[00:00] <xnox> but it would be extremely useful to get provisioning syslog out in either case.
[00:00] <xnox> and i mean jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com in above URLs.
[00:00]  * xnox goes to fix my hosts.
[00:09] <SergioMeneses> hi guys!
[00:09] <SergioMeneses> phillw, are you busy now?
[00:10] <phillw> SergioMeneses: never too busy to help
[00:11] <SergioMeneses> jeje that's the spirit!
[00:13] <phillw> SergioMeneses: I'm just setting up a new Virtual Machine for a team, so please accept that it may may take 30 - 60 seconds to reply. But, I am still here and will answer
[01:20] <wigs> Is there a process besides uploading to -proposed to get the SRU team to review a patch?
[01:21] <wigs> ubuntu-sponsors refuse to upload without an ACK from the SRU team.
[02:28] <xnox> wigs: do you have a bug number?
[02:28] <xnox> wigs: or reference to such a request?
[02:30] <wigs> bug 831768
[02:34] <xnox> wigs: that beast. so is the precise debdiff attached at the bug report correct?
[02:34] <wigs> xnox: Yes.
[02:36] <Noskcaj> That. is a big bug. how has it been unfixed so long?
[02:37] <xnox> wigs: subscribed sru-team & requested a review. All sru-team members should get an email about it now.
[02:38] <xnox> wigs: Noskcaj: this bug has extremely high chance of regression in a stable release. Personally I would be against sru'ing this.
[02:38] <wigs> xnox: Thanks.  I had thought ubuntu-sru subscription was it.
[02:39] <xnox> np.
[02:39] <wigs> Noskcaj: Aptitude has been unmaintained for a long time, and it's dependency resolver is hairy.
[02:39] <Noskcaj> ok
[02:40] <Noskcaj> and i thought bug 1066435 was a big problem
[02:42] <wigs> Noskcaj: The fix has been available since September.  An incorrect status on the sponsorship overview resulted in two long stints on that queue before it was uploaded to Quantal.
[02:42] <wigs> but you know :-/
[02:42] <Noskcaj> oh
[02:43] <wigs> xnox: I agree about the high chance, though reports from users indicate there is no breakage, and this package is quite broken by the bug.
[02:43] <Noskcaj> y
[02:44] <wigs> Noskcaj: The open bug task on Precise caused the report to say “SRU (Precise)” even though the sponsorship request was actually for upload to Quantal.  The person that looked at the request only did so briefly, and removed it from the queue due to lack of SRU fields in the description.
[02:47] <Noskcaj> i think i understnd what you two are talking about
[03:46] <Noskcaj> can someone confirm bug 1087409?
[05:27] <nm_geo> interesting ubiquity bug 1085961 which I marked as affecting me.  It is a along side install failure that collin watson fixed in ubiquity 2.13.7
[05:29] <nm_geo> What's interesting today is Lubuntu desktop amd64 20121207 fails in the same manner., but I am installing Ubuntu desktop amd64 20121207 and it is installing just fine along side after re-sizing the partitions
[14:36] <smartboyhw> Does anyone know who is/are the owner(s) of the Laptop QA Tracker?
[15:35] <grabnheisla> hello
[15:48] <phillw> smartboyhw: I don't, but stgraber may be able to answer that one :)
[15:48] <smartboyhw> phillw, I know now
[15:49] <smartboyhw> phillw, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-laptop-testing-admins
[15:49] <phillw> ah, okies :)
[15:49] <smartboyhw> It is skaet plus primes2h
[15:49] <smartboyhw> Though both of them are not in this channel
[15:50] <smartboyhw> Nor in #ubuntu-release
[15:56] <phillw> kate does have a life away from ubuntu :P
[16:00] <smartboyhw> phillw, :P
[16:00] <smartboyhw> bye guy
[16:00] <smartboyhw> s/guy/guys
[19:47] <Noskcaj> is anyone able to confirm bug 1087797
[19:50] <Noskcaj> just found something interesting. the ubuntu daily (i686 at least) has no "close" option in firefox. i.e. no minimise, maximise, close
[20:52] <Noskcaj> does the laptop team have a separate irc channel, because i just found a very interesting bug for one laptop in particular. bug 1087797
[21:27] <Noskcaj> can someone confirm bug 1088054
[21:56] <Noskcaj> phillw:  does the laptop team have a separate irc channel or just use this one? i found a very interesting bug for one laptop in particular. bug 1087797
[21:57] <phillw> Noskcaj: from what I've read, they state to use here.
[21:58] <Noskcaj> then laptop people: someone needs to confirm this bug
[21:59] <Noskcaj> also phillw: as no-one else ever responds on this channel, are you able to get the ubuntu daily iso? (any architexture)
[22:01] <phillw> Noskcaj: I'm on my 3G device, data allowance trickles through my hands at an alarming rate :/
[22:02] <Noskcaj> oh yeah, forgot
[22:02] <Noskcaj> the i will message random lurkers till i get a responce
[22:03] <Noskcaj> TheDrums, trijntje: can both of you download an ubuntu daily iso?
[22:05] <Noskcaj> tubadaz, toddy, Ursinha do that as well
[22:15] <toddy> I download the daily iso. three minutes to go, Noskcaj
[22:16] <Noskcaj> toddy, your now my favourite lurker. say things more often
[22:17] <Noskcaj> i just need someone to confirm 1088054