| Logan_ | Can any UDDers please perform this? $ requeue_package.py --full initramfs-tools | 05:36 |
|---|---|---|
| bob2 | don't you want #launchpad instead? | 05:36 |
| Logan_ | Someone recommended that I go here for this request. | 05:36 |
| Logan_ | jam, maybe? | 05:38 |
| Logan_ | Or lifeless? | 05:39 |
| jam | Logan_: lifeless is no longer @canonical, but I'll look into it. One moment. | 05:39 |
| Logan_ | Alright, thanks. :) | 05:39 |
| Logan_ | I'm requesting it based on http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/ and the linked https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/714622 , which recommends running that command for packages that encounter that bzr failure. It has worked in the past. | 05:40 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 714622 in Ubuntu Distributed Development "import fails when lp branch has been push --overwrite'n" [High,Confirmed] | 05:40 |
| jam | Logan_: I have requeued your package. | 05:43 |
| Logan_ | Awesome, thanks jam. :) | 05:44 |
| gour | morning | 08:40 |
| gour | i've a need to use svn to contribute to some open-source project, so wonder how does bzr-svn compare with hg & git's options? | 08:42 |
| gour | otoh, it's sad to see bzr development stalled :-( | 08:42 |
| lifeless | bzr-svn is pretty good | 08:45 |
| mgz | mornin' | 09:09 |
| jam | morning mgz | 09:10 |
| gour | lifeless: what's going to happen with bzr? | 09:10 |
| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk | ||
| === mmrazik|afk is now known as mmrazik | ||
| === lamont` is now known as lamont | ||
| mathrick | hiya | 13:31 |
| mathrick | so what exactly is the difference between development-colo and bzr-colo, and how am I supposed to use the former? | 13:32 |
| jiku | hello All.. | 13:42 |
| jiku | im pretty new to bazaar and would like to implement it in my workplace.. | 13:42 |
| jiku | bzr-explorer is good and would like to master it so that i can talk to developers on how to use it and create a workflow. | 13:43 |
| jiku | 1 issue im facing is.. | 13:43 |
| jiku | i have a revision in the server with name, think-blog.. | 13:43 |
| jiku | i checkout in a client (win7) machine with bzr-explorer installed. | 13:43 |
| jiku | it asks for sftp password when doing checkout which is normal. | 13:43 |
| jiku | once i download, if im not wrong, the revision with its history is saved in the client.. | 13:44 |
| jiku | but here whenever i open bazaar explorer and open that working tree, it asks for passwords.. when i do a diff, it asks for passwrods.. | 13:44 |
| jiku | why is it still dependent on the server which actually should be doing everything from the local perspective ? | 13:44 |
| jiku | any ideas ? | 13:44 |
| jiku | or is it that im doing it wrong ? | 13:45 |
| jiku | hi,.. anybody ? | 13:49 |
| mgz | jiku: you don't want a lightweight checkout, you want to make a proper branch | 14:03 |
| jiku | mgz, oh.. ok... | 14:04 |
| jiku | i was doing that by default.. | 14:04 |
| jiku | let me try again. | 14:04 |
| mgz | you then also may want to put the passwords in your authentications.conf file, see `bzr help authentication` | 14:04 |
| jiku | ok.. | 14:05 |
| jiku | let me try this.. | 14:05 |
| mgz | or, use an agent so you don't type the password each time but use a public key instea | 14:05 |
| mgz | d | 14:05 |
| mgz | mathrick: you don't want to use development-colo, but you can use the builtin colo support in 2.6, it's just a little less polished than the bzr-colo plugin | 14:06 |
| jiku | mgz, hmm.. | 14:09 |
| jiku | looks like, whenever i do a checkout using explorer, it does with --lightweight enabled. | 14:09 |
| mgz | you don't want to do checkout | 14:09 |
| mgz | you want a branch | 14:09 |
| mgz | (I suspect) | 14:09 |
| mgz | if you have options over workflows, you really don't want to emulate the centralised server thing of svn etc | 14:10 |
| jiku | mgz, true.. yes.. | 14:10 |
| jiku | mgz, was confused with git (never used but just read).. there you checkout and branch.. (if im not wrong) | 14:11 |
| mgz | depends what you think you can get everyone else to use, but having a full branch locally, and working with trunk+merge is how to get the main benefit of dvcs | 14:11 |
| jiku | yes.. right.. this is what we need actually.. there shouldn't be a centralized locking.. | 14:12 |
| mgz | in git, saying 'checkout' means get me all the history, and branch just... prints the branch name or something | 14:12 |
| mathrick | mgz: right, but still, how do I use it? I don't see much explaining how to do it | 14:12 |
| mgz | mathrick: basically, you just create a new standalone branch, do `bzr switch -b trunk` or whatever to name the default branch | 14:13 |
| mathrick | ah | 14:13 |
| mgz | then you can do `bzr switch -b feature` to create a feature branch | 14:13 |
| mgz | `bzr switch trunk` to go back to trunk | 14:14 |
| mathrick | and what about cloning, will it carry over all branches? | 14:14 |
| mgz | the main missing thing is a nice addressing scheme for colocated branches outside of a few commands | 14:14 |
| mathrick | I see an open bug about it, so I guess not? | 14:14 |
| mgz | right, it doesn't, though there's a workaround of some kind I think | 14:14 |
| mathrick | what'd that be? | 14:15 |
| mgz | not sure, but it's reasonably trivial to iterate over local branches and push them all up, there's a plugin that does something like that for shared repos | 14:16 |
| mathrick | this was what I hoped most for, along with fixing the fact that bzr-colo refers to branches with absolute paths, which breaks alternative approaches of just sharing the same workspace dir amongst many machines | 14:16 |
| mathrick | mgz: well, yes, but it needs thinking on my part and remembering to do it. As much as I think git's model is stupid, the fact that fetch carries over everything is a boon | 14:17 |
| mathrick | not just my part, but everyone I talk to | 14:17 |
| mathrick | which is a bigger problem really | 14:17 |
| mathrick | mgz: does 2.6 need anything in the way of the branch format to support colocated branches? | 14:18 |
| mgz | nope, that's all done | 14:18 |
| mathrick | so just 2a? | 14:18 |
| mgz | it's just making it all pretty to use that's unfinished | 14:18 |
| mathrick | mhm | 14:19 |
| mgz | I'm using it for one project currently as an experiment | 14:20 |
| mgz | apart from some confusion setting up, and needing to know to type file:,branch=FEATURE in a few circumstances, I've not had any issues | 14:20 |
| mgz | that said, I've not wanted to push all branches, push has been specifically for updating remote trunk after feature branch merge | 14:21 |
| Logan_ | jam: Can you please do < requeue_package.py --full iscsitarget > when you get the chance? Thanks so much! | 16:41 |
| Logan_ | (Or any other UDDer, for that matter.) | 16:41 |
| mgz | warum? | 16:44 |
| mgz | I can do this... well, I could look at the package log as well, but would prefer to not take 15 minutes looking at it first. | 16:46 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === _thumper_ is now known as thumper | ||
| === ccxCZ_ is now known as ccxCZ | ||
| === Enlik is now known as Guest98527 | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| === Guest98527 is now known as Enlik|meh | ||
| === bradm_ is now known as bradm | ||
| nDuff | Is shelve expected to work with bzr-svn? I'm getting "NotImplementedError: <bound method SvnBasisTree.path_content_summary of <SvnBasisTree for '<SvnWorkingTree of /home/cduffy/VC/boundsetter>'>>" | 22:51 |
| jelmer | nDuff: no, I don't think it works with bzr-svn | 22:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!