[02:18] <pietro10> Hi. is there anyting in libav**-53 that is not in libav**-extra-53? just wondering before I go ahead and install the ubuntustudio-audio metapackage. Thanks.
[02:25] <zequence> pietro10: Don't think many people has investigated, but I would assume nothing would be uninstalled if you added those?
[02:26] <zequence> ah, I see
[02:26] <zequence> conflicts
[02:27] <pietro10> right
[02:27] <zequence> pietro10: What are you needing libav*extra-53 for?
[02:28] <pietro10> it's part of ubuntustudio-audio
[02:28] <pietro10> installing packages that provide the indivudal software components :
[02:28] <pietro10> :/
[02:30] <zequence> pietro10: I think you can hardly avoid installing libav*extra-53
[02:31] <zequence> A lot of packages depend on it
[02:32] <zequence> pietro10: I should ask, what are you needing libav**53 for?
[02:34] <pietro10> I just wanted to know if extra lacked anything that was in the default
[02:34] <zequence> pietro10: It seems mplayer will be broken
[02:34] <zequence> But, other than that, I don't expect there would be a problem
[02:34] <pietro10> no I mean in the libraries themselves
[02:35] <zequence> Well, you can look at the packages to find out :)
[02:35] <pietro10> the package descriptions are identical
[02:35] <zequence> Since mplayer breaks, I expect there is some kind of diff
[02:35] <pietro10> http://packages.medibuntu.org/lucid/libavcodec-extra-52.html says " This package contains a unrestricted version of the libavcodec shared object that should only be used by Debian packages. "
[02:36] <pietro10> not sure what they mean by unrestricted
[02:36] <zequence> But, mplayer doesn't depend on it, after all
[02:39] <pietro10> ok so extra just has more stuff :/
[02:39] <pietro10> thanks anyway
[15:06] <XRS1>  /join #facebook
[15:06] <XRS1> oops
[16:36] <ubuntu> hi
=== ubuntu is now known as Guest25908
[16:36] <Guest25908> hi
[16:37] <Guest25908> i am using ubuntu studio first time
[16:38] <Guest25908> can i use my usb tv stick with this?
[16:38] <zequence> Guest25908: Best way to find out is to try it
[16:39] <zequence> Guest25908: If it doesn't work, there is a chance that you need to do something to get it to work, in which case google is your friend :)
[16:40] <zequence> Guest25908: It's the same on all Ubuntu platforms, concerning a device like that
[16:43] <Guest25908> i have tried many times on other versions of  ubuntu
[16:44] <Guest25908> and i dont have any hope
[16:45] <zequence> Guest25908: What model is it?
[16:46] <Guest25908> its enter tv usb stick
[16:49] <Guest25908> earlier i have tried with pinnacle internal card in my desktop it was success and worked with tv time and some other applications
[16:55] <zequence> Guest25908: Yea, I don't know much about TV tuner cards, but this one does not seem to have a lot of information
[16:55] <zequence> At least not for Linux
[18:11] <cjohnston> ScottL doesn't seem to be around.. does anyone know if the blueprints for Studio Raring are all setup and ready for status.ubuntu.com?
[18:13] <zequence> cjohnston: It's already done
[18:13] <cjohnston> thanks zequence.. just checking
[18:13] <zequence> cjohnston: I'm taking care of that for the most part. May I ask what your interest in that is :)?
[18:13] <cjohnston> zequence: I maintain status.ubuntu.com
[18:14] <cjohnston> did you see the email I sent out a couple of days ago?
[18:14] <zequence> cjohnston: hmm, nope. Let me find it..
[18:15] <cjohnston> zequence: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2012-November/036149.html
[18:15] <cjohnston> fwiw, you may want to sign up to ubuntu-devel
[18:16] <zequence> cjohnston: I got it, but I need to be better at going through my mail
[18:16] <cjohnston> zequence: do all of the blueprints that are related to Ubuntu Studio follow the ubuntustudio-r-<something> this cycle? if so, I can get rid of all of the foundations, app-dev, desktop stuff
[18:16] <zequence> Or, filtering it, that is
[18:17] <cjohnston> I have a feeling that the number of work items you guys actually have for ubuntu studio are artificially inflated by a few members of the team
[18:17] <zequence> cjohnston: All of our blueprints for raring are accepted. I was at #ubuntu-release a couple of days ago for that
[18:18] <zequence> No, I would say all of our workitems are good
[18:18] <zequence> What we did was we separated non release blueprints (stuff that doesn't end up on the ISO)
[18:18] <cjohnston> zequence: are all of the things that are foundations-r actually related to Ubuntu Studio?
[18:19] <cjohnston> http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-raring/ubuntustudio-dev.html  <--- is where I'm referring to
[18:19] <cjohnston> the topic seems to only have 42 work items, where the team itself has almost 180.
[18:20] <zequence> cjohnston: I don't know what those blueprints are about tbh. We only registered the ubuntustudio-r-* ones
[18:21] <cjohnston> ok.. I'll work on getting them removed to clean up the team
[18:21] <cjohnston> if I can
[18:22] <cjohnston> thanks for your help zequence
[18:23] <zequence> cjohnston: np. Still trying to figure out how ubuntustudio-dev is involved in that
[22:58] <studio-user578> aiutoooo
[22:59] <studio-user578> c'è nessuno