=== buildslayer is now known as shadeslayer | ||
bjsnider | ricotz, 313.09 blob released | 17:04 |
---|---|---|
bjsnider | i wonder if they still plan on making the 310 stable | 17:07 |
ricotz | bjsnider, already uploaded ;) and 310.19 is stable | 17:12 |
bjsnider | nobody's emailed me axing for it | 17:15 |
=== broder_ is now known as broder | ||
mlankhorst | 310 works for me, but then again my system is unstable for other reasons :-) | 18:33 |
bjsnider | ricotz, 310 would exclude old junk hardware right? so do you suppose it should go in x-updates anyway? | 18:35 |
ricotz | bjsnider, imo 310 (nvidia-graphics-drivers) should get the main version and 304 getting a legacy package (nvidia-graphics-drivers-304) with some proper replaces and provides | 18:37 |
ricotz | i must admit i don't care for this in edgers :\ | 18:38 |
bjsnider | the ppa can be removed if the user has old junk | 18:39 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
bjsnider | ricotz, isn't it in edgers anyway? | 19:09 |
ricotz | bjsnider, what is it edgers anyway? | 19:11 |
ricotz | (currently there is only 313.09) | 19:11 |
bjsnider | the 310/313 blob | 19:11 |
ricotz | only 313 | 19:12 |
bjsnider | it's there even though you don't want it there | 19:12 |
ricotz | what? | 19:12 |
ricotz | the 310 binaries will be purged automatically within a day or so | 19:13 |
ricotz | and arent available anymore through apt from the ppa | 19:13 |
bjsnider | i don't know what you meant by saying you "don't care for this in edgers" | 19:14 |
ricotz | "i dont care about supporting legacy cards" while there is only the latest avaible driver | 19:17 |
bjsnider | oh, i see | 19:18 |
bjsnider | not a big deal in edgers | 19:18 |
bjsnider | because of what edgers is | 19:18 |
MCR1 | ricotz: Hi :) FYI: Latest fglrx update from the xorg-edgers PPA also successful and working. | 19:29 |
MCR1 | ricotz: Thx && keep them coming ;) | 19:30 |
ricotz | MCR1, good, this one is suppose to be the stable one, so no watermark, i guess | 19:50 |
MCR1 | ricotz, I had a watermark - it was saying unsupported hardware, which was a bit strange... | 19:51 |
MCR1 | but seems working | 19:51 |
ricotz | MCR1, hmm, i see, this is suppose to be 12.12 | 19:56 |
MCR1 | ricotz: It says Catalyst Version 12.9 in AMD CCC Information | 19:58 |
MCR1 | ricotz: haha, but it does not even detect the memory of my card correctly, so not sure how correct this info is | 20:00 |
ricotz | hmm, http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/embedded/Pages/embedded_linux.aspx | 20:01 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
ricotz | i guess this was the wrong one | 20:03 |
Sarvatt | MCR1: control+alt+f1, sudo service lightdm stop, sudo rm /etc/ati/amdpcsdb, sudo service lightdm start | 20:12 |
Sarvatt | and it'll update | 20:12 |
ricotz | Sarvatt, oh | 20:13 |
ricotz | but you were too late ;) | 20:13 |
Sarvatt | mlankhorst: argh ya need to version ppa stuff with ~ or something in a ppa, caused https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1068165 with x-updates :) | 21:58 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1068165 in libdrm (Ubuntu) "package libdrm2 2.4.39-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libdrm2/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libdrm2:amd64" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 21:58 |
Sarvatt | so the next releases version is higher | 21:59 |
mlankhorst | yeah I usually tend to at least | 21:59 |
Sarvatt | tseliot: i threw a newer fglrx-installer-experimental-9 in x-updates if you want to reuse any of it for the distro | 22:00 |
mlankhorst | Sarvatt: that was with qbp enabled probably then? | 22:01 |
Sarvatt | nah thats renamed, looks pretty clear they had x-updates and tried to go 12.04 to 12.10 | 22:01 |
Sarvatt | just noticed that there was a same version one in x-updates when i went to upload this fglrx | 22:02 |
mlankhorst | oh I didn't upload to x-updates though? | 22:02 |
Sarvatt | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates | 22:02 |
Sarvatt | hmm | 22:02 |
Sarvatt | did you upload it to the distro? maybe someone pocket copied | 22:02 |
mlankhorst | might have been from qbp though | 22:03 |
Sarvatt | Copied from ubuntu precise in Xorg server 1.13 by Bryce Harrington oops :) | 22:04 |
mlankhorst | at one point I did upload one with the version bumped, just so it wouldn't conflict any more like that | 22:04 |
Sarvatt | libdrm needs an SRU :P | 22:04 |
* mlankhorst wants libdrm 2.4.41 :( | 22:05 | |
mlankhorst | with the kepler abi change | 22:05 |
Sarvatt | are you kidding....? | 22:05 |
mlankhorst | nah, small one though, backwards compatible :P | 22:05 |
mlankhorst | I'm guessing darktama is holding it off until the kernel parts land first | 22:05 |
Sarvatt | oh man, was about to throw something if we needed libdrm-nouveau2a for raring | 22:06 |
mlankhorst | hahahah | 22:06 |
RAOF | libdrm-nouveau3.1415! | 22:06 |
mlankhorst | (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ | 22:06 |
mlankhorst | Sarvatt: it's just increasing the size of a struct so I can stuff in the engine id, and drive the decoder engines on kepler | 22:07 |
Sarvatt | at least plymouth wont need it so its pretty painless now.. | 22:08 |
Sarvatt | what, plymouth got updated and doesn't build device specific drm backends but still depends on device specific libdrms | 22:10 |
RAOF | ??? | 22:12 |
mlankhorst | also I'm stupid and I got 1080p working now | 22:13 |
mlankhorst | \o/ | 22:13 |
Sarvatt | just build depends, binaries are fine, phew | 22:13 |
Sarvatt | wonder if fglrx-installer-experimental-9 even works in 12.10, think it needed jocky or software-properties changes and its never been uploaded to quantal | 22:14 |
mlankhorst | I guess I may push the vdpau crap to mesa now | 22:20 |
RAOF | Sarvatt: I was under the impression that the necessary changes were already in Quantal's bits. | 22:26 |
Sarvatt | oh hell, FTL broken with edgers today | 22:33 |
RAOF | Troubling! | 22:36 |
mlankhorst | Sarvatt: reading it a second time I guess you meant the game, first time I thought flash transition layer | 23:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!