/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/12/02/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
coolbhaviajmitch, hey07:57
ajmitchhello again07:58
coolbhaviseems like quadrispro cant make it07:58
coolbhavi#startmeeting ubuntu arb meeting07:59
meetingologyMeeting started Sun Dec  2 07:59:19 2012 UTC.  The chair is coolbhavi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.07:59
meetingologyAvailable commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired07:59
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ubuntu arb meeting Meeting | Current topic:
coolbhaviajmitch, here is the agenda: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Agenda08:00
ajmitchyep, I have it open08:00
ajmitchit's been awhile since the last meeting & the group has shrunk a little bit, not sure how relevant old action items are08:01
coolbhaviajmitch, yes. So there are a couple of real burning issues: 1) the review process almost seems to be slowed down 2) the dev's who have submitted their packages as a part of app developer showdown are really angry08:02
ajmitchyes, I'm sorry that I haven't been doing a lot on the queue lately, I'm guessing that we've had 0 interest from other ubuntu developers to look over packages08:03
coolbhaviajmitch,  thats perfectly fine :-) any thoughts on how to keep the reviews rolling over until we have the new arb process in place?08:04
* ajmitch has been trying to look at tools more than the queue lately, but hasn't got much to show08:05
ajmitchthere's no easy way to get the reviews done unless we just do them08:05
ajmitcheven if I get you a queue that has lintian/licensecheck run & builds packages automatically, there's still a fair bit of manual work to do08:06
* coolbhavi too is concentrating on getting arb profile into lintian so we can get another app review week going08:06
ajmitchthat'll help a bit08:07
ajmitchmost of the work items I have from UDS are related to tools like this08:07
coolbhaviany thoughts of about getting the queue closed for sometime (as in a freeze period) and concentrate on clearing the queue08:08
coolbhavifor some time?08:08
coolbhaviwould that help?08:08
ajmitchwe don't have a large number of new submissions, I think closing the queue could be seen fairly negatively08:08
ajmitchthen again, it's not like we could make the reputation much worse :)08:09
coolbhavihmm agreed it has negatives but the queue has around 100+ apps I believe08:10
ajmitchwe did talk about this at UDS & considering closing the queue to be a bad idea08:11
ajmitchdo you think we can just pick through the queue for packages that are 99% ready & get those in?08:11
ajmitchI'll try & get some of this automation in place asap so that we can see what's low-hanging fruit08:12
coolbhaviyes those in pending review and review in progress especially ones from app-developer-showdown might help08:13
ajmitchany ideas on convincing people that they should help out? :)08:15
ajmitchit's been a struggle since the ARB was introduced, so I'm not optimistic08:15
coolbhaviI'll add a action item for both then to identify packages which are already in shape08:16
coolbhaviyes but as you said it was a struggle as it requires some amount of motivation and free time08:17
ajmitchand for people to consider extras.u.c to be worthwhile08:17
ajmitchfor most developers, new packages are a low priority anyway08:18
coolbhavi+1 added to that the queue is not so public facing08:18
coolbhavi#action ajmitch and coolbhavi to scout for some low hanging fruits in the queue to help clear the queue08:20
meetingologyACTION: ajmitch and coolbhavi to scout for some low hanging fruits in the queue to help clear the queue08:20
coolbhavido you think a new round of recruitment can help in this regard?08:21
coolbhaviajmitch, ^^08:21
ajmitchmaybe a little bit, but we haven't really had anyone interested despite recent mails to the list about the process08:22
coolbhaviyes. but considering a 7 member team will be more effective than a 3 member team right now it might help08:23
ajmitchsure, if you can get 4 more people to step forward & commit08:24
coolbhaviI'll bring this up on the list then for discussion08:24
coolbhavi#action coolbhavi to mail the arb list about a new round of recruitment08:25
meetingologyACTION: coolbhavi to mail the arb list about a new round of recruitment08:25
ajmitchok08:25
ajmitchhas the TB approved the process change?08:28
coolbhaviajmitch, the other two points were: still we have not got any formal signoff from the TB regarding new arb process and we were not able to meet frequently in the recent past08:28
coolbhaviajmitch, can you help regarding reaching out to the TB for a formal approval?08:29
ajmitchyes, that's why I asked about the TB signoff, I know that it was mentioned in a TB meeting08:30
ajmitchhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-November/001437.html is the last action on the TB list08:30
ajmitchI'll check & see if they want to approve it or if we just go with it08:31
coolbhavigreat!08:31
ajmitchI suspect they'll be fine with us just going ahead, there were no objections on the list08:31
coolbhaviyes agreed but a formal signoff would be a good go ahead signal for us to atleast follow up on ubuntu-devel08:32
ajmitchright08:32
ajmitchso the other thing is more regular meetings08:33
coolbhaviI'll mark down an action for this08:33
coolbhavi#action ajmitch to check with the TB for approval of new arb process08:34
meetingologyACTION: ajmitch to check with the TB for approval of new arb process08:34
coolbhaviregarding meetings08:34
coolbhavihow about having meetings on sunday this time as long as a new recruitment run goes into pace?08:35
ajmitchfine by me08:35
coolbhavigreat then! ll catch up with alessio too regarding this.08:36
ajmitchok, hopefully he can make it to the next one08:37
ajmitchI'm guessing once a month is enough?08:37
coolbhaviright. but twice in a month for next couple of months maybe wont harm as it enables us to track the queue better I think. But then its your choice :)08:38
ajmitchchristmas holidays are coming up, so twice a month will be pushing it08:39
coolbhavi:) fine then!08:40
coolbhaviany other things up for discussion?08:40
ajmitchI think that's about it08:41
coolbhavithanks a lot ajmitch for coming in :) you are really one of the arb's rockstars :)08:42
ajmitchno, not really :P08:42
coolbhaviatleast you were one of those guys who formed the arb :) thanks a lot again!08:43
coolbhavi#endmeeting08:43
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
meetingologyMeeting ended Sun Dec  2 08:43:29 2012 UTC.08:43
meetingologyMinutes (wiki):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-12-02-07.59.moin.txt08:43
meetingologyMinutes (html):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-12-02-07.59.html08:43
ajmitchthanks for chairing, I'll try & get some stuff together soon to help with reviews08:43
ajmitchfor now, I'm out, see you round08:43
coolbhavino mention :-) ciao08:43
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!