/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/12/12/#juju-gui.txt

=== Makyo is now known as Makyo|out
teknicouh oh, uistage is broken10:13
teknicoI just landed a branch, but it's only doc changes, it shouldn't have broken it10:14
frankbanteknico: working on it, it's not your branch 10:48
teknicofrankban, great, thanks10:48
teknicofrankban, it worked :-)11:30
frankbanteknico: yes indeed, it was just a missing reference in modules.js11:31
teknicoyep11:32
=== rogpeppe1 is now known as rogpeppe
gary_posterthank you for fixing uistage et al, frankban 13:00
frankbangary_poster: welcome13:04
frankbangary_poster: is "needs retrospective" the right tag for when you want to discuss some details of that card during our Friday's call?13:13
frankbanI mean: "class of service" -> "needs retrospective"13:13
gary_postergoodspud, hi.  I have a local lunch meeting at the time of the unit and service view meeting.  mm, benji or bac, you have experience with those pages.  Are you willing and able to attend a meeting at 1630-1700UTC and then report back to the group with minutes as I describe in "Engineer responsibilities" at the end of https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1GevzPVClAJaGX7YHG6SmdX2geGvR7uXc4xnuc7VY3t4/edit13:13
gary_poster# ?13:13
gary_posterSpecifically:13:14
gary_posterEngineer keeps minutes of the questions received, the input given, the decisions made, and the outstanding engineer-related questions and action items.13:14
gary_posterEngineer sends minutes to Juju GUI team and design team.13:14
gary_posterEngineer is responsible for getting the answers to each outstanding question from the meeting, or explicitly getting someone else to take over for that question.  If someone else takes responsibility, this hand-off is sent to the Juju GUI team and the design team.  The same goes for action items.13:14
gary_posterIf an engineer is still on the hook for an answer or action item when a new meeting is called, they should consider themselves volunteered for the next meeting.13:14
gary_posterfrankban, yes13:14
frankbangary_poster: cool thanks13:14
bacgary_poster: yes13:15
gary_posterwelcome13:15
gary_posterthanks bac, I'll add you to the invitation13:15
baci like the coercion of that last point.13:15
bacway to light a fire13:15
benjiheh13:15
goodspudI'll bring snacks along to the meeting13:16
goodspud:)13:16
gary_poster:-)13:16
gary_posterbenji, out of pur nosy curiosity, any progress on getting the production tests to pass?  I'm very curious as to what the resolution will be13:23
benjiyep, I am down from approximately eight billion failures to 213:24
gary_posterbenji, lol, excellent13:24
benjithey both appear to be of different classes of failures, so they will probably require different fixes, but I feel pretty good about it13:24
gary_postercool, benji, thanks for overview.  once you get it working I'm thing that the default test target ought to test the production story, so we all are testing the end result by default.  we'd keep the previous test target as a way to debug.  wdyt?13:26
gary_posterteknico, approved Friday, no worries13:27
benjithat's reasonable; if the tests were not so slow I would suggest running them both (or all three?), but that is not the case13:27
gary_posterright13:27
gary_posterI know!  we could parallelize them with lxc!13:27
gary_posterwait, no...13:27
frankbanlol13:29
gary_posterbcsaller, could you update kanban board to reflect your current progress please?13:38
bcsallergary_poster: done13:38
gary_posterthanks bcsaller 13:39
hazmatbcsaller, what's next after ultra-mega?13:41
bcsallerhazmat: panzoom is in progress, put it on the board13:42
bcsallerone of the smaller ones to sort out remaining issues13:42
bcsallerpart way through it after yesterday13:42
teknicogary_poster, thanks14:14
gary_posterwelcome14:14
teknicoin the code we have README and HACKING files, while in the charm we have README.txt , does anyone care about the extension?14:18
gary_posterI usually add it, but don't care a lot.  teknico, you available for a quick call on another topic (Makefile fun)?14:23
teknicogary_poster, in five minutes?14:24
gary_posterteknico, I have another meeting in 5 minutes :-) can do it in 3514:24
teknicogary_poster, ok, I'll hop on right away then14:24
gary_posterok thanks14:24
teknicobac, what happens if the kanban active lanes are full and lp2kanban needs to put a card there?14:39
bacteknico: i'd be really surprised if that is handled gracefully.14:40
teknicobac, I guess we'll find out soon enough ;-)14:40
