/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/11/25/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== kees_ is now known as kees
=== Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha
=== yofel is now known as Guest73835
=== ashams is now known as Guest59050
alo21cyphermox, hi, xcan I ask a thing?06:21
=== hyperair is now known as Guest11665
=== [ESphynx] is now known as ESphynx
=== elky is now known as Guest36440
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
alo21hi all11:31
alo21when I run 'grab-merge blueman', the script downloads the wrond debian traball11:32
alo21have to download all manually?11:32
alo21#ubuntu-web11:58
alo21I have to report a bug related to https://merges.ubuntu.com/11:59
alo21where should I write?12:00
RhondaMay I upload for bug 1074845 already, or shall I wait for some ACK from the sru team?413:09
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1074845 in monkeystudio (Ubuntu Quantal) "monkeystudio crashes while displaying menu tooltips" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/107484513:09
=== Guest73835 is now known as yofel
jtaylorRhonda: just upload, sru will acc (or nack) the upload in the queue13:56
RhondaAh, great.14:05
jtaylorRhonda: it needs to be fixed in raring first14:12
jtaylorit probably is according to the changelog, but you should mark the bug fix released so sru knows14:13
alo21can someone help me, please?14:15
alo21grab-manager donwloads the wrong tarball14:18
alo21because there are the wrong file here https://merges.ubuntu.com/b/blueman/14:19
alo21what should I do?14:19
=== Guest36440 is now known as elky
=== elky is now known as Guest58900
Rhondajtaylor: According to Zhenech it is already fixed in raring?14:29
jtaylorRhonda: the changelog implies it, but the bug not14:29
jtayloralo21: what doe grab-merges load?14:30
RhondaThanks for the hint, set to "Fix released"14:30
alo21jtaylor: all the package which are there14:31
alo21packages*14:31
jtaylorall?14:31
alo21jtaylor: not just the first three. In fact they should be at version 1.23-1 (http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/blueman/current/changelog), and not 1.22~bzr707-114:32
jtayloralo21: that may be the merge base14:44
jtayloralo21: yes its working correctly14:46
jtayloralo21: for a merge you need three things, the base and the two branches14:46
alo21jtaylor: oh.. I've never noticed it, even if I have done a merge yet. I thought that there was a mistake just because someone wrote a comment in mom14:49
alo21jtaylor: thank you very much for you time, and I'm really sorry14:50
alo21jtaylor: can I ask you a thing?15:18
alo21arand: can I ask you a thing?15:21
jtayloralo21: yes?15:22
alo21jtaylor: I have a patch which was applied in the old ubuntu package15:23
alo21now I would like to merge the package with the new one (from debian)15:23
alo21the bedian version has a loto fo change and the ptch cannot be applied correctly, because the line number are different15:25
alo21jtaylor: have to edit the patch to be applied correctly on the new version?15:25
jtayloryes15:25
jtaylorusing bzr or some version control usually helps15:26
jtaylorvcs have lots of tools to do merging15:26
alo21jtaylor: I don't understand why the merge does not reuards all the files15:43
jtaylor?15:44
alo21jtaylor: there are a lot of fils where are shown the difference between debian and ubuntu (e.g. "<<<<<<< blueman-1.23-0ubuntu3 (ubuntu)" ... ">>>>>>> blueman-1.23-1 (debian)")15:46
alo21files*15:46
jtaylorthat is is not unlikely in these cases15:46
jtaylorthe debian and ubuntu packages can be completely different15:47
jtaylorits not a good situation and should be resolved15:47
jtaylorpreferably by being mire similar to debian15:47
jtaylorbut that depends on who did the ubuntu changes15:47
alo21jtaylor: when I try to build the package, I got this error "dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source --commit dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see /tmp/blueman_1.23-1ubuntu1.diff.O67jQ"15:49
alo21and this is the file http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1385498/15:49
jtaylorif that is the merge diff that does not look like a good package to learn merging with15:50
jtaylorthe dpkg-source error basically means you have changed something directly without a patch15:51
jtaylorput the change in a patch to fix it15:51
jtaylorif its a valid change15:51
alo21I have changed just the changelog, and there are two old patches15:52
mitya57looks like the version number in d/changelog doesn't match the tarball version...15:52
mitya57and also you haven't resolved all conflicts15:53
mitya57+<<<<<<< blueman-1.23-0ubuntu3 (ubuntu)15:53
alo21mitya57: in which file?15:53
mitya57configure15:54
mitya57lines 41–50 of the diff15:54
jtayloralo21: if you really want to do it it might be better to take the debian package and patch in from ubuntu what is worth keeping15:54
* jtaylor didn'T actually look at the package yet15:55
mitya57I personally use this workflow:15:55
mitya57  bzr branch debianlp:packagename15:56
mitya57  cd packagename15:56
mitya57  bzr merge ubuntu:packagename15:56
mitya57and then resolving the conflicts (if any)15:56
alo21mitya57: does this another way to make a merge (without grab-merge)?15:57
jtayloryes, it has the advantage that you have the vcs merging tools available15:59
mitya57alo21: yes, I think it's called "udd-merging"15:59
mitya57http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/udd-merging.html (though that page will be deleted tomorrow)15:59
mitya57sorry, not that one, that will be kept :)16:00
alo21mitya57: I've done what you told me, and there are 53 conflicts16:01
mitya57let me look16:02
jtayloras mentioned this might really be a too hard package16:02
jtaylorand the simple cherry picking approach may be more feasable16:02
jtaylorafk a while16:02
alo21mitya57: should I resolve that conflicts by my hand?16:03
mitya57alo21: looks like orig tarballs are different :(16:05
mitya571b54374c694e800d6280c9aabce12c9a vs f0bee59589f4c23e35bf08c2ef8acaef16:05
mitya57ubuntu's looks better16:06
mitya57I would suggest you to manually pick changes from debian16:07
alo21mitya57: what do you mean manyally?16:12
alo21manually*16:12
mitya57ah, that has already been done: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/1.23-0ubuntu216:13
mitya57think that that package is up-to-date with debian :)16:13
mitya57the only thing that ubuntu packaging is missing is:16:15
mitya57* Added dependency for gnome-icon-theme (Closes: #631838)16:15
mitya57debian bug 63183816:15
ubottuDebian bug 631838 in blueman "Missing icon/image renders software unusable" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/63183816:15
alo21mitya57: mm... but manually, you mean find all the conflicts and edit them with gedit. Right?16:16
mitya57alo21: no I don't mean that16:17
mitya57the package is already in good shape, you shouldn't do any merges16:17
mitya57but you may want to add gnome-icon-theme to Depends: field in d/control16:18
alo21mitya57: if just 2 bugs were fixed, why there are different orig?16:19
mitya57alo21: I don't know that, either upstream changed their tarball or debian used the wrong one16:20
mitya57I have to leave now, sorry...16:21
=== imbrando1 is now known as imbrandon
=== chilicuil is now known as chilicuil_away
TheMusoalo21: Just ask your question, you need not ask me whether you can ask.21:10
=== Guest58900 is now known as elky

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!