=== cjae is now known as robotdevil
[04:04] <chilicuil> hi, do you think wrong infrared remote support is associated to lirc or to the kernel (linux)? bug #1088079
[04:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1088079 in Ubuntu "update breaks remote control" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1088079
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[06:08] <Rcart> hello, I want to nominate bug 949077 for SRU'ed in Ubuntu 12.04, Precise Pangolin
[06:08] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 949077 in notify-osd (Ubuntu) "Black border on notifications when running with no compositing" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/949077
[06:27] <TheLordOfTime> Rcart, can you isolate a specific patch or code fix to fix that bug first?
[06:27] <TheLordOfTime> Rcart, without that, it won't be SRU-able last i checked SRU policies.
[06:28] <TheLordOfTime> oop i lied
[06:28]  * TheLordOfTime facedesks
[06:28] <TheLordOfTime> links weren't displaying >.>
[06:29] <TheLordOfTime> Rcart, you're also missing a huge portion of the SRU template
[06:30] <TheLordOfTime> Rcart, this is the full template, of which you only have the impact section of: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template
[06:30] <TheLordOfTime> you should include the testcase, and the regression potential
[06:31] <chilicuil> also I dont remember to see sru templates in the comments section, it's usually overwritten over the original description
[06:32] <TheLordOfTime> yeah, if it were more complete I'd move it myself
[06:32] <TheLordOfTime> step 3 in the procedure:
[06:32] <TheLordOfTime> Update the bug report ***description*** and make sure it contains the following information:
[06:32] <TheLordOfTime> and then explanation of impact, the test case, and the regression potential.
[06:33] <TheLordOfTime> s/move/copy it to the description/
[06:34] <Rcart> TheLordOfTime: Thanks, I'll fix it ^^
[06:34] <TheLordOfTime> Rcart, don't forget to add the sections you're missing.
[06:35] <Rcart> sure I won't (:
[06:36] <Rcart> TheLordOfTime: Any sugesstion for 'Regression Potencial' section?
[06:37] <TheLordOfTime> A [Regression Potential] section with a discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result of this change. It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important to make the effort to think about what could happen in the event of a regression. This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered, and provides guidance to tes
[06:37] <TheLordOfTime> ters in regression-testing the SRU.
[06:37] <TheLordOfTime> i'd advise you on what to put there only if i were fluent with the package
[06:38] <TheLordOfTime> so i can't give you any suggestions there
[06:38]  * TheLordOfTime returns to poking at php5
[06:40] <Rcart> TheLordOfTime: No problem, thanks again
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[20:56] <zzecool> Guys i have a strange compiz overlay  bug, ( im  using ati HD4890 legacy drivers ) the problem is not always here. It is random but if it appears the only solution is a logout or restart.Does anyone experienced anything similar ?   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uai1Jh3V9-0&feature=youtu.be
[20:57] <zzecool> Do you think i have to file a bug against compiz ?
[23:04] <chilicuil> in bug #1036252 is there a way to define it only affects kubuntu?, may be kubuntu-settings ?
[23:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1036252 in Ubuntu "Firefox profile directory not accessible from about:support in LMDE" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1036252