ubottu | escott called the ops in #ubuntu (dingoateyourbaby) | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
ubottu | dingoateyourbaby called the ops in #ubuntu (escott) | 00:00 |
ubottu | dingoateyourbaby called the ops in #ubuntu (please answer my question) | 00:02 |
Jordan_U | Flannel: I don't know if you've had a chance to read the whole scollback, but it's more than enough already to warrant a ban. (which I'll soon give if they continue). | 00:05 |
Flannel | I didn't, no. Go right ahead if he continues! | 00:05 |
Flannel | I saw him acting like a jackass, but didn't go back further since there was plenty of more recent context right there. | 00:06 |
k1l | "dingoateyourbaby> Greetings and Salutations, bitches." that was a false start from the beginning | 00:07 |
Jordan_U | And to their main point, unless I'm mistaken Lubuntu still ships by default with a non-pae kernel, and people with hardware that needs such a kernel are probably not going to be happy with a regular Ubuntu installation anyway. | 00:08 |
Flannel | lubuntu maintains their own kernel? | 00:09 |
Flannel | I guess it's no different than ubuntu studio, but still. | 00:09 |
Jordan_U | Flannel: No, they just ship the non-pae kernel on their install media by default (again IIRC). | 00:10 |
Flannel | so... you can install non-pae, but once it's installed, you can't upgrade it to non-pae? | 00:11 |
Flannel | (that doesn't make any sense to me) | 00:11 |
k1l | linux kernels are dropping 386 from 3.8 on, just read anywhere these days | 00:11 |
Flannel | oh, huh. Apparently they do. | 00:11 |
Jordan_U | Hmm, maybe even Lubuntu now ships with a kernel requiring PAE in 12.10. | 00:13 |
Jordan_U | k1l: Dropping support for 386s is far different from dropping support for non-pae CPUs. | 00:14 |
Flannel | Yeah, 12.10 seems to indicate that, 12.04 is the only one that has a special one | 00:14 |
Myrtti | dropping 386 :-( | 00:14 |
bazhang | @mark #ubuntu [binary_glitch] (~binary-gl@24-116-68-250.cpe.cableone.net): binary-glitch64 long incessant trolling rant | 05:57 |
ubottu | The operation succeeded. | 05:57 |
IdleOne | !guidelines > srhb | 06:32 |
ubottu | cfhowlett called the ops in #ubuntu (klasa) | 08:05 |
Pici | boozewooz again .__. | 13:17 |
DJones | Pici: Is woozbooze in #u the same as boozewooz that you've just removed | 13:25 |
Pici | DJones: very likely | 13:25 |
ubottu | In #ubuntu, sgtkilljoy said: ubottu: ntfs-3g is included no? | 18:22 |
Pici | ikonia: looks like Magiobiwan was klined actually | 21:23 |
ikonia | oh really | 21:23 |
ikonia | he wasn't doing anything bad in #ubuntu | 21:23 |
ikonia | just looked like a bad connection | 21:23 |
Pici | 16:20:43 >>>> Magiobiwan (IRC@unaffiliated/magiobiwan) has quit [K-Lined] | 21:23 |
Pici | (from #freenode) | 21:23 |
ikonia | remove the ban then | 21:24 |
Pici | Just wanted to keep you in the loop. | 21:24 |
ikonia | appreciated | 21:24 |
ikonia | no point having a ban there | 21:24 |
Fuchs | these k-lines (for join/excess flood parts) are usually rather short | 21:30 |
Fuchs | just as a sidenote | 21:30 |
Fuchs | it might be handy to still have a forward in place, there were cases where the k-line fixed it, and cases where they just came back, bouncing some more | 21:30 |
ikonia | leftist -> myhero again | 22:18 |
k1l | didnt ban leftist because he was silent after my kick | 22:42 |
ikonia | muted him | 22:55 |
ikonia | nothing more | 22:55 |
k1l | ahh, i read +b in my hurry, sry | 22:56 |
ikonia | not a problem | 22:56 |
ikonia | not much difference in a lot of ways | 22:56 |
k1l | well, you can join with a +q, but cant with a +b | 22:57 |
ikonia | yes | 22:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!