[07:45] <dholbach> good morning
[07:46] <achiang> dholbach: good morning
[07:46] <dholbach> hey achiang
[11:21] <bdrung> \o/ the sponsor queue is below 50
[11:49] <dholbach> bdrung, not quite 0, but a definite improvement! :)
[11:50] <bdrung> dholbach: yes. we are half there ;)
[12:49] <alo21> hi everybody...
[12:50] <alo21> I have a question about tjis:
[12:50] <alo21> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doc-debian/+bug/1086940
[12:50] <alo21> this*
[12:51] <alo21> Launchpad Janitor set the bug as 'fix released', and in fact the new package had been uploaded for Raring
[12:52] <alo21> my question is: why Launchpad Janitor did this? I mean motu usually take care about it (sponsoring), and not LP Janitor
[12:54] <jtaylor> its automatic if the bugs are closed in the changelog
[12:55] <alo21> jtaylor, and who merged the package?
[12:56] <alo21> a motu?
[12:57] <jtaylor> jamespage
[12:57] <jtaylor> sponsored your merge
[12:57] <jamespage> alo21, jtaylor: I most certainly did :-)
[12:59] <alo21> jamespage, jtaylor I made this question, because I see it for my first time
[12:59] <jtaylor> the information is here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doc-debian/6.1ubuntu1
[13:08] <bdrung> alo21: look at "sponsored by" on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doc-debian/6.1ubuntu1
[13:08] <alo21> bdrung, yea.. thanks
[13:09] <alo21> jtaylor, may I ask you a last thing?
[13:09] <bdrung> alo21, jamespage: re the doc-debian merge. the remaining change for 6.1ubuntu1 is completely different than 4.0.2ubuntu1
[13:09] <bdrung> and the ubuntu diff from 4.0.2ubuntu1 was dropped
[13:09] <bdrung> was that intentional?
[13:11] <alo21> bdrung, I attached the debdiff between the old and the new Ubuntu, because I made it in other package.
[13:11] <alo21> a motu-member accepted the debdiff between the two ubuntu's version
[13:11]  * alo21 afk
[13:12] <jamespage> bdrung, it is; thats my bad for not ensuring that was documented.
[13:12] <jamespage> its actually more of a re-sync with debian and fix the build failure.
[13:12] <bdrung> okay. a better changelog entry would be good next time
[21:24] <Logan_> jamespage: Hey, are you around?
[21:47] <jamespage> Logan_, yes
[21:48] <Logan_> jamespage: Do you have any idea why the clamsmtp merge I did caused an amd64 FTBFS/fail to upload to archive?
[21:48] <Logan_> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamsmtp/1.10-11ubuntu1/+build/4044824 says it failed to upload, but the build log says that it built successfully.
[21:49] <jamespage> Logan_: I would suspect some sort of transient issue - I've pressed the rebuild button
[21:50] <jamespage> lets see if it does it again
[21:50] <Logan_> kk