bacteknico: yes, should be interesting.  put on your eye protection!14:40
teknicobac, and earplugs too, for good measure!14:42
=== Makyo|out is now known as Makyo
teknicouhm, nothing happened15:17
gary_posterbac bcsaller benji frankban goodspud hazmat jovan2 Makyo teknico call in 115:29
gary_posterbac goodspud starting15:31
baccoming right there15:31
=== gary_poster is now known as gary_poster|away
=== gary_poster|away is now known as gary_poster
goodspudhazmat, bac - use the team hangout for the meeting16:28
bacgoodspud: ok16:30
frankbancould anyone please review https://codereview.appspot.com/6929057 ? no rush, I am near my EOD. Anyway, charm tests work again.17:46
Makyofrankban, taking a look.17:53
frankbanthanks Makyo 17:54
hazmatgary_poster, login stuff fwiw in lp:~hazmat/juju/rapi-login19:30
* hazmat moves on to annotation support19:31
gary_posterhazmat awesome thanks.  we should switch to that from rollup?19:31
hazmatgary_poster, no.. i need to do some testing, i'll merge it into rollup after i get annotation support going19:31
gary_postercool19:31
hazmatgary_poster, there are a couple of unit tests, but i'd like to do an end to end test with the gui & charm19:31
gary_postersounds good20:17
gary_posterbac, benji, bcsaller, I'm reviewing all three cards up for review (only one left).  teknico's and Makyo's still need a second review, if you are willing and able.21:28
benjik21:28
bcsallerI can take one as well, tell me which you want benji and I'll take the other 21:29
bacgary_poster: ok.  i will in a bit.  i just put my shoes on so the dogwalk cannot wait.21:29
gary_posterbenji bcsaller bac I suggest you coordinate using the tags on the kanban cards.  put your nick on the one you plan to do or are doing21:29
benjiI don't especially want one (or any), bcsaller; have at it21:30
gary_posterthanks all21:30
gary_poster:-)21:30
gary_posterMakyo, I take it the target-specific variables didn't have the characteristics we were hoping for?  Maybe they were evaluated anyway?21:47
gary_poster(lloking at https://codereview.appspot.com/6873071/diff/1/Makefile)21:48
gary_posterlooking21:48
Makyogary_poster, Correct.  Additionally, the variable containing the target name contained the current target (which changed as make worked through the dependency tree)21:58
gary_posterMakyo, yeah I saw that second one.  Too bad target specific variables are not lazy, but I guess that makes sense21:58
gary_posterin the context of other make decisions, I mean21:59
Makyogary_poster, yeah.  Additionally the env var solution fits with the other release patterns, i.e.: PROD=1 make tarball22:00
gary_posteryeah, I thought of that.  I'm mostly just going to be asking for comments explaining why we have to do this stuff.22:00
Makyogary_poster, okay.22:01
Makyogary_poster, additionally, found out that bzr ls without the -V option lists all files in the directory (but still contacts the parent branch to do so), so the later instances of that translated neatly to find commands.22:01
gary_posterMakyo, cool, though we need to exclude editor effluvia from them at the least22:02
Makyogary_poster, okay.  Wasn't before, but that's a good addition.22:02
gary_posterMakyo, it did, because we were using bzr ls22:02
gary_posterand we don't commit editor effluvia22:03
Makyogary_poster, bzr ls without the -V option would include those files.  -V wasn't used in those latter two instances.22:03
gary_posterah!22:03
gary_postersuck22:03
MakyoBut that is a good addition for omitting.22:03
gary_posterwell, then yes, please make it better :-)22:03
Makyo\o/22:03
gary_poster:-)22:03
gary_posterbenji, for the charm, I'd like to be able to make a release file without uploading it.  you removed the phony target to do so.  Am I correct in assuming that you don't object to adding it back as long as we have a use case?22:09
benjigary_poster: ah, I hadn't reallized that was a use case; sure add it back22:12
gary_postercool thanks22:13
benjiI would love for us to have tests of the Makefile; I claim that we need a card to that end22:13
gary_posterbenji, make a slack card to show us how we coudl do it please22:15
gary_posterwe could do that in the charm too fwiw22:16
gary_posterthough granted it would be nicer and more appropriate in the code itself22:16
gary_posterMakyo, reviewed: "Land with changes" :-)22:20
gary_posterrunning to get son from acting class...22:20
Makyogary_poster, thanks :)22:20
bacgary_poster: i'm back but looks like all the reviews are taken22:25
MakyoGoing to lay down for a bit.22:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!