[00:00] No luck with two different browsers. [00:01] what page? [00:02] Working now. [00:02] ah the heisentimeout :) [00:02] Yeah [00:07] ScottK: next time get a tcpping to port 443 [00:07] or a tcppath [00:07] OK. [00:09] How is tcpping different than ping? [00:11] TCP probe vs ICMP [00:12] specifically you want [00:16] sudo tcptraceroute launchpad.net -p 443 === benji is now known as Guest55591 [09:11] morning [10:54] DOes anybody know how @ubuntu.com email ddresses are created? [10:54] Does* [10:55] vibhav: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail [10:55] thanks czajkowski! [11:10] it's your @ubuntu.com, it forwards to whatever you chose as your primary email address in your lp account [11:10] so don't, whatever you do, set the @ubuntu.com address as your primary email in lp ;) [11:18] wcpgw [13:41] Hi all, i have report a bug, but i don't see any action on it. The bug is the following : [13:41] https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/975970 [13:41] Ubuntu bug 975970 in Launchpad itself "Messages reviewed in translator mode if you don't check manually "Someone should review this translation"" [Low,Triaged] [13:41] Is the bug reported on correct project ? [13:44] Is the bug reported on correct project ? === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [17:35] hi i am trying to add a further task to a bug (bug #1075181) as it also affects linux-meta-lts-quantal, it allows me to add a raring task, but the precise task does not appear and there is no way to target it to P (as it already is) ... [17:36] Launchpad bug 1075181 in linux-meta-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) "Backport UEFI Secure Boot support for Ubuntu 12.04.2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1075181 [17:36] anyone any idea how one asks for this in the interface? or if its just broken [17:39] if precise task was there at one point, and was deleted with the minus, there is no way to get it back again. [17:39] if I remember correctly, there was a bug about it somewhere... [17:42] xnox, this new task has never had one, other tasks do have them [17:43] this package task does not have one and has never existed for this package before, other package tasks have precise tasks on the same bug (to be clearer) [17:44] ...does something called linux-meta-lts-quantal actually make sense to target at precise? [17:44] mgz, yep, its an lts-quantal backport [17:45] the project is weird, at any rate, which is likely the problem [17:48] you need someone with ubuntu superpowers on launchpad to work out what's up. [17:49] we're minus a sinuzi today due to USA hols [17:49] you mean administrator godpowers :P [17:49] :P [17:51] apw: have you asked cjwatson [17:51] czajkowski, indeed, he has no input on it [17:52] just wondering if he was able to and you're not. [17:53] jcsackett: ping [18:00] apw: the package only exists in precise, so why are multiple bug tasks needed? Are the sru reports not picking it up otherwise? [18:01] xnox, to be consistent with the other 20 packages on the bug where that is not true === Sweetshark is now known as Boxxy === Boxxy is now known as Sweetshark === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [23:26] Hi, I've created a new project in launchpad which will be based on a specification on wiki.ubuntu.com. Should I set myself as the bug supervisor? I'm new to launchpad.