| === mspencer_ is now known as mdspencer | ||
| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
| === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === chilicuil_away is now known as chilicuil | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 08:00 |
|---|---|---|
| Rcart | good morning daniel o/ | 08:08 |
| dholbach | hi Rcart | 08:10 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| obounaim | Hello, | 10:42 |
| bdrung | dholbach: thanks for the "clearing the queue" mail. the only solution, i came up with, was to throw more people at the queue. | 11:27 |
| dholbach | yes | 11:27 |
| dholbach | I just had a look at ~10 entries in there | 11:27 |
| dholbach | if we all help out, and everybody with upload rights should, we'll get there | 11:28 |
| bdrung | dholbach: can we have a list of sponsor items associated with the last uploader? | 11:31 |
| bdrung | then we could poke people at looking at the sponsor request instead of just asking in general | 11:31 |
| dholbach | hum, I'm not quite sure what you'd like to do | 11:32 |
| bdrung | dholbach: https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/scheme2c/debian-merge/+merge/136770 -> is that done? if yes, why is it still in the queue? | 11:32 |
| dholbach | it's uploaded, but the merge has not happened in LP yet | 11:32 |
| bdrung | dholbach: can we get it technically out of the queue? maybe setting: in progress or checking -proposed? | 11:33 |
| bdrung | example for my idea: bug 1075994 -> package lvm2 -> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.02.95-5ubuntu1 -> last uploader: xnox | 11:34 |
| dholbach | bdrung, I don't know - I'll mark it as merged when it's merged in LP | 11:34 |
| dholbach | ah, no, that's not easy to be done :-/ | 11:35 |
| === lenios__ is now known as lenios | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| bdrung | dholbach: where should the uploaded branch pushed to? ubuntu:package? | 12:02 |
| dholbach | bdrung, I usually wait for LP to automatically merge it :) | 12:02 |
| dholbach | but yes | 12:03 |
| xnox | bdrung: hm? | 12:11 |
| xnox | bdrung: hmm that needs more work. Ok i'll get around to it. | 12:12 |
| bdrung | xnox: i gave dholbach an example how to poke people to do sponsoring (by determing the last uploader) | 12:17 |
| xnox | bdrung: very scientific =) | 12:17 |
| xnox | /msg bdrung shhhh don't give the secrets away to dholbach | 12:18 |
| * xnox whoops | 12:18 | |
| bdrung | xnox: but it seams to work (in this small case example) :D | 12:18 |
| bdrung | dholbach: btw, is logan ready for MOTU? | 12:28 |
| dholbach | bdrung, I just sent him a d-a-t mail about the same topic earlier today ;-) | 12:54 |
| dholbach | I believe he is | 12:54 |
| dholbach | I'll let you know about his reply | 12:55 |
| bdrung | dholbach: d-a-t? | 12:56 |
| dholbach | dev advisory team | 12:56 |
| === Zic is now known as Guest73291 | ||
| === dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
| === Guest73291 is now known as Zic | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === LordOfTime is now known as TheLordOfTime | ||
| === chilicuil is now known as chilicuil_away | ||
| === 20WABM4XS is now known as jussi | ||
| === jussi is now known as jussi01 | ||
| === jussi01 is now known as jussi | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| xnox | micahg: Laney: dholbach: bdrung: MOTU meeting in 10 minutes | 15:50 |
| Laney | holy | 15:50 |
| xnox | or so my calendar tells me =) | 15:50 |
| * xnox may or may not be even/odd week out of sync | 15:51 | |
| * Laney has no idea | 15:51 | |
| Laney | we missed loads | 15:51 |
| dholbach | let's do it in any case :) | 15:51 |
| xnox | will that be the first one in raring ? =) | 15:51 |
| Laney | sure | 15:51 |
| Laney | it's a good side activity while i'm breaking the archive | 15:52 |
| Laney | muhahaha | 15:52 |
| xnox | Laney: well we can agreed on what to break next ;-) | 15:52 |
| * tumbleweed adjurns to the pub, where I'll stick my nose into the meeting | 15:59 | |
| dholbach | shall we? | 16:00 |
| ScottK | Here or -meeting? | 16:00 |
