[01:02] hi xnox [01:03] phillw: hello. [01:05] xnox: is there a set of instructions so that I could pull in the proposed fix for suggested at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/1086974/comments/2 [01:05] Launchpad bug 1086974 in libguestfs (Ubuntu Quantal) "libguestfs: error: cannot find any suitable libguestfs supermin" [High,Confirmed] [01:07] phillw: well, I've tried to do it & it turns out that picking that change is non-trivial: because both ubuntu UDD imports are out of date & debian vcs history is out of date. [01:07] otherwise it would have been a one line $ bzr merge -rX..Y lp:ubuntu/libgestfs into the quantal branch =/ [01:08] * xnox has filed bugs in ubuntu UDD & debian upstream about missing revision histories. [01:09] phillw: sorry for the delay. I will manually reconstruct changes from debdiffs and upload something. [01:09] xnox: hmm okies... as there is a larger (more critical) problem, I'm really at a loss here. bug 1088692 I haven't asked ikonia if he's had chance to follow up on it. [01:09] Launchpad bug 1088692 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Screen corrupt when installing 13.04 using KVM" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1088692 [01:09] but it's 1AM now here and I am falling asleep..... [01:10] xnox: you share the same time as me :) I was just checking mails before heading for bed :) Have a good sleep :) [01:11] phillw: well. that one is a duplicate. currently we have two types of screen corruptions one affected desktop background only & another affecting any video. [01:11] and your screenshot shows a mixture of the two =/ [01:12] phillw: i'll escalate it. [01:12] tomorrow =) [01:12] good night! [01:13] balloons: FYI ^^ [01:17] got it [01:20] balloons: good :) as Jackson asked a little while back, is there any further work to do on http://pad.ubuntu.com/communitywebsite-contribute-quality before it can become a draft wiki page so we can begin the process of splitting it into its areas? [01:27] phillw, should be ready to go at this point [01:27] the further work is to update the page we linked to of common questions [01:28] I need to ping everyone about the ide [01:29] do you want me to transfer it to WIP wiki page, so people can work on the grammar / tidy up? [01:32] For the FAQ, we can set up one as best as we know, but that area will be better populated from the feedback we get on the classroom sessions :) [01:33] it's the tutorial page [01:33] it's linked from there [01:34] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Tutorials [01:34] you can see the basic idea [01:34] i've got to run atm, but feel free to leave thoughts and I'll ping back tomorrow [01:35] I'm going to try have an early night tonite. I'll be about from about 15:00 UTC 19th Dec (Christmas shopping to do). === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [07:35] Good morning [07:41] Good morning pitti [08:06] good morning [08:25] evening guys === charlie is now known as Guest37178 === yofel_ is now known as yofel [09:13] I want to get the knowledge on QA automation approach which handles on Ubuntu12.04 [09:14] Appreciate if anybody respond about this. [09:17] appreciate if you give some explanation about is there any automation tool handled for QA part on Ubuntu12.04 [09:43] suga: I cannot understand your question. Have you google for project called "jenkins" ? [09:52] Atually I want to know the QA automation approach handled on Ubuntu12.04 release [09:53] For example; LDTP framework is used by ubuntu11.04 QA team.. Like that, what is the QA automation approach on Ubuntu12.04 [09:55] we use jenkins, auto-pkg-tests, UTAH, xpressor, auto-pilot. [09:55] see: http://qa.ubuntu.com/automation/ [09:56] but we should update that page as we no longer use mago: but instead auto-pilot & https://launchpad.net/xpresser [09:56] jibel: ^^^^ [09:59] xnox, right, I don't have privileges to edit this page though :) [09:59] gema, do you? ^ [10:00] jibel: not last time I tried, but I filed a ticket, it may be fixed now [10:00] * gema trying [10:01] jibel: I seem to be able to, I am not sure how to change it though [10:01] suga: can you explain to me all you find confusing about the page? [10:02] jibel: or shall I just remove the mago part? [10:02] jibel: at least until we get to it [10:05] gema: please remove the mago bit, and someone should write a paragraph about xpresser. [10:06] xnox: I am on the writing something about xpresser bit [10:08] I do not have permission to preview drafts [10:08] I wonder if it'll allow me to write x) [10:08] xnox: feedback please, before I leave typos on the page: http://qa.ubuntu.com/automation/ [10:09] gema: looks good. [10:09] suga: see updated http://qa.ubuntu.com/automation/ [10:14] xnox: I even added the way to contribute testing to utah x) [10:16] suga: thanks for pointing us out that there was old