| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| StevenK | wgrant: So, why do we want to forbid substring matching for versions? The contrived example I can come up with is an API request for 'libuser' '2.0-1ubuntu' to see what the state of all Ubuntu modified uploads are. | 23:40 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | StevenK: People can use the publication APIs for that if they want | 23:46 |
| wgrant | This is just for querying the upload queue | 23:47 |
| StevenK | Sure | 23:47 |
| wgrant | We shouldn't add features unless people need those features | 23:47 |
| StevenK | Like I said, my example is contrived | 23:47 |
| wgrant | Particularly if those features cost performance | 23:47 |
| wgrant | If you can see even the slightest reason to cut something, cut it. | 23:47 |
| StevenK | wgrant: Ah, but if we allow substrings then it makes searchable_versions and searchable_names the same in the code, which saves LoC. | 23:48 |
| wgrant | But it's also slow and relatively pointless. | 23:48 |
| StevenK | Fair enough | 23:49 |
| StevenK | I tried | 23:49 |
| StevenK | :-) | 23:49 |
| StevenK | wgrant: So I should land 40-1? | 23:49 |
| wgrant | I think so | 23:50 |
| wgrant | Well | 23:50 |
| wgrant | Where are we at with deployment? | 23:50 |
| wgrant | There's possibly a couple more private projects patches that are undeployed | 23:50 |
| StevenK | I don't think 40-0 has hit prod | 23:51 |
| StevenK | But I haven't thought about deployments for about nine days | 23:51 |
| wgrant | There appear to be four DB patches in the queue | 23:51 |
| wgrant | Argh | 23:52 |
| wgrant | One of which is bad | 23:52 |
| wgrant | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-stable/revision/12187 | 23:52 |
| wgrant | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-stable/revision/12198 is illegal as well | 23:52 |
| StevenK | wgrant: Argh | 23:54 |
| wgrant | So we'll need to talk to deryck | 23:54 |
| StevenK | Well, I think 40-0 is first in the queue anyway? | 23:54 |
| wgrant | The latter is not broken, just unwise and illegal | 23:54 |
| wgrant | The former is broken | 23:54 |
| wgrant | Ah, so it is | 23:54 |
| StevenK | So we can deploy that today and get it out of the way? | 23:56 |
| wgrant | Yeah | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!