| * Laney points over there | 16:01 | |
| dholbach | MOTU Meeting in #ubuntu-meeting | 16:01 |
| aboudreault | with dpkg-deb -I mypackage.deb. I see: Depends: ....., libproj0, | 16:04 |
| aboudreault | how can I get it to put libproj0 (>= 4.8) ? | 16:04 |
| aboudreault | I specified my version in the build-depends on my control... | 16:04 |
| TheLordOfTime | aboudreault, in the control file, under Depends, make sure it says libproj0 (>= 4.8) | 16:04 |
| aboudreault | well, we use: ${shlibs:Depends}, | 16:05 |
| aboudreault | I see a lot of other dep packages that are with their version number, why not libproj0? | 16:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | if you want it to define a specific minimum requirement for libproj0, add it yourself. | 16:05 |
| aboudreault | but why other packages are ok? ie. libgeos-c1 (>= 3.3.3) | 16:06 |
| aboudreault | with only shlibs | 16:06 |
| TheLordOfTime | isnt shlibs:Depends 's output an automated detection system...? | 16:06 |
| TheLordOfTime | or something. | 16:06 |
| aboudreault | yes. | 16:06 |
| aboudreault | trying to see why it works for all other packages | 16:07 |
| aboudreault | my control file: http://pastebin.com/zp0nwdP4 | 16:08 |
| aboudreault | and the dpkg-deb -I output: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4), libcurl3-gnutls (>= 7.16.2-1), libfreetype6 (>= 2.2.1), libfribidi0 (>= 0.19.2), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgd2-xpm (>= 2.0.36~rc1~dfsg), libgdal1 (>= 1.9.0), libgeos-c1 (>= 3.3.3), libgif4 (>= 4.1.4), libjpeg8 (>= 8c), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4), libpq5, libproj0, libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1), libxml2 (>= 2.7.4) | 16:09 |
| Laney | libproj doesn't call dh_makeshlibs with -V and doesn't have a symbols file or other override, so its reverse dependencies don't get versioned deps | 16:10 |
| TheLordOfTime | Laney, for versioned deps, it'd need to be explicitly defined, righit? | 16:11 |
| TheLordOfTime | (i.e. the packager defines it manually?) | 16:11 |
| TheLordOfTime | for that one dependency (libproj) | 16:12 |
| aboudreault | Laney, this would be IN the proj package? | 16:12 |
| Laney | right | 16:12 |
| Laney | why do you need the version? | 16:13 |
| aboudreault | because we did an upgrade.... but now my package thinks that the old libproj0 is OK... but it isn't | 16:13 |
| highvoltage | o/ | 16:13 |
| aboudreault | since the ABI changed. | 16:13 |
| highvoltage | (that's a hello, for disambiguation purposes) | 16:14 |
| aboudreault | highvoltage, that's not a hello, it means you have a question. thanks for the explanation :P | 16:14 |
| aboudreault | Laney, well... another package (that works) just call dh_makeshlibs -- -c0, and proj call dh_makeshlibs -a | 16:15 |
| ScottK | aboudreault: If the abi changed, it should have a new soname. | 16:16 |
| Laney | I suppose he means new symbols | 16:17 |
| ScottK | Maybe. | 16:17 |
| aboudreault | it's new package, from 4.7 -> 4.8 | 16:17 |
| ScottK | At least a new soversion. | 16:17 |
| aboudreault | I see | 16:17 |
| Laney | aboudreault: does that other package have a debian/*.symbols file? | 16:17 |
| aboudreault | no it doesn't | 16:18 |
| Laney | what is it? | 16:18 |
| aboudreault | ? | 16:18 |
| Laney | which package | 16:18 |
| aboudreault | *proj* | 16:18 |
| Laney | the one that you say works | 16:19 |
| aboudreault | *gdal* works | 16:19 |
| aboudreault | gdal has .symbols file | 16:19 |
| Laney | that'll be why | 16:19 |
| Laney | you might like to submit a patch for proj to give it a symbols file | 16:19 |
| mitya57 | dholbach: can I commit this to u-p-g: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1394918/? | 16:19 |
| mitya57 | hey btw :) | 16:20 |
| dholbach | mitya57, sure, feel free to run 'make gettext' at the same time | 16:20 |
| aboudreault | Laney, .symbols file have to be generated manually? | 16:20 |
| dholbach | mitya57, how did the ppa builds of sphinx go? did you copy them over to the packaging guide ppa? | 16:20 |
