=== cjae is now known as robotdevil [04:04] hi, do you think wrong infrared remote support is associated to lirc or to the kernel (linux)? bug #1088079 [04:04] Launchpad bug 1088079 in Ubuntu "update breaks remote control" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1088079 === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [06:08] hello, I want to nominate bug 949077 for SRU'ed in Ubuntu 12.04, Precise Pangolin [06:08] Launchpad bug 949077 in notify-osd (Ubuntu) "Black border on notifications when running with no compositing" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/949077 [06:27] Rcart, can you isolate a specific patch or code fix to fix that bug first? [06:27] Rcart, without that, it won't be SRU-able last i checked SRU policies. [06:28] oop i lied [06:28] * TheLordOfTime facedesks [06:28] links weren't displaying >.> [06:29] Rcart, you're also missing a huge portion of the SRU template [06:30] Rcart, this is the full template, of which you only have the impact section of: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template [06:30] you should include the testcase, and the regression potential [06:31] also I dont remember to see sru templates in the comments section, it's usually overwritten over the original description [06:32] yeah, if it were more complete I'd move it myself [06:32] step 3 in the procedure: [06:32] Update the bug report ***description*** and make sure it contains the following information: [06:32] and then explanation of impact, the test case, and the regression potential. [06:33] s/move/copy it to the description/ [06:34] TheLordOfTime: Thanks, I'll fix it ^^ [06:34] Rcart, don't forget to add the sections you're missing. [06:35] sure I won't (: [06:36] TheLordOfTime: Any sugesstion for 'Regression Potencial' section? [06:37] A [Regression Potential] section with a discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result of this change. It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important to make the effort to think about what could happen in the event of a regression. This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered, and provides guidance to tes [06:37] ters in regression-testing the SRU. [06:37] i'd advise you on what to put there only if i were fluent with the package [06:38] so i can't give you any suggestions there [06:38] * TheLordOfTime returns to poking at php5 [06:40] TheLordOfTime: No problem, thanks again === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [20:56] Guys i have a strange compiz overlay bug, ( im using ati HD4890 legacy drivers ) the problem is not always here. It is random but if it appears the only solution is a logout or restart.Does anyone experienced anything similar ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uai1Jh3V9-0&feature=youtu.be [20:57] Do you think i have to file a bug against compiz ? [23:04] in bug #1036252 is there a way to define it only affects kubuntu?, may be kubuntu-settings ? [23:04] Launchpad bug 1036252 in Ubuntu "Firefox profile directory not accessible from about:support in LMDE" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1036252