| === JoseeAntonioR is now known as Guest41415 | ||
| === Guest41415 is now known as JoseeAntonioR | ||
| === fenris is now known as Guest69384 | ||
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| === lhavelund is now known as MenZa | ||
| === MenZa is now known as lhavelund | ||
| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk | ||
| === cking_ is now known as cking | ||
| === mmrazik|afk is now known as mmrazik | ||
| === ogra-cb__ is now known as ogra-cb | ||
| === lamont` is now known as lamont | ||
| === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch | ||
| === lan3y is now known as Laney | ||
| === davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === Myrtti_ is now known as Myrtti | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === smoser` is now known as smoser | ||
| === LordOfTime is now known as TheLordOfTime | ||
| jdstrand | hi! | 18:04 |
|---|---|---|
| tyhicks | Hello | 18:04 |
| sarnold | hello | 18:04 |
| jdstrand | #startmeeting | 18:04 |
| meetingology | Meeting started Mon Nov 26 18:04:33 2012 UTC. The chair is jdstrand. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 18:04 |
| meetingology | Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired | 18:04 |
| jdstrand | The meeting agenda can be found at: | 18:04 |
| jdstrand | [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting | 18:04 |
| jdstrand | [TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report | 18:04 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Weekly stand-up report | ||
| jdstrand | I'll go first | 18:04 |
| jdstrand | I'm on community this week. thanks mdeslaur for covering for my at the end of last week | 18:05 |
| mdeslaur | np, yw | 18:05 |
| jdstrand | I have a lynx-cur update I hope to push out this week and an embargoed issue | 18:05 |
| jdstrand | I also should be finishing my secure boot db/dbx updates package and work items for secure boot this week | 18:06 |
| jdstrand | I have patch piloting duties as well | 18:06 |
| jdstrand | there are also some MIR audits to attend to. I'll probably pull in sarnold to help with some of those as well | 18:06 |
| jdstrand | mdeslaur: you're up | 18:06 |
| mdeslaur | I'm in the happy place this week | 18:07 |
| mdeslaur | I'm currently publishing libssh updates | 18:07 |
| mdeslaur | and will continue going down the never-ending CVE list | 18:07 |
| mdeslaur | that's about it from me | 18:07 |
| mdeslaur | sbeattie: you're up | 18:07 |
| jdstrand | we're like the postoffice | 18:07 |
| mdeslaur | yes, hopefully with less automatic weapons | 18:07 |
| jdstrand | that said, we are in really good shape lately | 18:07 |
| sbeattie | I'm once again an apparmor monkey boy this week | 18:08 |
| jdstrand | better than we've been in a long time | 18:08 |
| sbeattie | heh | 18:08 |
| sbeattie | I'm still working on getting the prototype display manager patch into a state where we can start to play with it, and see what mediation abstractions fall out of it. | 18:09 |
| sbeattie | I'm also still trying to review jjohansen's patch bombs as well as clear out other miscellaneous apparmor stuff. | 18:09 |
| sbeattie | that's it for me. | 18:09 |
| sbeattie | micahg: you're up. | 18:09 |
| micahg | trying to drive the webkit stable update to completion and trying to get some fresh chromium updates as well | 18:10 |
| micahg | will also be keeping an eye out for mozilla point releases if they come along | 18:11 |
| micahg | tyhicks: you're up | 18:11 |
| tyhicks | I'm wrapping up my work for the ecryptfs-utils SRU this morning | 18:12 |
| tyhicks | Then I'll be looking at the dbus patches for apparmor to determine why I'm not able to mediate messages | 18:12 |
| tyhicks | Then, I'll be working more on the dbus prototype | 18:13 |
| tyhicks | That's it | 18:13 |
| tyhicks | jjohansen: you're up | 18:13 |
| jjohansen | I will be fixing a couple known bugs in last weeks apparmor patch bomb, and finishing up the changes to the base labeling patches so I can drop another patch bomb this week | 18:13 |
| jjohansen | I think that is it from /me sarnold your up | 18:14 |
| sarnold | I'm still working on the perl updates; the old packaging system and I didn't get along very well, but I think we've come to an understanding. | 18:14 |
| sarnold | I've written tests for three of the CVEs in qrt; I want to take another look at them today and make sure they look reasonable before pushing | 18:15 |
| mdeslaur | sarnold: have you agreed to disagree? | 18:15 |
| sarnold | mdeslaur: yes. | 18:15 |
| mdeslaur | hehe | 18:15 |
| sarnold | mdeslaur: and we're hoping that hardy and lucid go EOL before another perl update. :) | 18:15 |
| mdeslaur | hehe :) | 18:16 |
| sarnold | .. but since that never quite happens, I'll try to write up some notes on what I found, so the next time I need it, they'll be there. | 18:16 |
| sarnold | I've also got to take a closer look at some qemu patches hallyn asked for our review of... | 18:17 |
| sarnold | .. and doko asked us to investigate some issues, I'll find out their status | 18:17 |
| sarnold | s/issues/gcc issues/ | 18:17 |
| mdeslaur | sarnold: ok, you can put your notes in $qrt/build_testing | 18:17 |
| sarnold | mdeslaur: hrm, I thought there was a different path for the patching-and-building notes... | 18:18 |
| jdstrand | (or notes_testing/ - the distinction has grown extremely blurry-- we might consider merging them) | 18:18 |
| mdeslaur | yeah, I'm always confused which is which | 18:19 |
| jdstrand | traditionally build_testing/ has been notes on how to get you results/ | 18:19 |
