[00:02] <TheLordOfTime> sorta
[00:02] <TheLordOfTime> but there is no PPA address for that
[00:02] <TheLordOfTime> you're referencing the Lucid repositories directly
[00:02] <TheLordOfTime> and sun-java6-jre won't be in ANY PPA last i checked due to the change in licensing for it
[00:03] <TheLordOfTime> (by Oracle)
[00:03] <Sebo> So how can I add this repository to my ubuntu sources.list
[00:03] <TheLordOfTime> what version of Ubuntu are you on?
[00:03] <Sebo> 10.04.4 LTS
[00:04] <TheLordOfTime> Sebo, you already have that repository then.
[00:05] <Sebo> I might have not cause I've got corporation customised ubuntu...
[00:05] <TheLordOfTime> pastebin your sources.list then
[00:06] <Sebo> My /etc/apt/sources.list is empty (except some comment lines)
[00:07] <Sebo> And I can pastebin the cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
[00:13] <TheLordOfTime> you may want to do that
[00:13] <TheLordOfTime> because if you have nothing in your sources.list, well...
[00:13] <TheLordOfTime> something's not right there :p
[00:17] <bigjools> well don't publicly paste it
[00:17] <Sebo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1390510/
[00:17] <bigjools> it might have passwords in it
[00:18] <Sebo> There is no passwords there and I've cutted off our internal domain names
[00:21] <ajmitch> fwiw, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-security-announce/2012-January/001554.html
[00:22] <TheLordOfTime> ah i see what's happening there...
[00:22] <ajmitch> that was the reason for deletion from lucid
[00:22] <TheLordOfTime> yep that.
[00:23] <TheLordOfTime> does webupd8 team still maintain java 6/7 for lucid?  i know they had a script that downloaded the data from oracle itself, and didnt contain any actual java code/programs.
[00:23] <TheLordOfTime> answered my own question!
[00:24] <TheLordOfTime> Sebo, use this PPA if you need Sun / Oracle Java:  https://launchpad.net/~webupd8team/+archive/java/
[00:24] <TheLordOfTime> it installs the JDK, but that's about the closest you'll get to just the JRE in an easy-to-install setup.
[00:25] <Sebo> Thix I think that's it... :)
[00:26] <Sebo> I need jre from oracle cause the open one is not compatible with frost :p
[00:26] <TheLordOfTime> the JDK has a JRE
[00:26] <TheLordOfTime> it should work :p
[00:27] <ScottK> Sebo: You need to talk to Oracle then.
[00:29] <Sebo> To complayn them abut the pess which was caused by their non acceptance of the licence... cause I do not think I need to touch them just to use theirs jre... at least for @ windows I did not had to so why should I for @ Linux.
[01:59] <ScottK> Nothing we can do about the license.  They're now distributing it under terms that make it not suitable for inclusion in Linux distros.
[02:12] <bigjools> ScottK: I consider that a good thing :)
[02:14] <lifeless> license of ?
[02:17] <bigjools> java
[02:24] <lifeless> ah
[02:26] <ScottK> bigjools: No argument from me.
[11:54] <YoBoY> hi
[13:15] <YoBoY> a tricky question : I'm trying to understand where is the best place to fix a translation problem. The source file is in Latex, the tool to translate is Launchpad, the destination langage is french, and the problem is with the [nbsp]. In Launchpad, we use [nbsp] for non breaking spaces, but it translates them into real " " in the .po and not the LaTeX code "~". Latex have wondefull paquages to help with langages and this causes in some parts a double
[13:15] <YoBoY> no break space. I don't know where to fix this problem, in Launchpad ? in po4a ? in Latex package ? in our french translators recomandations ? Any Idea ?
[13:15] <czajkowski> YoBoY: unsure and jtv isn't here to ask
[13:16] <czajkowski> YoBoY: mind mailing lp users and see if we can get a reply there ?
[13:16] <YoBoY> sure :)
[13:17] <YoBoY> it's launchpad-users@lists… ?