| Laney | aboudreault: there are tools to help - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/stefanlsd/dpkg-gensymbols | 16:22 |
| aboudreault | Laney, yes, but should I add this IN my debian/rules, or simply add the symbol files myself? | 16:22 |
| Laney | you need to create a symbols file yourself and put that into debian/ | 16:22 |
| Laney | the build system will then check if new symbols appear/disappear by looking at that file | 16:22 |
| Laney | and then you amend things as necessary | 16:23 |
| mitya57 | dholbach, I managed to upload it to my ppa only today, not built yet | 16:23 |
| aboudreault | Laney, ok, we'll give this a try | 16:23 |
| dholbach | mitya57, gotcha | 16:23 |
| mitya57 | dholbach, for some reason ubuntu tarball of sphinx is not really dfsg and contains files that were removed in debian | 16:24 |
| dholbach | hum - did it get uploaded in Ubuntu first? | 16:24 |
| dholbach | no | 16:25 |
| dholbach | hm | 16:25 |
| dholbach | it was introduced to Ubuntu through https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sphinx/1.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1 | 16:25 |
| mitya57 | I see, yes | 16:25 |
| dholbach | so theoretically the tarball should not differ from Debian | 16:25 |
| micahg | mitya57: are you sure it's the tarball and not some source format 3 silly reversion? | 16:28 |
| mitya57 | micahg: well, md5sums on packages.debian.org and packages.ubuntu.com differ... | 16:29 |
| micahg | mitya57: ah, that's annoying... | 16:29 |
| Laney | what's the right BD for --with python2? | 16:42 |
| * Laney again shows his ignorance of all things cool | 16:42 | |
| Laney | 'python'? | 16:43 |
| micahg | Laney: one of many... | 16:45 |
| Laney | that package appears to have Sequence/python2.pm | 16:46 |
| micahg | Laney: from the Debian wiki: Bump minimum required python-all (or python, python-dev, python-all-dev) package version to 2.6.6-3~ | 16:46 |
| micahg | (read /usr/share/doc/python/changelog.Debian.gz to check if you need a newer version) | 16:46 |
| Laney | heh | 16:46 |
| tumbleweed | that's the version I use. You can get away with a slightly lower version in Ubuntu | 16:46 |
| tumbleweed | but I think that's only useful for releases that are no longer supported | 16:46 |
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| Laney | ta | 16:47 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: lucid is quite supported :) | 16:49 |
| tumbleweed | micahg: no dh_python2 on lucid | 16:50 |
| tumbleweed | it first appeared in maverick, with a version lower than 2.6.6-3~ IIRC | 16:50 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: exactly :) | 16:50 |
| micahg | it prevents stuff from breaking on lucid | 16:51 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| mitya57 | dholbach, it decided to not build on precise: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/124426398/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.sphinx_1.1.3%2Bdfsg-5ubuntu1~ppa1~12.04_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 17:01 |
| mitya57 | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/124426398/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.sphinx_1.1.3%2Bdfsg-5ubuntu1~ppa1~12.04_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 17:01 |
| mitya57 | AssertionError: latex exited with return code 1 | 17:01 |
| dholbach | mitya57, I think we have a bug open about it, might be good to follow up on there with a link to the build log | 17:02 |
| mitya57 | dholbach, which bug? | 17:04 |
| Rcart_ | hello there, I'm working on a bug present since 11.10: bug 943195 | 17:05 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 943195 in xpdf (Ubuntu) "xpdf.real crashed with SIGSEGV in GooHash::hash()" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/943195 | 17:05 |
| === Rcart_ is now known as Rcart | ||
| Rcart | the bug is reported in upstream, with patch available but not applied | 17:05 |
| dholbach | mitya57, I would need to go and find it | 17:06 |
| Rcart | I've successfuly applied the patch in precise, and the bug is corrected | 17:06 |
