| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === pedro_ is now known as Guest11825 | ||
| === Guest11825 is now known as pedro_ | ||
| === pedro_ is now known as Guest67914 | ||
| bremner | I'm working through getting an SRU for bliss 0.72-4. I made (and closed) a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bliss/+bug/1087771 . It seems the next step is to find a "bug-supervisor" ? Is this the right place for that? | 16:51 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1087771 in bliss (Ubuntu) "omitting BLISS_USE_GMP causes mysterious failures" [Undecided,Fix released] | 16:51 |
| mitya57 | bremner: nominated for 12.04 (precise) and 12.10 (quantal). A release team member will need to approve that. | 16:54 |
| bremner | thanks | 16:55 |
| mitya57 | bremer: btw, does upstream know that their license headers mention "foobar"? | 16:57 |
| mitya57 | "You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with Foobar." | 16:57 |
| mitya57 | bremner: ^^ (sorry for typo) | 16:58 |
| micahg | bremner: tasks approved, can you please make it clear which diff applies to which release (precise has -2, quantal -3) | 16:59 |
| micahg | mitya57: release team doesn't need to approve tasks, an Ubuntu dev does (SRU team does review in queue) | 16:59 |
| micahg | *Ubuntu dev that can upload said package | 16:59 |
| mitya57 | micahg: sorry, I meant "~ubuntu-drivers" | 17:01 |
| micahg | that's just one option | 17:01 |
| bremner | micahg: I attached seperate debdiffs for the two versions. | 17:26 |
| micahg | bremner: you probably want to collapse the changelogs and change the version to whatever it was in the release with ubuntu0.1 on the end of it (standard SRU versining) | 17:29 |
| micahg | and target $RELEASE-proposed | 17:29 |
| micahg | alternatively, add a changelog on top with ~ubuntuXX.XX.1 where XX.XX is the numeric version of the release and close the SRU bug in the top changelog | 17:30 |
| bremner | I supppose close the SRU bug in either case? | 17:31 |
| bremner | any preferences between the two versions? I suppose version 2 sounds slightly better to me. | 17:32 |
| micahg | bremner: yes, the SRU bug should be in the changelog (LP: #XXXXXX) regardless, and since we're probably taking all the changes, either should be fine (I like the second in this scenario as well) | 17:36 |
| === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!