[13:18] <czajkowski> launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net
[13:18] <czajkowski> https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users
[13:18] <czajkowski> <-- lunch
[13:18] <YoBoY> bon appétit :)
[15:05] <pfefferz> hello everyone
[15:12] <TheLordOfTime> hiya
[16:02] <pfefferz> deryck, danilos suggested I ask you about how to remove someone from a BPs subscriber list
[16:04] <deryck> pfefferz: if you have the appropriate permission, you should be able to click the red minus sign icon and remove them.
[16:05] <pfefferz> okay, what permission do I need for that?
[16:05] <pfefferz> deryck, I'm already an admin
[16:07] <deryck> pfefferz: by permission, I just meant being able to see proprietary or embargoed blueprints. in other words, if you can add someone to a blueprint, you should be able to unsubscribe them.
[16:07] <pfefferz> deryck, :)
[16:10] <pfefferz> deryck, okay cool. Not sure if I missed the minus last time or if it wasn't there. Anyhow, it looks good now
[16:11] <deryck> pfefferz: excellent.
[16:11] <pfefferz> deryck, thanks for the help
[16:12] <deryck> pfefferz: np.
[16:27] <therve> hi!
[16:27] <therve> I have a problem with subscribing a team to bugs, I wonder if someone had an idea
[16:44] <ricotz> hello :), i am curious what are prerequisites to have armhf build support for a ppa?
[16:46] <ricotz> czajkowski, hello :) ^
[16:47] <czajkowski> <--- on a cal
[16:48] <mgz> ricotz: well, employment by canonical or linaro for starts
[16:48] <mgz> we don't have good answers for other people who want to to arm builds
[16:49] <ricotz> mgz, hi, i see, having arm build for elementaryOS wouldn't fit that then
[16:50] <ricotz> mgz, jfyi, the concerning ppa would be https://launchpad.net/~elementary-os/+archive/daily containing daily recipe builds
[16:54] <czajkowski> ricotz: hi as mgz points out, we only have those build for canonical and linaro at present
[16:59] <ricotz> czajkowski, thanks, i feared that answer ;)
[17:03] <flacoste> mgz, ricotz: that's not true since we virtualized ARM builders
[17:03] <mgz> ah, so how do we go about giving out arm perms these days flacoste?
[17:04] <flacoste> to date, we only enabled it for people with commercial subscription
[17:04] <ricotz> flacoste, oh, so there is a chance
[17:04] <flacoste> that's the first request from an open-source project
[17:04] <czajkowski> flacoste: ah the other categroy also.
[17:04] <flacoste> i'll have to investigate the impact though
[17:05] <czajkowski> flacoste: we get regular requests for it also not just this
[17:06] <flacoste> czajkowski, ricotz: i'll research this and come back with an official policy :-)
[17:06] <ricotz> flacoste, thank you!
[17:06] <czajkowski> flacoste: thanks,  for reference we get about 2-3 a week
[17:06] <flacoste> czajkowski: people who want armhf builds on their PPA?
[17:07] <ricotz> flacoste, it would also be possible to use a more restricted ppa do avoid flooding the arm builders with daily builds
[17:07] <flacoste> ricotz: these are 386 boxes really
[17:07] <czajkowski> flacoste: yes. we get asked a lot about this.
[17:08] <ricotz> flacoste, ok, just saying it is reasonable to reduce the builds to avoid flooding the builders
[19:09] <soren> Hi.
[19:09] <soren> I need to take control of a launchpad project registered by a former employee. Can anyone help me with that?
[19:20] <soren> Filed a question: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/215415
[23:15] <SpamapS> when using login.launchpad.net for OpenID ..is there a restriction on querying peoples' membership in a private team?
[23:26] <lifeless> yes
[23:27] <lifeless> you need a bit set, as the openid extra-data query is itself not authenticated
[23:27] <lifeless> so only trusted rp's can be allowed to query private teams
[23:27] <SpamapS> makes sense
[23:27] <SpamapS> I figured as much.
[23:27] <lifeless> this is one of the reasons ISD and LP both want to stop offering team data via openid
[23:27] <lifeless> instead, use openid for authentication and LP directly for authorisation
[23:27] <SpamapS> but its so useful!
[23:28] <lifeless> the functionality is
[23:28] <lifeless> the conflation of AA->A isn't