| jdstrand | whereas notes_testing/ is the catch-all. I've probably not followed that myself-- it is a very fine hair | 18:19 |
| sarnold | uhoh, we lost the meeting bot. | 18:19 |
| jdstrand | anyhoo | 18:20 |
| sarnold | I think that's it for me, jdstrand? | 18:20 |
| jdstrand | sarnold: did you have anything else to report? | 18:20 |
| jdstrand | cool | 18:20 |
| jdstrand | [TOPIC] Highlighted packages | 18:20 |
| jdstrand | The Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so. | 18:20 |
| jdstrand | See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved. | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/mahara.html | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/osc.html | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/libsmi.html | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/icecast2.html | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/wv2.html | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | [TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | Does anyone have any other questions or items to discuss? | 18:21 |
| jdstrand | #endmeeting | 18:29 |
| jdstrand | mdeslaur, sbeattie, micahg, tyhicks, jjohansen, sarnold: thanks! | 18:29 |
| jjohansen | thanks jdstrand | 18:29 |
| sarnold | thanks jdstrand :) | 18:30 |
| micahg | jdstrand: thanks | 18:30 |
| mdeslaur | thanks jdstrand! | 18:31 |
| sbeattie | jdstrand: thanks! | 18:31 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === LordOfTime is now known as TheLordOfTime | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| pitti | hello | 21:00 |
| pitti | cjwatson, kees, soren, stgraber, mdz: TB meeting? | 21:01 |
| cjwatson | Here | 21:02 |
| cjwatson | We had an empty agenda when I looked earlier today, though | 21:02 |
| pitti | yeah, the only thing that catches my eye is the brainstorm review | 21:02 |
| pitti | nothing techboard-ish in my mailbox apparently | 21:03 |
| * stgraber waves | 21:03 | |
| pitti | so for the brainstorm review, do you guys have some opinion whether we should continue this? | 21:05 |
| pitti | from the last cycles that we actually did do, I found it moderately helpful | 21:05 |
| mdz | pitti, hi | 21:05 |
| cjwatson | Well, I still think it's a good thing for us to do, but it's beginning to seem like a lost cause | 21:05 |
| pitti | but it seems to help less and less, with design being more institutionalized | 21:05 |
| mdz | I (still) think it is better to discontinue it explicitly than to allow it to be in limbo like this | 21:05 |
| pitti | I volunteer for doing this round, if we want to try another one | 21:06 |
| pitti | I think the last one was kind of started, but then just silently died | 21:06 |
| cjwatson | Mm, I found the non-design bits of the review I did more productive than the design bits | 21:06 |
| pitti | right, the part that I found useful was the reality check | 21:07 |
| pitti | in my last round I found that the majority of cases that users voted up were actually being handled already, but there were some gems which warranted a closer look | 21:07 |
| pitti | so, unless you guys have a strong opinion to close the lid on that one (doesn't seem so), I'll just have a go at it? | 21:08 |
| * soren wanders in | 21:08 | |
| cjwatson | I don't see why you shouldn't have a go at it if you're keen | 21:09 |
| pitti | ok, I'll add it as an action item them | 21:09 |
| cjwatson | But on the principle of setting achievable targets, it doesn't seem that it's a sensible thing for the TB to set itself, given that we generally seem to fail at it | 21:09 |
| soren | pitti: I found it extremely difficult to figure out who I should assign each of the items to. Perhaps you, being more in touch with things than I, will do a better job. | 21:10 |
| pitti | soren: I was mostly asking appropriate people and TLs on IRC back then | 21:11 |
| soren | That's the thing. I hardly even know who the TLs and "appropriate people" are these days. | 21:11 |
| pitti | of course I know the desktop guys, but e. g. for server and kernel I asked Daviey and ogasawara about "who would be suitable to have a look at this" | 21:11 |
| cjwatson | Is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Teams not up to date? | 21:12 |
| pitti | right, so maybe I'll have more luck; still depends on people actually responding | 21:12 |
| soren | cjwatson: Gosh. I didn't even know about that page :( | 21:12 |
| cjwatson | It's the third link in the body text off the front page :) | 21:12 |
| cjwatson | Mind you OMG horrible colours | 21:12 |
| cjwatson | (Can anyone actually read the contents of the "Team Name" column?) | 21:12 |
| pitti | the shape looks quite LCARish, just wrong colors | 21:13 |
| pitti | yeah, I can read it well, but it doesn't look that good | 21:13 |
| soren | cjwatson: Yeah, it's not too bad for me. | 21:13 |
| soren | cjwatson: Could be better for sure, but it's readable. | 21:13 |
| cjwatson | pitti: LCAR> I had to look that up :) | 21:13 |
| pitti | anyway, there are 0 community bugs and (from what I can see) zero pending ML issues, so that's it? | 21:13 |
| pitti | cjwatson: LCARS, sorry | 21:13 |
| pitti | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoardAgenda updated for next meeting and that action item | 21:16 |
| pitti | cjwatson, soren, mdz, stgraber: anything else from you? | 21:16 |
| cjwatson | I have nothing else | 21:17 |
| soren | Nope. | 21:17 |
| pitti | then good night everyone! | 21:17 |
| stgraber | nope | 21:18 |
| soren | o/ | 21:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!