| TheLordOfTime | anyone on the backports team alive and willing to look at two backport requests (one depends on the other0 | 04:47 |
|---|---|---|
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 08:07 |
| geser | good morning dholbach | 08:07 |
| dholbach | hi geser | 08:08 |
| geser | dholbach: http://gegen-den-strich.com/428.html | 08:09 |
| dholbach | HAHAHA | 08:10 |
| * dholbach hugs geser | 08:10 | |
| ajmitch | hi dholbach, geser | 08:33 |
| dholbach | hi ajmitch | 08:33 |
| ajmitch | how have those hangouts been going? | 08:35 |
| geser | Hi ajmitch | 08:53 |
| === Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| jtaylor | someone know if universe/main will continue to be separated for raring? | 18:12 |
| ScottK | Nothing is likely to change. | 18:13 |
| xnox | jtaylor: what is your complete question for asking that? Do you have a question about what will happen after archive reorganisation? | 18:29 |
| alo21 | hi | 18:38 |
| alo21 | I have a doubt about how to fill in changelog in a merge... | 18:39 |
| alo21 | If I make some changes, have I to write what I did in the changelog? | 18:39 |
| tumbleweed | you always should, yes | 18:40 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed, I had a lot of changes | 18:40 |
| ScottK | You have to document them all. | 18:41 |
| jtaylor | xnox: I was told after the reorg we do not have to split source packages anymore | 18:41 |
| xnox | jtaylor: correct. | 18:41 |
| ScottK | We don't actually have very many of those. | 18:41 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed, for example I edited Makefile, so I should write - edit makefie | 18:42 |
| xnox | jtaylor: but we are not there yet. | 18:42 |
| tumbleweed | alo21: that wouldn't be a vary useful changelog entry | 18:42 |
| tumbleweed | alo21: you explain what you did, and why | 18:42 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed, I am under a voice 'remaining changes'... | 18:44 |
| alo21 | but I have made new changes, so I suppose I have to write that changes (new one), after and not under 'remaining changes'. Right? | 18:46 |
| tumbleweed | correct | 18:47 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed, for example as here: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1413044/ | 18:50 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| alo21 | tumbleweed, notice that without the patch (mentioned in changelog), the build fails | 18:50 |
| TheLordOfTime | i think 'Added new patch' should be 'Added new patch to fix [issue]' | 18:51 |
| TheLordOfTime | so people know what the patch does | 18:52 |
| TheLordOfTime | just my two cents ;) | 18:52 |
| TheLordOfTime | (as a bugs triager, if the given patch introduces a regression, which sometimes happens, its easy to trace what patch(es) cause the issues, then, when the changelog identifies what the "new" patch does.) | 18:53 |
| alo21 | TheLordOfTime, for example the pace is used to build the package on ubuntu only. My deal is: have that entry be a part the 'remaining change', or not? | 18:53 |
| alo21 | the patch has been created now (by me) to build the package | 18:54 |
| TheLordOfTime | if what you said there is the changelog... and the patch is new, i'm not certain it goes under "remaining changes" because its newly introduced | 18:55 |
| TheLordOfTime | tumbleweed'd know more though, i usually don't handle merges ;P | 18:55 |
| TheLordOfTime | in fact, i don't normally. :P | 18:55 |
| * TheLordOfTime was commenting on the lack of a specific description in your statement about a new patch | 18:55 | |
| alo21 | ok thanks anyway | 18:55 |
| TheLordOfTime | But if i may interpret tumbleweed here, when he said this is correct: <alo21> but I have made new changes, so I suppose I have to write that changes (new one), after and not under 'remaining changes'. Right? | 18:56 |
| TheLordOfTime | I think its safe to assume he means "Yes, it goes after remaining changes, and not a part of remaining changes" | 18:56 |
| TheLordOfTime | but that's only based on my observations here and my interpretation, which may be wrong ;P | 18:57 |
| alo21 | seems to be the most reasonable behaviour | 18:58 |
| alo21 | done! | 19:02 |
| === VORIAN is now known as v | ||
| === v is now known as vorian | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!