[11:04] <diahane1> hello guys, take a look at http://bitfungus.org/ , if you can help is totally open source! sorry for my bad english :P
[11:05] <izidor> Hi, can anybody help me find out why this build failed?
[11:05] <izidor> https://launchpad.net/~gtg/+archive/gtg-daily/+recipebuild/354054
[11:05] <izidor> The log says that "dh" command could not be found... Similar recipe works... :/
[11:06] <czajkowski> izidor: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/124392667/buildlog.txt.gz
[11:06] <czajkowski> W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net oneiric Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B82A968F7AC9B38F
[11:06] <czajkowski> izidor: and lots more stuff at the end there
[11:06] <czajkowski> You have not informed bzr of your Launchpad ID, and you must do this to
[11:06] <czajkowski> write to Launchpad or access private data.  See "bzr help launchpad-login"
[11:07] <izidor> czajkowski: but this is a build on launchpad
[11:07] <izidor> czajkowski: how can I put there Launchpad ID?
[11:09] <geser> izidor: you want debhelper >= 9 but oneiric doesn't have debhelper 9
[11:11] <izidor> geser: okay, thank you
[12:16] <mgedmin> bzr branch lp:ubuntu/quantal/accountsservice
[12:16] <mgedmin> bzr: ERROR: Revision {package-import@ubuntu.com-20120327073153-fov4ysdud6fkkgw6} not present in "Graph(StackedParentsProvider(bzrlib.repository._LazyListJoin(([CachingParentsProvider(None)], []))))".
[12:17] <mgedmin> which means I'm stuck on step #1 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix
[13:02] <mgedmin> filed at https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1084522
[15:44] <dobey> are there any issues with armhf/armel builders currently?
[15:46] <czajkowski> dobey: none I've heard of what are you seeing/noticing
[15:47] <dobey> czajkowski: i have a few builds that have been stuck since tuesday it seems
[15:48] <czajkowski> dobey: can you point me at one in particular so I can poke sinzui or web ops
[15:49] <dobey> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuone/+archive/nightlies/+build/4016855
[15:54] <czajkowski> dobey: any more getting it poked
[15:55] <dobey> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuone/+archive/nightlies/+build/4017238
[15:55] <czajkowski> log says the buil is dead, it failed so needs to be stabbed
[15:55] <dobey> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuone/+archive/nightlies/+build/4017246
[15:55] <czajkowski> dobey: ok thanks
[15:55] <dobey> right; qemu seems to have some issues it seems
[16:00] <czajkowski> dobey: those builds have been reset
[16:02] <mgedmin> czajkowski, do you know who ought to be poked about bzr branches of ubuntu packages being inaccessible?  (http://pad.lv/1084522)
[16:02] <dobey> czajkowski: thanks
[16:03] <dobey> mgedmin: should generally be filed against UDD project I think
[16:04] <mgedmin> ah, so I've misfiled it?
[16:04] <mgz> that doesn't really resolve the "who" question :)
[16:05] <czajkowski> dobey: buildds or bug with qemu ?
[16:07] <dobey> czajkowski: well because the buildds use qemu, i guess. i've seen a lot of qemu weirdness with armel/armhf builds there, for the u1 packages
[16:08] <czajkowski> thedac: ^^^^
[16:09] <thedac> dobey: I guess my question is what action can be taken on that?
[16:10] <czajkowski> mgz: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1084522
[16:11] <dobey> thedac: i don't know. i guess if we could get a few of those nice big 192 core arm servers, that would be nice :)
[16:11] <thedac> heh
[16:11] <thedac> dobey: if you think of somehting file an RT or a bug
[16:12] <dobey> thedac: of course. thanks
[16:12] <czajkowski> dobey: or cake
[16:12] <czajkowski> cake seems to work also
[16:12] <dobey> yes, cake also works
[16:15] <czajkowski> micahg: lp didn't fail, have more coffeee :)
[16:15] <micahg> czajkowski: I think it did, there wasn't a previous version in the archive, yet a diff to one is provided
[16:15] <micahg> czajkowski: I should file a bug :)
[16:16] <czajkowski> please do :)
[16:16] <czajkowski> after you've had a coffee
[17:27]  * xnox thought malone serves coffee upon bug submission =)
[18:41] <ooguz>  /msg NickServ VERIFY REGISTER ooguz wsabetaequqx
[18:42] <lifeless> yeah, you're going to want to change that password now.
[18:43] <mapreri> a good alphabetical password, though
[19:04] <mark06> hi, I was testing the hide comment thing to see what it does exactly, but now I can't show the comment again anymore, the comment just disappeared, is this a bug?
[19:07] <czajkowski> micahg: no it's possible to unhinde
[19:07] <czajkowski> what i
[19:07] <czajkowski> bah
[19:07] <czajkowski> mark06: no it's possible
[19:07] <czajkowski> which bug
[19:08] <mark06> czajkowski: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-eclipse/+bug/428838
[19:09] <mark06> comments 4 and 5
[19:10] <czajkowski> fixed
[19:10] <czajkowski> please dont play with bugss :)
[19:11] <mark06> please write proper software
[19:13] <mark06> one that explains that hide actually deletes the comment, and one that won't make the dark-highlighted, "hidden" comment disappear together with the unhide option out of nothing, and so forth
[20:52] <mark06> thanks anyway
[21:46] <DNS> hm the emacs import has now "green arrows" but the files are still not imported, seems the progress keeps hanging https://code.launchpad.net/~rbose-vcs-imports/emacs/trunk
[21:58] <mwhudson> DNS: i see files at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rbose-vcs-imports/emacs/trunk/files
[22:05] <DNS> mwhudson: nice, i didnt recognize
[22:05] <DNS> just it still says "Updating branch" on the overview page, thats why i thought theres still nothing
[22:07] <DNS> (and no recent revisions to see)
[22:14] <dobey> the branch scanner probably got tripped up on it for some reason
[22:20] <DNS> i didnt know you give your machines drugs :o
[22:20] <DNS> jk
[22:22] <mwhudson> the scanner likes mescal, i hear