[16:43] <rbasak> Please could someone accept my nomination for a precise task on bug 1085593?
[16:43] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1085593 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "bind 9.8.1-P1 crashes with an assertion failure" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1085593
[16:44] <TheLordOfTime> did you test quantal too?
[16:44]  * TheLordOfTime can't accept the nomination, but is curious whether it happens in quantal
[16:45] <TheLordOfTime> since i see raring and precise mentioned
[16:45] <micahg> rbasak: I'm reluctant to accept that based on your comments...not sure that'll fly as an SRU
[16:46] <micahg> unless you were planning to cherry pick
[16:46] <rbasak> micahg: which part? Identifying and cherry-picking the fix will, surely?
[16:46] <micahg> yeah, ok, task granted
[16:46] <rbasak> Thank you!
[16:47] <rbasak> I wasn't planning on asking for a micro release exception. I was just explaining that this was the process to answer the reporter's question
[16:47] <micahg> ok
[18:53] <pietro98-albini> hello
[18:53] <pietro98-albini> i don't know how to triage this bug:
[18:53] <pietro98-albini> bug 1086506
[18:53] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1086506 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "Network Manager applet wireless connections refresh too slow" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1086506
[18:53] <pietro98-albini> it is a bug?
[20:49] <penguin42> hmm - what's the right thing to do with bugs that an update on the current version has stopped booting/killed X, and so they gave up and installed Windows - it seems wrong to mark invalid for a bug where a minor update did that, but there's not much I can do with the bug if they can't get any more debug
[20:53] <penguin42> in this case bug 1085541
[20:53] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1085541 in xorg (Ubuntu) "Latest updates break X" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1085541
[22:05] <chilicuil> I'd had done the same, it's incomplete IMO penguin42
[23:21] <penguin42> chilicuil: yeh that's what I settled on; I like to try and hang on as much as possible to something that could be a serious bug