared-mime-info : Depends: libxml2 (>= 2.7.4) but it is not going to be installed [21:14] E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. [21:14] DonkeyHotei: don't [21:15] didn't realize it was that long, sorry [21:16] tracing the deps in a oneiric chroot resulted in skype not being installable as it tries to install iso-codes:i386 which has no installation candidate [21:16] (that's arch-all) [21:17] which would be a bug in gstreamer though [21:18] but libxml2 isn't installable either, as you can see [21:20] DonkeyHotei: file a bug against skype that it's not installable in oneiric due to broken multiarch dependencies. Someone will have to figure out what to do from three [21:20] *there === komputes is now known as komputes_afk [21:31] ok, bug 1082170, at your service [21:31] Launchpad bug 1082170 in skype (Ubuntu) "skype-bin is not installable on 64bit oneiric due to broken multiarch dependencies" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1082170 === chilicuil is now known as chilicuil_away