[07:16] <tjaalton> whee, xserver 1.13.0.901
[07:18] <mlankhorst> \o/
[07:18] <tjaalton> merging
[08:10] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: did you have some pet-patches from fedora to include? I see they disable building acpi support
[08:10] <tjaalton> "no good can come of this." :)
[08:11] <tjaalton> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xorg-x11-server.git/tree/?h=f18
[08:13] <tjaalton> some are included in .901
[08:32] <tjaalton> pushed the branches
[08:33] <tjaalton> didn't see anything of interest on the fedora tree
[09:58] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: well sounds ok, would have to check with intel though if they still use it in their driver or not
[10:14] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: well just disable it for raring should be ok
[10:21] <tjaalton> ffs, we have an ancient plymouth
[10:26] <mlankhorst> yeah
[10:31] <tjaalton> maintained in bzr -> pass
[10:33] <mlankhorst> the only thing I can do in bzr is bzr pull push and diff :P
[10:33] <mlankhorst> maybe I should check out bzr-git
[10:34] <tjaalton> maybe they'll merge it after moving a bunch of bugs against it
[10:34] <tjaalton> where booting sometimes fails
[12:03] <mlankhorst> we'll see :-)
[12:03] <mlankhorst> brb
[16:16] <Dandel> ricotz: i saw the build failure for piglit daily... it's a minor fix... just update eglext.h since it's a build change but not runtime.
[18:01] <mlankhorst> tseliot: I can confirm I can't see any package on experimental stack right now at least ;P
[18:04] <mlankhorst> just nouveau, which it claims is not enabled
[18:08] <mlankhorst> hm might be right about that, too!
[19:35] <tseliot> mlankhorst: you will see some drivers when they are approved in -proposed ;)
[20:07] <mlankhorst> tseliot: how does it recognise nouveau?
[20:09] <mlankhorst> bryce: what happened to turning off spam to ubuntu-x-swat? :P
[20:19] <bryce> mlankhorst, now you can just unsub from the mailing list if you don't want it.
[20:19] <mlankhorst> ah k
[20:28] <mlankhorst> btw vdec kernel changes are heading upstream, still working on the ttm changes :P
[20:37] <tseliot> mlankhorst: I don't think it should
[20:48] <mlankhorst> oh kmod:nouveau
[20:56] <Dandel> mlankhorst: what steps would it take to request the update of two files in 12.04 lts and then 12.10? ( namely /usr/lib/GL/glext.h and /usr/lib/EGL/eglext.h )
[20:56] <mlankhorst> usr/lib ?
[20:56] <Dandel> */usr/include
[20:57] <mlankhorst> see stablereleaseupdates
[21:00] <Dandel> i see... i haven't seen any problems with running programs by simply dropping in the latest eglext.h and glext.h... however, i *do* see problems with compiling programs at times if these get out of date
[21:13] <mlankhorst> Dandel: we can't generally update those though..
[21:15] <Dandel> i see.
[21:21] <mlankhorst> but it ś standardized so having a duplicate in your program shouldn't be hard or conflict