/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/11/28/#launchpad.txt

=== jrgifford is now known as Guest87195
DNShi:) can some1 please check whats wrong with that import → https://code.launchpad.net/~rbose-vcs-imports/emacs/trunk i can not see any error in the log or what could be wrong03:26
wgrantDNS: There's nothing wrong03:31
wgrantIt's just importing gradually, 30000 revisions at a time03:31
wgrantRather than trying to convert potentially hundreds of thousands or millions of revisions at once03:31
DNSbut there are no files after "job is finished"?03:32
wgrantThey'll be available after the initial import is done, once the jobs start finishing completely (a green tick, rather than a grey partial success)03:34
DNSah i think i understand now:)03:36
DNSwgrant: thx for the info03:39
wgrantnp03:39
DNSwgrant: btw i filed a bug about 2 weeks ago not sure if you saw my reply: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1078172 the mc packages for example are from 2011-07-23, so i wonder if that is related to bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/107156203:42
StevenKIt takes two weeks for binaries to fully expire out03:44
DNSbut those are deleted in 2011?03:45
DNSand still shown?03:45
DNSi tried to delete them again thats why a new date is shown03:46
DNSok sorry im confused, it seems those files werent deleted in 2011 but should be more than 2 weeks ago now :x03:53
DNSand https://launchpad.net/~dns/+archive/sound/+delete-packages?field.name_filter=gmidi&field.status_filter=superseded&field.series_filter= says it had a "Removal requested on 2012-03-03." so i wonder a bit04:00
DNSwhy this is still shown04:00
wgrantDNS: Things will be shown there until their files are actually removed, which most often happens if there are binaries left over (in which case you'll need to redelete), or if the source is published in another series too04:13
DNSwgrant: ok, thx again for info :)04:21
ebergenhooray for the ability to change a username05:18
=== doko_ is now known as doko
profzoomI'm trying to request a merge of a branch.  The documentation says there should be a "Propose for merging into another branch" link on the branch page, but I can't find it anywhere.  Could anyone point me in the right direction?06:04
wgrantprofzoom: Which page are you looking at?06:06
profzoomhttps://code.launchpad.net/~profzoom/+junk/wmaker06:10
profzoomI'm trying to request that it be merged into the wmaker package06:10
wgrantprofzoom: Ah, +junk branches aren't related to a project or package, so you can't propose them for merging. You might want to push to eg. lp:~profzoom/ubuntu/quantal/wmaker/bug-1079925 instead.06:32
wgrantThat way it will be mergable into other wmaker branches06:32
=== Logan_ is now known as Guest76402
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark
shadeslayerwould it be possible for someone to rescore a small build for me? it's a 5 minute build and I'll have to wait an hour before it gets built10:07
shadeslayerkind of blocking my work :P10:07
shadeslayerhttps://launchpad.net/~netrunner-os/+archive/build/+build/401853810:08
czajkowskian hour isn't that bad compared to others.10:11
czajkowskibut will see10:11
shadeslayerczajkowski: thanks :)10:17
czajkowskiStevenK: could you help out please with this ppa increase10:21
czajkowskiI've tried to bump the score but nothing changed.10:21
StevenKIt didn't work, I've done so10:21
czajkowskiStevenK: cheers10:22
shadeslayerStevenK: czajkowski thanks alot!10:31
Laneyhttps://launchpadlibrarian.net/124313309/buildlog_ubuntu-raring-i386.libubuntuone_4.0.0-0ubuntu2%7Eubuntu13.04.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz12:18
Laneysad PPA buildd?12:18
geser"Unrecognized character \x06 at /home/buildd/.sbuildrc line 1." nice error12:30
=== Mkaysi_ is now known as Mkaysi
oerdnjhi, akhlut builds are broken, do you already know it or should I report it somewhere?14:33
oerdnjsays: Unrecognized character \x06 at /home/buildd/.sbuildrc line 1.14:37
czajkowskioerdnj: we know14:44
oerdnjczajkowski: ok, cool, goot to know. no need to report bug then... thanks for the answer14:44
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Known issues: Akhlut builders are offline. Help contact:- | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
vankoochHi, I've uploaded a package to launchpad… but I've problems.. to get it build there… it builds correct on i386 but does fail on amd64. Locally I only have a amd64, and it builds there without any problems on a clean vm and on my dev machine. A friend also tried to build it locally on his amd64 machine without any problems. All have been tested on 12.04. Can someone please help me?17:14
vankoochthat is the log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/124266893/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.yate_4.2.1-ubuntu1-sico1~precise_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz17:14
=== Sweetshark is now known as Sweetsharl
=== Sweetsharl is now known as Sweetshark
=== dpb_ is now known as Guest46508
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless
=== jrgifford is now known as Guest13203
=== firewire is now known as ebergen
xnoxlaunchpad has an interesting interpretation of release milestones22:46
xnoxhttps://launchpad.net/procenv/+series22:46
wgrantxnox: What do you mean? Those were manually created by the project maintainer22:48
xnoxwgrant: sure, but the ordering is intersting it's neither: numeric, alphabetic, chronological22:48
xnoxwgrant: on the graph.22:49
wgrantIt's going to be a little confused by the v being added in some of the milestone names22:49
wgrantI've never seen a project do that before22:49
xnoxwgrant: the latest releases for the trunk paragraph below is correct (reverse chronological?!)22:49
xnoxwgrant: sure. it's peculiar =) but the project is FTBFS across 12 architectures on debian and each 'release' tried to fix some of them to uncover more problems.22:50
wgrantSure, but that doesn't explain why the version scheme grew a 'v' at the start recently :)22:51
wgrantChanging that half way through is likely to confuse things, so I can't really blame LP for beings somewhat confused.22:51
xnoxwgrant: do you want this bug of questionable value, or will you remember this as an omg "funny things launchpad users do" =)))))22:57
wgrantWe have enough bugs already, but if you really want to file it you can22:57
wgrantI'd suggest just making the milestone naming consistent, though!22:57
maxbPerhaps the bug should be "LP should document how it handles milestone ordering on the milestone creation form"22:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!