[00:53] <j4jackj> is a language designed to  be sspoken by humans a valid LP project?
[01:03] <j4jackj> is a language designed to  be sspoken by humans a valid LP project?
[04:50] <j4jackj> is a constructed language (for humans) a good project on launchpad?
[05:01] <PsyberS> am i supposed to be able to change the bug Importance field of *any* bug (even ones im not a member of the team for)?
[05:01] <PsyberS> or did i just find a bug? ;)
[05:01] <j4jackj> is a constructed language (for humans) a good project on launchpad?
[05:10] <j4jackj> i hate these weirdos  in -offtopic.
[05:10] <j4jackj> I'm better at real life interactions..
[07:05] <freedomrun> arrrrghhh
[07:06] <freedomrun> there goes my 1h:30min translation
[11:13] <mpt> czajkowski, I hear you want some more work from me?
[11:14] <czajkowski> mpt: only if I can have my restart button later back :)
[11:14] <czajkowski> fair trade :)
[11:14] <mpt> czajkowski, deal.
[11:15] <mpt> czajkowski, spam comment in bug 570682.
[11:15] <czajkowski> done
[11:21] <mpt> ta
[11:22] <czajkowski> mpt: now my bug :)
[17:38] <ricotz> czajkowski, hi :), thank you
[17:40] <czajkowski> ricotz: you're welcome
[17:42] <ricotz> czajkowski, i hope this works well
[18:19] <ricotz> czajkowski, is the armhf support restricted to specific releases or enabled for all supported ones (as in precise, quantal, raring)?
[18:22] <ricotz> czajkowski, is it possible to restrict it to raring only for now?
[18:57] <czajkowski> ricotz: no not really, except maybe if you use arch tags in the packaging
[19:02] <ricotz> czajkowski, i see, you surprised me with this activation a bit here ;)
[19:03] <ricotz> czajkowski, is it possible to get this support for the other elementary ppas too for having a consistent build environment?
[19:04] <czajkowski> ricotz: yes but not going to happen today, will be monday and we will have a new policy in place for this, one a per request basis
[19:05] <ricotz> czajkowski, alright, thank you
[19:25] <dobey> hmm
[19:29] <benji> heh
[22:07] <slank> how can I use the API to find the architecture for a particular builder? that's listed on the lp.net/builders page, but it's not returned in the API?
[23:37] <xnox> slank: why? builders frequently change.
[23:38] <slank> xnox: I'm not sure why that matters. I'm trying to see the builder arch so I can get a clue as to what sort of reset/rebuild/stab options are appropriate.
[23:40] <xnox> slank: hmm... I'd want to know your usecase / reason behind the request. Maybe it can be solved in some other way.
[23:41] <xnox> e.g. http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/primary-raring.html
[23:41] <xnox> and the buildlog has full details of builder / arches / configuration etc.
[23:42] <slank> xnox: (btw, I'm webops) this is for a buildd reset script I've built.
[23:42] <xnox> slank: ah =) you are one of the people who know what you are doing =)))))
[23:43] <slank> right now, it just looks at virtual vs physical builders, but I'd like to spot the pandas and add a powercycle option too.
[23:43] <xnox> I see.
[23:43] <xnox> that would be awesome to have indeed!
[23:45] <xnox> slank: getBuildersForQueue seems to returns builder collection that way you can get the list of all pandas. Query for: non-virt & armhf/armel
[23:45] <xnox> https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#builders
[23:45] <xnox> a bit backwards, but should work.
[23:46] <slank> xnox: ah there we go. no that's good. I can pull the names and compare that to the list of builders that are down
[23:46] <slank> thanks!
[23:46] <xnox> no problem.
[23:47] <slank> oh wait... there's a processor link in each builder record. not sure how I missed that
[23:47] <slank> I think I was just looking for arch and I ignored anything that said "link"