=== buildslayer is now known as shadeslayer
[17:04] <bjsnider> ricotz, 313.09 blob released
[17:07] <bjsnider> i wonder if they still plan on making the 310 stable
[17:12] <ricotz> bjsnider, already uploaded ;) and 310.19 is stable
[17:15] <bjsnider> nobody's emailed me axing for it
=== broder_ is now known as broder
[18:33] <mlankhorst> 310 works for me, but then again my system is unstable for other reasons :-)
[18:35] <bjsnider> ricotz, 310 would exclude old junk hardware right? so do you suppose it should go in x-updates anyway?
[18:37] <ricotz> bjsnider, imo 310 (nvidia-graphics-drivers) should get the main version and 304 getting a legacy package (nvidia-graphics-drivers-304) with some proper replaces and provides
[18:38] <ricotz> i must admit i don't care for this in edgers :\
[18:39] <bjsnider> the ppa can be removed if the user has old junk
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[19:09] <bjsnider> ricotz, isn't it in edgers anyway?
[19:11] <ricotz> bjsnider, what is it edgers anyway?
[19:11] <ricotz> (currently there is only 313.09)
[19:11] <bjsnider> the 310/313 blob
[19:12] <ricotz> only 313
[19:12] <bjsnider> it's there even though you don't want it there
[19:12] <ricotz> what?
[19:13] <ricotz> the 310 binaries will be purged automatically within a day or so
[19:13] <ricotz> and arent available anymore through apt from the ppa
[19:14] <bjsnider> i don't know what you meant by saying you "don't care for this in edgers"
[19:17] <ricotz> "i dont care about supporting legacy cards" while there is only the latest avaible driver
[19:18] <bjsnider> oh, i see
[19:18] <bjsnider> not a big deal in edgers
[19:18] <bjsnider> because of what edgers is
[19:29] <MCR1> ricotz: Hi :) FYI: Latest fglrx update from the xorg-edgers PPA also successful and working.
[19:30] <MCR1> ricotz: Thx && keep them coming ;)
[19:50] <ricotz> MCR1, good, this one is suppose to be the stable one, so no watermark, i guess
[19:51] <MCR1> ricotz, I had a watermark - it was saying unsupported hardware, which was a bit strange...
[19:51] <MCR1> but seems working
[19:56] <ricotz> MCR1, hmm, i see, this is suppose to be 12.12
[19:58] <MCR1> ricotz: It says Catalyst Version 12.9 in AMD CCC Information
[20:00] <MCR1> ricotz: haha, but it does not even detect the memory of my card correctly, so not sure how correct this info is
[20:01] <ricotz> hmm, http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/embedded/Pages/embedded_linux.aspx
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
[20:03] <ricotz> i guess this was the wrong one
[20:12] <Sarvatt> MCR1: control+alt+f1, sudo service lightdm stop, sudo rm /etc/ati/amdpcsdb, sudo service lightdm start
[20:12] <Sarvatt> and it'll update
[20:13] <ricotz> Sarvatt, oh
[20:13] <ricotz> but you were too late ;)
[21:58] <Sarvatt> mlankhorst: argh ya need to version ppa stuff with ~ or something in a ppa, caused https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1068165 with x-updates :)
[21:58] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 1068165 in libdrm (Ubuntu) "package libdrm2 2.4.39-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libdrm2/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libdrm2:amd64" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[21:59] <Sarvatt> so the next releases version is higher
[21:59] <mlankhorst> yeah I usually tend to at least
[22:00] <Sarvatt> tseliot: i threw a newer fglrx-installer-experimental-9 in x-updates if you want to reuse any of it for the distro
[22:01] <mlankhorst> Sarvatt: that was with qbp enabled probably then?
[22:01] <Sarvatt> nah thats renamed, looks pretty clear they had x-updates and tried to go 12.04 to 12.10
[22:02] <Sarvatt> just noticed that there was a same version one in x-updates when i went to upload this fglrx
[22:02] <mlankhorst> oh I didn't upload to x-updates though?
[22:02] <Sarvatt> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates
[22:02] <Sarvatt> hmm
[22:02] <Sarvatt> did you upload it to the distro? maybe someone pocket copied
[22:03] <mlankhorst> might have been from qbp though
[22:04] <Sarvatt> Copied from ubuntu precise in Xorg server 1.13 by Bryce Harrington oops :)
[22:04] <mlankhorst> at one point I did upload one with the version bumped, just so it wouldn't conflict any more like that
[22:04] <Sarvatt> libdrm needs an SRU :P
[22:05]  * mlankhorst wants libdrm 2.4.41 :(
[22:05] <mlankhorst> with the kepler abi change
[22:05] <Sarvatt> are you kidding....?
[22:05] <mlankhorst> nah, small one though, backwards compatible :P
[22:05] <mlankhorst> I'm guessing darktama is holding it off until the kernel parts land first
[22:06] <Sarvatt> oh man, was about to throw something if we needed libdrm-nouveau2a for raring
[22:06] <mlankhorst> hahahah
[22:06] <RAOF> libdrm-nouveau3.1415!
[22:06] <mlankhorst> (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
[22:07] <mlankhorst> Sarvatt: it's just increasing the size of a struct so I can stuff in the engine id, and drive the decoder engines on kepler
[22:08] <Sarvatt> at least plymouth wont need it so its pretty painless now..
[22:10] <Sarvatt> what, plymouth got updated and doesn't build device specific drm backends but still depends on device specific libdrms
[22:12] <RAOF> ???
[22:13] <mlankhorst> also I'm stupid and I got 1080p working now
[22:13] <mlankhorst> \o/
[22:13] <Sarvatt> just build depends, binaries are fine, phew
[22:14] <Sarvatt> wonder if fglrx-installer-experimental-9 even works in 12.10, think it needed jocky or software-properties changes and its never been uploaded to quantal
[22:20] <mlankhorst> I guess I may push the vdpau crap to mesa now
[22:26] <RAOF> Sarvatt: I was under the impression that the necessary changes were already in Quantal's bits.
[22:33] <Sarvatt> oh hell, FTL broken with edgers today
[22:36] <RAOF> Troubling!
[23:04] <mlankhorst> Sarvatt: reading it a second time I guess you meant the game, first time I thought flash transition layer