information there [10:17] pointing out to us, even === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:18] pitti: jibel: gema: me & jodh tried to reproduce the usec assertition failure as seen in jenkins, but locally. We didn't managed to (even with using auto-package-test branch/scripts) [12:19] is there a chance to get ssh into the --login kvm instance of that failure? [12:21] syslog / dmesg from the failure whould be nice as well. [14:22] xnox: yes, I'm sure that we can arrange something [14:23] pitti: cool. i think jibel promised to setup stuff for me in a private message ;-) [14:23] xnox: might it be related that you and I usually try on a raring host, but the VMs in the DC run on a precise host kernel? or kvm itself being older there? [14:24] xnox, yeah I promised, and will do ... soonish [14:24] jibel: if you are busy, I can take this [14:25] I was thinking on logging into the temporary VM and setting up an ssh tunnel to some place xnox can reach [14:26] pitti: me can reach qalab vpn... [14:28] xnox: ah, good, that'll make it simple [14:34] jibel: I'm on it [14:38] jibel: ok, xnox has something to play with :) [14:39] pitti, ahah, many thanks! [14:40] xnox, you owe pitti a green dot ;) [14:40] oui, j'aime le vert! [14:41] la rouge est très mauvaise [14:43] xnox: upstart fails locally for me as well, but much later (in user_sessions, there is stderr output "No LSB modules are available.") [14:44] pitti: that is known. And by the way "No LSB modules are available" is printer, because of a hook call if any tests failed. [14:44] pitti: on a passing user_sessions there is no stderr. [14:44] ah, ok [14:44] but that is also fixed in trunk =) [14:45] (just to please adt ;-) ) === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [15:17] pitti: i think qa lab machines are simply too damn fast [15:17] haha [15:17] xnox: yeah, they have umpteen cores and GB of RAM and [15:18] s/and$// [15:18] "a supercomputer is a machine which can perform an endless loop in just two seconds" [15:19] pitti: so the machine has nanosecond resolution, yet utmp records only store microsecond resolution and hence upstart test-suite fails -> expecting a different time between two writes, while it can actually be within same microsecond. [15:19] * xnox rolls eyes [15:22] but let's do this, ask her to do the change in salesforce (she'll do it in 2 minutes, I will take all morning figuring salesforce out) [15:23] then, if c3 doesn't change, I can frob the database easily (takes 2 minutes) [15:23] total time = 4 minutes [15:23] hahaha [15:38] roadmr: wrong channel? [15:38] xnox: sorry :/ === balloons changed the topic of #ubuntu-quality to: "Welcome to Ubuntu Quality | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam" [17:10] roadmr: heh [19:35] can someone contact the testdrive devs and get netboot added to it somehow, or autoconfig for ppc. both would help hugely [19:40] bug 1084729 [19:40] bug 1084729 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "manual partitioning fails to create a partition table" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1084729 [19:44] bug 1087823, bug 1085173 [19:44] bug 1087823 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Raring) "in the manual partitioning page the "new partition table" gets more buttons every time you click it" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1087823 [19:44] bug 1085173 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "partitioning window opens on the top left corner of the screen and cannot be moved away" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1085173 [19:44] can someone confirm bug 1087848, vbox is need i believe [19:44] bug 1087848 in lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) "no login background lubuntu daily 13.04 amd64" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1087848 [19:45] Noskcaj: I have vbox on my local machine, is only vbox that it is seen on? [19:46] phillw, that i have seen it on, i haven't check for it for about a week however [19:48] Noskcaj: I'm zsyncing up the lubuntu amd13.04 daily. I'll check it on KVM and VBox a bit later (My fave T.V. programme is about to start :) ) [19:49] ok, thanks. and what show would that be? [19:50] Stargate SG1 :) [19:50] phillw, ok, never seen it. i will be online all of today as school finished for the year yesterday [19:51] okay. I'll be back in ~ 1hour 15 mins. [19:52] I'll have a play with manual partitioning of lubuntu 13.04 and check if the display is there. [19:53] for netboots, that would have to be done on my dedi server owing to the amount of data needed to download. [19:57] phillw, understandable. netboot in general is broken. turns out i won't be online all day, i have to babysit my 3 year old brother [19:58] he he... just when you thought you had a free day :) [19:59] :( === salem_ is now known as _salem