=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== pedro_ is now known as Guest11825
=== Guest11825 is now known as pedro_
=== pedro_ is now known as Guest67914
[16:51] <bremner> I'm working through getting an SRU for bliss 0.72-4. I made (and closed) a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bliss/+bug/1087771 . It seems the next step is to find a "bug-supervisor" ? Is this the right place for that?
[16:51] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1087771 in bliss (Ubuntu) "omitting BLISS_USE_GMP causes mysterious failures" [Undecided,Fix released]
[16:54] <mitya57> bremner: nominated for 12.04 (precise) and 12.10 (quantal). A release team member will need to approve that.
[16:55] <bremner> thanks
[16:57] <mitya57> bremer: btw, does upstream know that their license headers mention "foobar"?
[16:57] <mitya57> "You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with Foobar."
[16:58] <mitya57> bremner: ^^ (sorry for typo)
[16:59] <micahg> bremner: tasks approved, can you please make it clear which diff applies to which release (precise has -2, quantal -3)
[16:59] <micahg> mitya57: release team doesn't need to approve tasks, an Ubuntu dev does (SRU team does review in queue)
[16:59] <micahg> *Ubuntu dev that can upload said package
[17:01] <mitya57> micahg: sorry, I meant "~ubuntu-drivers"
[17:01] <micahg> that's just one option
[17:26] <bremner> micahg: I attached seperate debdiffs for the two versions.
[17:29] <micahg> bremner: you probably want to collapse the changelogs and change the version to whatever it was in the release with ubuntu0.1 on the end of it (standard SRU versining)
[17:29] <micahg> and target $RELEASE-proposed
[17:30] <micahg> alternatively, add a changelog on top with ~ubuntuXX.XX.1 where XX.XX is the numeric version of the release and close the SRU bug in the top changelog
[17:31] <bremner> I supppose close the SRU bug in either case?
[17:32] <bremner> any preferences between the two versions? I suppose version 2 sounds slightly better to me.
[17:36] <micahg> bremner: yes, the SRU bug should be in the changelog (LP: #XXXXXX) regardless, and since we're probably taking all the changes, either should be fine (I like the second in this scenario as well)
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh