[00:00] escott called the ops in #ubuntu (dingoateyourbaby) [00:00] dingoateyourbaby called the ops in #ubuntu (escott) [00:02] dingoateyourbaby called the ops in #ubuntu (please answer my question) [00:05] Flannel: I don't know if you've had a chance to read the whole scollback, but it's more than enough already to warrant a ban. (which I'll soon give if they continue). [00:05] I didn't, no. Go right ahead if he continues! [00:06] I saw him acting like a jackass, but didn't go back further since there was plenty of more recent context right there. [00:07] "dingoateyourbaby> Greetings and Salutations, bitches." that was a false start from the beginning [00:08] And to their main point, unless I'm mistaken Lubuntu still ships by default with a non-pae kernel, and people with hardware that needs such a kernel are probably not going to be happy with a regular Ubuntu installation anyway. [00:09] lubuntu maintains their own kernel? [00:09] I guess it's no different than ubuntu studio, but still. [00:10] Flannel: No, they just ship the non-pae kernel on their install media by default (again IIRC). [00:11] so... you can install non-pae, but once it's installed, you can't upgrade it to non-pae? [00:11] (that doesn't make any sense to me) [00:11] linux kernels are dropping 386 from 3.8 on, just read anywhere these days [00:11] oh, huh. Apparently they do. [00:13] Hmm, maybe even Lubuntu now ships with a kernel requiring PAE in 12.10. [00:14] k1l: Dropping support for 386s is far different from dropping support for non-pae CPUs. [00:14] Yeah, 12.10 seems to indicate that, 12.04 is the only one that has a special one [00:14] dropping 386 :-( [05:57] @mark #ubuntu [binary_glitch] (~binary-gl@24-116-68-250.cpe.cableone.net): binary-glitch64 long incessant trolling rant [05:57] The operation succeeded. [06:32] !guidelines > srhb [08:05] cfhowlett called the ops in #ubuntu (klasa) [13:17] boozewooz again .__. [13:25] Pici: Is woozbooze in #u the same as boozewooz that you've just removed [13:25] DJones: very likely [18:22] In #ubuntu, sgtkilljoy said: ubottu: ntfs-3g is included no? [21:23] ikonia: looks like Magiobiwan was klined actually [21:23] oh really [21:23] he wasn't doing anything bad in #ubuntu [21:23] just looked like a bad connection [21:23] 16:20:43 >>>> Magiobiwan (IRC@unaffiliated/magiobiwan) has quit [K-Lined] [21:23] (from #freenode) [21:24] remove the ban then [21:24] Just wanted to keep you in the loop. [21:24] appreciated [21:24] no point having a ban there [21:30] these k-lines (for join/excess flood parts) are usually rather short [21:30] just as a sidenote [21:30] it might be handy to still have a forward in place, there were cases where the k-line fixed it, and cases where they just came back, bouncing some more [22:18] leftist -> myhero again [22:42] didnt ban leftist because he was silent after my kick [22:55] muted him [22:55] nothing more [22:56] ahh, i read +b in my hurry, sry [22:56] not a problem [22:56] not much difference in a lot of ways [22:57] well, you can join with a +q, but cant with a +b [22:59] yes