[01:36] <pmatulis> thanks
[05:23] <aarcane> xnox, so getting partman-zfs is a definite no-go, and removing partman.py(c) seems to have resulted in the installer just not doing anything.
[06:15] <aarcane> in fact, xnox, insofar as I can tell, the installer, with ubi-partman.py{,c} removed has not so much as attempted to create a single file in /target/ ...
[09:26] <xnox> aarcane: explain why is partman-zfs is "no-go"
[09:26] <xnox> ?
[09:28] <xnox> aarcane: do you not provide the same zfs utility as used in the partman-zfs with same syntax?
[11:00] <ogra_> xnox, wrent there licensing issues ?
[11:01] <xnox> ogra_: there is no license issue with partman-zfs calling a command line utility zfs, regardless of how said utility is licensed.
[11:02] <ogra_> ah, i thought it ships something thats badly licensed, if its only wrapping around it thats surely no issue indeed
[11:02] <xnox> aarcane: alternatively use live-build & use oem-config.
[11:03] <xnox> ogra_: partman-zfs is all good & uses zfs utility on kfreebsd kernel / debian port.
[11:03] <ogra_> ah, k
[19:26] <aarcane> xnox, I don't know enough about packaging to be able to install or package partman-zfs, and I'm not running on a platform where it's available.