| dholbach | mitya57, ok, we might need a new bug - it's gone :) | 17:07 |
| mitya57 | where was it at least — on LP or on bitbucket? | 17:07 |
| Rcart | and I would like to know if that fix is could be a SRU | 17:08 |
| dholbach | on LP - I believe it was a packaging guide bug, as it was mostly just relevant to us and our PPA | 17:08 |
| mitya57 | dholbach, the version currently in ppa (-4ubuntu4) built on precise | 17:11 |
| mitya57 | and I don't see anything in -5 changelog that could cause the failure | 17:12 |
| dholbach | mh, no idea right now | 17:12 |
| mitya57 | I'll now try to add l10n_fixes.diff to that (built) version and try to build that | 17:14 |
| mitya57 | Rcart, it would be good to have that SRUed but the fix needs to land in raring first | 17:15 |
| dholbach | thanks mitya57 | 17:19 |
| dholbach | I'll have to rush out in a bit | 17:19 |
| dholbach | so thanks again for your work on this! | 17:19 |
| mitya57 | I'll copy the quantal version now anyway | 17:19 |
| dholbach | thanks mitya57 | 17:25 |
| Rcart | mitya57: in raring, the patch available (in debian) for that xpdf specific version rejects | 17:25 |
| mitya57 | Rcart, so you should fix that I think | 17:25 |
| Rcart | a SRU cannot fit a previous release while not fixed in development version? | 17:26 |
| Laney | hahaha | 17:36 |
| Laney | xnox: so it /was/ the wrong week (-motu@) | 17:37 |
| xnox | Laney: I don't know who broke the order (UDS?), it's in my calendar for this week.... | 17:37 |
| mitya57 | Rcart, yes, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure | 17:37 |
| * micahg thought so | 17:37 | |
| Laney | oh well | 17:38 |
| micahg | xnox: your calendar doesn't take into account 5 Thursday months :) | 17:47 |
| xnox | micahg: it does. | 17:48 |
| xnox | micahg: unless there are special rules around motu meetings and 5 thursday months =) | 17:49 |
| micahg | xnox: yes, we skip the 5th Thursday :0 | 17:49 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === phihag_ is now known as phihag3 | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| Rcart | mitya57: Ok, thanks (: | 18:15 |
| aboudreault | does anyone have tested the open build service ? | 19:58 |
| cody-somerville | I've played with it. | 20:04 |
| aboudreault | cody-somerville, how is it? does it build proper source packages for official debian/ubuntu etc?? | 20:07 |
| cody-somerville | No, the source packages are not proper the last time I checked. | 20:07 |
| cody-somerville | You have to upload sort of a hybrid thing. | 20:07 |
| cody-somerville | and the repository it creates is flat | 20:07 |
| aboudreault | I see | 20:08 |
| cody-somerville | The service overall has some really great features though | 20:09 |
| cody-somerville | and there's some integration with the Suse Studio image build service as well which is real nice | 20:09 |
| jtaylor | is it normal that mongodb fills your disk when you start it? ... | 20:11 |
| jtaylor | now where did it puts its junk ... | 20:13 |
| alo21 | hi all | 20:41 |
| alo21 | I have a problem to build doc-debian | 20:41 |
| alo21 | this is the make file http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1397706/ | 20:42 |
| alo21 | when i run pbuilder, I got this error: ERROR: Cannot find ~/debian/www/webwml/english to regenerate the sources. Please read the TODO. | 20:43 |
| alo21 | and as you notice, this error is handled into the makefile | 20:43 |
| micahg | alo21: that should've been fixed with http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690791 | 20:45 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 690791 in doc-debian "building from source an inconvenient process" [Important,Fixed] | 20:45 |
| alo21 | micahg: weird | 20:53 |
| alo21 | micahg: what do you suggest? | 20:57 |
| micahg | idk, no time to look into it | 20:59 |
| aboudreault | Laney, it works! Thanks a lot | 22:03 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| bdrung | cjwatson: which kind of packages build depend on devscripts? | 23:36 |
| bdrung | what do they need from devscripts? | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!