[00:05] <Jordan_U> Flannel: I don't know if you've had a chance to read the whole scollback, but it's more than enough already to warrant a ban. (which I'll soon give if they continue).
[00:05] <Flannel> I didn't, no.  Go right ahead if he continues!
[00:06] <Flannel> I saw him acting like a jackass, but didn't go back further since there was plenty of more recent context right there.
[00:07] <k1l> "dingoateyourbaby> Greetings and Salutations, bitches." that was a false start from the beginning
[00:08] <Jordan_U> And to their main point, unless I'm mistaken Lubuntu still ships by default with a non-pae kernel, and people with hardware that needs such a kernel are probably not going to be happy with a regular Ubuntu installation anyway.
[00:09] <Flannel> lubuntu maintains their own kernel?
[00:09] <Flannel> I guess it's no different than ubuntu studio, but still.
[00:10] <Jordan_U> Flannel: No, they just ship the non-pae kernel on their install media by default (again IIRC).
[00:11] <Flannel> so... you can install non-pae, but once it's installed, you can't upgrade it to non-pae?
[00:11] <Flannel> (that doesn't make any sense to me)
[00:11] <k1l> linux kernels are dropping 386 from 3.8 on, just read anywhere these days
[00:11] <Flannel> oh, huh.  Apparently they do.
[00:13] <Jordan_U> Hmm, maybe even Lubuntu now ships with a kernel requiring PAE in 12.10.
[00:14] <Jordan_U> k1l: Dropping support for 386s is far different from dropping support for non-pae CPUs.
[00:14] <Flannel> Yeah, 12.10 seems to indicate that, 12.04 is the only one that has a special one
[00:14] <Myrtti> dropping 386 :-(
[05:57] <bazhang> @mark #ubuntu [binary_glitch] (~binary-gl@24-116-68-250.cpe.cableone.net): binary-glitch64   long incessant trolling rant
[06:32] <IdleOne> !guidelines > srhb
[13:17] <Pici> boozewooz again .__.
[13:25] <DJones> Pici: Is woozbooze in #u the same as boozewooz that you've just removed
[13:25] <Pici> DJones: very likely
[21:23] <Pici> ikonia: looks like Magiobiwan was klined actually
[21:23] <ikonia> oh really
[21:23] <ikonia> he wasn't doing anything bad in #ubuntu
[21:23] <ikonia> just looked like a bad connection
[21:23] <Pici> 16:20:43 >>>> Magiobiwan (IRC@unaffiliated/magiobiwan) has quit [K-Lined]
[21:23] <Pici> (from #freenode)
[21:24] <ikonia> remove the ban then
[21:24] <Pici> Just wanted to keep you in the loop.
[21:24] <ikonia> appreciated
[21:24] <ikonia> no point having a ban there
[21:30] <Fuchs> these k-lines (for join/excess flood parts) are usually rather short
[21:30] <Fuchs> just as a sidenote
[21:30] <Fuchs> it might be handy to still have a forward in place, there were cases where the k-line fixed it, and cases where they just came back, bouncing some more
[22:18] <ikonia> leftist -> myhero again
[22:42] <k1l> didnt ban leftist because he was silent after my kick
[22:55] <ikonia> muted him
[22:55] <ikonia> nothing more
[22:56] <k1l> ahh, i read +b in my hurry, sry
[22:56] <ikonia> not a problem
[22:56] <ikonia> not much difference in a lot of ways
[22:57] <k1l> well, you can join with a +q, but cant with a +b
[22:59] <ikonia> yes