[13:15] <ttoine> hello
[14:06] <scott-wokr> good morning everyone
[14:08] <len-dt> scott-wokr, good morning...
[14:10] <scott-wokr> oops
[21:28] <len-dt> holstein, just a note.. I have been doing a little reading and it appears there is a trade off between throughput and latency. Higher latency/larger chunks of data works better for throughput... and most of the version changes for PCIe have been made to increase throughput,
[21:28] <len-dt> but... to make bigger data chunks requires bigger headers.
[21:29] <len-dt> For low latency the data chunks need to be smaller.
[21:29] <len-dt> on a high throughput system that means the data headers may be as big as the data.
[21:30] <len-dt> For most uses, bigger throughput seems faster... program loads faster off the disk for example
[21:31] <len-dt> Audio has different needs.
[22:18] <len-dt> All that to say, the low latency kernel should not slow the system down unless something is using the lowlatency parts, in which case the desktop may seem slower