| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:45 |
|---|---|---|
| achiang | dholbach: good morning | 07:46 |
| dholbach | hey achiang | 07:46 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === infinity1 is now known as infinity | ||
| bdrung | \o/ the sponsor queue is below 50 | 11:21 |
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| dholbach | bdrung, not quite 0, but a definite improvement! :) | 11:49 |
| bdrung | dholbach: yes. we are half there ;) | 11:50 |
| alo21 | hi everybody... | 12:49 |
| alo21 | I have a question about tjis: | 12:50 |
| alo21 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doc-debian/+bug/1086940 | 12:50 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1086940 in doc-debian (Ubuntu) "Merge doc-debian 4.0.2ubuntu1 (universe) from Debian unstable" [Undecided,Fix released] | 12:50 |
| alo21 | this* | 12:50 |
| alo21 | Launchpad Janitor set the bug as 'fix released', and in fact the new package had been uploaded for Raring | 12:51 |
| alo21 | my question is: why Launchpad Janitor did this? I mean motu usually take care about it (sponsoring), and not LP Janitor | 12:52 |
| jtaylor | its automatic if the bugs are closed in the changelog | 12:54 |
| alo21 | jtaylor, and who merged the package? | 12:55 |
| alo21 | a motu? | 12:56 |
| jtaylor | jamespage | 12:57 |
| jtaylor | sponsored your merge | 12:57 |
| jamespage | alo21, jtaylor: I most certainly did :-) | 12:57 |
| alo21 | jamespage, jtaylor I made this question, because I see it for my first time | 12:59 |
| jtaylor | the information is here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doc-debian/6.1ubuntu1 | 12:59 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| bdrung | alo21: look at "sponsored by" on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doc-debian/6.1ubuntu1 | 13:08 |
| alo21 | bdrung, yea.. thanks | 13:08 |
| alo21 | jtaylor, may I ask you a last thing? | 13:09 |
| bdrung | alo21, jamespage: re the doc-debian merge. the remaining change for 6.1ubuntu1 is completely different than 4.0.2ubuntu1 | 13:09 |
| bdrung | and the ubuntu diff from 4.0.2ubuntu1 was dropped | 13:09 |
| bdrung | was that intentional? | 13:09 |
| alo21 | bdrung, I attached the debdiff between the old and the new Ubuntu, because I made it in other package. | 13:11 |
| alo21 | a motu-member accepted the debdiff between the two ubuntu's version | 13:11 |
| * alo21 afk | 13:11 | |
| jamespage | bdrung, it is; thats my bad for not ensuring that was documented. | 13:12 |
| jamespage | its actually more of a re-sync with debian and fix the build failure. | 13:12 |
| bdrung | okay. a better changelog entry would be good next time | 13:12 |
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === soren_ is now known as soren | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
| Logan_ | jamespage: Hey, are you around? | 21:24 |
| jamespage | Logan_, yes | 21:47 |
| Logan_ | jamespage: Do you have any idea why the clamsmtp merge I did caused an amd64 FTBFS/fail to upload to archive? | 21:48 |
| Logan_ | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamsmtp/1.10-11ubuntu1/+build/4044824 says it failed to upload, but the build log says that it built successfully. | 21:48 |
| jamespage | Logan_: I would suspect some sort of transient issue - I've pressed the rebuild button | 21:49 |
| jamespage | lets see if it does it again | 21:50 |
| Logan_ | kk | 21:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!