[00:00] <ScottK> No luck with two different browsers.
[00:01] <bigjools> what page?
[00:02] <ScottK> Working now.
[00:02] <bigjools> ah the heisentimeout :)
[00:02] <ScottK> Yeah
[00:07] <lifeless> ScottK: next time get a tcpping to port 443
[00:07] <lifeless> or a tcppath
[00:07] <ScottK> OK.
[00:09] <ScottK> How is tcpping different than ping?
[00:11] <lifeless> TCP probe vs ICMP
[00:12] <lifeless> specifically you want
[00:16] <lifeless> sudo tcptraceroute launchpad.net -p 443
[09:11] <czajkowski> morning
[10:54] <vibhav> DOes anybody know how @ubuntu.com email ddresses are created?
[10:54] <vibhav> Does*
[10:55] <czajkowski> vibhav: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail
[10:55] <vibhav> thanks czajkowski!
[11:10] <tsimpson> it's your <lp username>@ubuntu.com, it forwards to whatever you chose as your primary email address in your lp account
[11:10] <tsimpson> so don't, whatever you do, set the @ubuntu.com address as your primary email in lp ;)
[11:18] <lifeless> wcpgw
[13:41] <Geochr> Hi all, i have report a bug, but i don't see any action on it. The bug is the following :
[13:41] <Geochr> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/975970
[13:41] <Geochr> Is the bug reported on correct project ?
[13:44] <Geochr> Is the bug reported on correct project ?
[17:35] <apw> hi i am trying to add a further task to a bug (bug #1075181) as it also affects linux-meta-lts-quantal, it allows me to add a raring task, but the precise task does not appear and there is no way to target it to P (as it already is) ...
[17:36] <apw> anyone any idea how one asks for this in the interface?  or if its just broken
[17:39] <xnox> if precise task was there at one point, and was deleted with the minus, there is no way to get it back again.
[17:39] <xnox> if I remember correctly, there was a bug about it somewhere...
[17:42] <apw> xnox, this new task has never had one, other tasks do have them
[17:43] <apw> this package task does not have one and has never existed for this package before, other package tasks have precise tasks on the same bug (to be clearer)
[17:44] <mgz> ...does something called linux-meta-lts-quantal actually make sense to target at precise?
[17:44] <apw> mgz, yep, its an lts-quantal backport
[17:45] <mgz> the project is weird, at any rate, which is likely the problem
[17:48] <mgz> you need someone with ubuntu superpowers on launchpad to work out what's up.
[17:49] <czajkowski> we're minus a sinuzi today due to USA hols
[17:49] <TheLordOfTime> you mean administrator godpowers :P
[17:49] <TheLordOfTime> :P
[17:51] <czajkowski> apw: have you asked cjwatson
[17:51] <apw> czajkowski, indeed, he has no input on it
[17:52] <czajkowski> just wondering if he was able to and you're not.
[17:53] <czajkowski> jcsackett: ping
[18:00] <xnox> apw: the package only exists in precise, so why are multiple bug tasks needed? Are the sru reports not picking it up otherwise?
[18:01] <apw> xnox, to be consistent with the other 20 packages on the bug where that is not true
[23:26] <mspencer> Hi, I've created a new project in launchpad which will be based on a specification on wiki.ubuntu.com. Should I set myself as the bug supervisor? I'm new to launchpad.