| pmatulis | thanks | 01:36 |
|---|---|---|
| aarcane | xnox, so getting partman-zfs is a definite no-go, and removing partman.py(c) seems to have resulted in the installer just not doing anything. | 05:23 |
| aarcane | in fact, xnox, insofar as I can tell, the installer, with ubi-partman.py{,c} removed has not so much as attempted to create a single file in /target/ ... | 06:15 |
| xnox | aarcane: explain why is partman-zfs is "no-go" | 09:26 |
| xnox | ? | 09:26 |
| xnox | aarcane: do you not provide the same zfs utility as used in the partman-zfs with same syntax? | 09:28 |
| ogra_ | xnox, wrent there licensing issues ? | 11:00 |
| xnox | ogra_: there is no license issue with partman-zfs calling a command line utility zfs, regardless of how said utility is licensed. | 11:01 |
| ogra_ | ah, i thought it ships something thats badly licensed, if its only wrapping around it thats surely no issue indeed | 11:02 |
| xnox | aarcane: alternatively use live-build & use oem-config. | 11:02 |
| xnox | ogra_: partman-zfs is all good & uses zfs utility on kfreebsd kernel / debian port. | 11:03 |
| ogra_ | ah, k | 11:03 |
| aarcane | xnox, I don't know enough about packaging to be able to install or package partman-zfs, and I'm not running on a platform where it's available. | 19:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!