[01:57] <cjwatson> slangasek: ^- above ubiquity upload is for the bug we discussed in Wednesday's team meeting; it did indeed turn out to be an issue with signed kernel handling
[06:05] <ScottK> infinity: I put chort onto manual due to chroot problems.
[06:06] <infinity> Ugh.
[06:06] <infinity> ScottK: Thanks.
[06:06] <ScottK> No problem.
[06:06] <ScottK> Glad I have powerz because it's be tough to get this KDE SRU building right on all archs without it.
[06:08] <infinity> ScottK: Just don't let the powerpc queue empty, or you'll end up stuck behind a chromium and a kernel.
[06:09] <ScottK> Yeah.  No danger of that.
[06:09] <infinity> Not that I wouldn't like to see that kernel build some day. :P
[06:09] <ScottK> I think it'll get built this weekend.
[06:10] <infinity> Seems likely.  The queue's not as deep as LP thinks it is.  It kinda sucks at math.
[06:10] <ScottK> Timewise with KDE, I'm thinking armel might lose the race.
[06:13] <infinity> I'm just afraid we'll keep bumping off Pandas all weekend.  Hopefully they won't all follow caph and chort.
[10:50] <infinity> ScottK: I'm finally letting that kernel trickle through on ross, adare should finish chewing through the KDE stuff on its own, I imagine.
[14:28] <ScottK> infinity: I'm sure we'll get there.
[14:36] <infinity> ScottK: Yeah.
[14:36] <infinity> ScottK: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/powerpc/+builds?build_text=&build_state=pending is nearly cleared out, so we should be in good shape.
[14:37] <infinity> ScottK: Oh, and kdeplasma-addons is dep-wait all over.
[14:38] <ScottK> Yeah.  Fixing right now.
[14:38] <ScottK> We didn't upload the packages that had no changes in them and that had a versioned b-d on one of them.
[14:38] <infinity> build-dep version too high, or missed an upload of the newer libkexiv?
[14:38] <infinity> Ahh, I guess you just answered that, if it had no changes.
[14:40] <ScottK> It's a bit of an abuse technically, but we use versioned b-d to make sure everything builds against the same version of the KDE libs.
[14:40]  * infinity nods.
[14:40] <ScottK> Just uploaded it.  Would you please review/accept when it hits the queue.
[14:40] <infinity> Sure.
[14:41] <ScottK> Thanks.
[14:52] <ScottK> Had one chroot failure on nikusui while I was sleeping.  When I retried the package it landed on nikusui again and was fine.
[14:52] <ScottK> More cosmic rays I guess.
[15:21] <ScottK> infinity: What to do about https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rocs/4:4.9.3-0ubuntu0.1/+build/4027053 - it finished hours ago and then, apparently, got stuck.
[15:21] <ScottK> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audiocd-kio/4:4.9.3-0ubuntu0.1/+build/4026342 is hung up as well, although rather earlier in the process.
[15:24] <infinity> ScottK: I can force them to get retried, but at the expense of knocking another two Pandas out for the weekend.
[15:24]  * infinity shrugs.
[15:24] <infinity> May as well.
[15:26] <ScottK> I think they are knocked out either way.
[15:26] <ScottK> Thanks.
[15:26] <infinity> Yeah, fair point.
[15:27] <infinity> Hrm, curious.  buildd-manager reaped and reassigned one of them, but not the other.
[15:29] <infinity> I think it may have forgotten that altais exists.
[15:31] <infinity> ScottK: Is this "call an emergency number" urgent, or can I see if anyone's idling this weekend to fix it, and otherwise make it happy Monday morning?
[15:31] <infinity> (Well, Sunday night when APAC gets in)
[15:31] <ScottK> Not an emergency.
[15:32] <ScottK> It has to sit iin -proposed for a week anyway.
[15:32] <ScottK> And I won't release it to updates during the weekend, so it doesn't actually affect the timeline.
[15:32]  * infinity nods.
[15:33] <ScottK> The only thing it really affects is that's one more tab in my browser I could close.
[15:33] <ScottK> ;-)
[15:33] <infinity> Heh.  It's two tabs in my browser, and a query window or two in my IRC client.
[15:33] <infinity> You can ignore it. :P
[20:10] <bdmurray> slangasek: protobuf in oneiric can be removed due to lack of verification
[21:03] <slangasek> infinity: hmm, so I hadn't accepted the ubiquity SRU yet because I don't see a test case for bugs 1068178 and 1024343; AIUI this is a race condition of some kind
[21:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1068178 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Precise) "ubi-usersetup failed with exit code 1 on preseeded - encrypted-home installations on precise" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1068178
[21:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1024343 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Quantal desktop encrypted home unable to install due to ubi-usersetup failing with exit code 1" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1024343
[21:04] <slangasek> bdmurray: removed
[21:29] <ScottK> infinity: ^^^ there you go.
[21:30] <ScottK> We might even get the powerpc swamp drained today.
[21:31] <xnox> slangasek: accepted ubiquity srun into proposed or into updates?
[21:32] <xnox> wait it is in proposed now.
[21:32]  * xnox goes to investigate.
[21:36]  * xnox commented on the bugs.
[21:37] <xnox> slangasek: the test case for the both bugs is fully automated installation via preseed file attached to one of the bugs. Which is also availalbe from ubuntu-iso-testing bzr branch and is continuously run in jenkins.
[22:38] <xnox> infinity: can you comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1068199 is it lucid only or should be applied to other releases as well?
[22:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1068199 in eglibc (Ubuntu Lucid) "please add support for MAP_HUGETLB in eglibc for Lucid" [High,In progress]
[22:39]  * xnox should have gone to -devel.